Comparative Study of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) between Different Types of Orthodontic Treatment

• Main Authors: Natalia Zamora-Martínez, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, Verónica García-Sanz, José Luis Gandía-Franco, Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
• Series: Medicina
• Subjects: oral health-related quality of life; orthodontic treatment needs; malocclusion; patient assessment
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/7/683

<i>Background and objectives:</i> Although the main objective of any orthodontic treatment is to correct malocclusion, a range of psychosocial and/or esthetic factors drive patients to undergo orthodontic treatment. The aim of the present study was to analyze variations in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) levels in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment by means of four types of appliances: fixed buccal metal brackets, fixed buccal esthetic/ceramic brackets, fixed lingual brackets, and clear aligners. <i>Material and Methods</i>: The study sample comprised 120 patients aged 18 to 68 years who attended the Orthodontic department at the Dental Clinic of the University of Valencia. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was used to measure orthodontic treatment need. Each patient completed three different intervals of the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): before treatment (T0); six months after placing the orthodontic appliances (T1) and at the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). <i>Results</i>: All groups suffered a reduction in quality of life from T0 to T1 except the metal bracket group which presented the same level for the functional limitation domain (<i>p</i> = 1.000), the lingual bracket group for the psychological discomfort domain (<i>p</i> = 1.000) and clear aligner group for the physical disability domain (<i>p</i> = 0.118) and psychological disability domain (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Nevertheless, quality of life for most domains was similar in all groups at the end of treatment (T2). <i>Conclusions</i>: Patients underwent a significant reduction in quality of life during treatment in comparison with their pre-treatment condition but showed significant improvements at the end of treatment.