Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement

In this results-oriented era of accountability, educator preparation programs are called upon to provide comprehensive data related to student and program outcomes while also providing evidence of continuous improvement. Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning (CASL) is one approach for fostering...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Colby, Monica Lambert, Jennifer McGee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-12-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016673131
id doaj-26a1dc98ec6f4bcbb2b440c3ede01097
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26a1dc98ec6f4bcbb2b440c3ede010972020-11-25T02:54:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-12-01610.1177/215824401667313110.1177_2158244016673131Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous ImprovementSusan Colby0Monica Lambert1Jennifer McGee2Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USAAppalachian State University, Boone, NC, USAAppalachian State University, Boone, NC, USAIn this results-oriented era of accountability, educator preparation programs are called upon to provide comprehensive data related to student and program outcomes while also providing evidence of continuous improvement. Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning (CASL) is one approach for fostering critical inquiry about student learning. Graduate educator preparation programs in our university used collaborative analysis as the basis for continuous improvement during an accreditation cycle. As authors of this study, we sought to better understand how graduate program directors and faculty used collaborative analysis to inform practice and improve programs. Our findings suggested that CASL has the potential to foster collective responsibility for student learning, but only with a strong commitment from administrators and faculty, purposefully designed protocols and processes, fidelity to the CASL method, and a focus on professional development. Through CASL, programs have the ability to produce meaningful data related to student and program outcomes and meet the requirements for accreditation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016673131
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Colby
Monica Lambert
Jennifer McGee
spellingShingle Susan Colby
Monica Lambert
Jennifer McGee
Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
SAGE Open
author_facet Susan Colby
Monica Lambert
Jennifer McGee
author_sort Susan Colby
title Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
title_short Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
title_full Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
title_fullStr Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning in Educator Preparation Programs for Continuous Improvement
title_sort utilizing collaborative analysis of student learning in educator preparation programs for continuous improvement
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In this results-oriented era of accountability, educator preparation programs are called upon to provide comprehensive data related to student and program outcomes while also providing evidence of continuous improvement. Collaborative Analysis of Student Learning (CASL) is one approach for fostering critical inquiry about student learning. Graduate educator preparation programs in our university used collaborative analysis as the basis for continuous improvement during an accreditation cycle. As authors of this study, we sought to better understand how graduate program directors and faculty used collaborative analysis to inform practice and improve programs. Our findings suggested that CASL has the potential to foster collective responsibility for student learning, but only with a strong commitment from administrators and faculty, purposefully designed protocols and processes, fidelity to the CASL method, and a focus on professional development. Through CASL, programs have the ability to produce meaningful data related to student and program outcomes and meet the requirements for accreditation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016673131
work_keys_str_mv AT susancolby utilizingcollaborativeanalysisofstudentlearningineducatorpreparationprogramsforcontinuousimprovement
AT monicalambert utilizingcollaborativeanalysisofstudentlearningineducatorpreparationprogramsforcontinuousimprovement
AT jennifermcgee utilizingcollaborativeanalysisofstudentlearningineducatorpreparationprogramsforcontinuousimprovement
_version_ 1724720848751820800