The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure

This article focuses on the negotiations that the European Commission, with the formal support of France, Italy and Spain, opened with Senegal in 2008 for a mobility partnership agreement. Mobility partnerships, as defined by the Commission in 2007, are a new EU (multilateral) instrument for managin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meng-Hsuan Chou, Marie V Gibert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2012-12-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
EU
Online Access:https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/434
id doaj-2686bf616cdd42ffa07c149fbcc3f993
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2686bf616cdd42ffa07c149fbcc3f9932020-11-25T04:08:32ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2012-12-0184The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failureMeng-Hsuan Chou0Marie V Gibert1SCANCOR, Stanford UniversityInternational Relations, Division of Politics and International Relations, Nottingham Trent UniversityThis article focuses on the negotiations that the European Commission, with the formal support of France, Italy and Spain, opened with Senegal in 2008 for a mobility partnership agreement. Mobility partnerships, as defined by the Commission in 2007, are a new EU (multilateral) instrument for managing migratory flows into the Union. The negotiations with Senegal were indefinitely suspended in 2009 and are now widely considered as having failed. This article sets out to identify the factors that contributed to the suspension of talks. It shows that failure can be attributed to a complex web of factors originating in the specific Senegalese, European and Senegal-EU political landscapes and jointly contributing to an unfavourable cost-benefit calculation by the French and Senegalese parties to the negotiation, to an unclear and awkward negotiating strategy on the part of the European Commission and to incoherent, EU and Senegalese, foreign policies. This, in turn, points to the complex task of concluding multilateral agreements on issues as politically sensitive, for both parties, as migration.https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/434Circular migrationEUexternal dimensionmobility partnershipSenegal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meng-Hsuan Chou
Marie V Gibert
spellingShingle Meng-Hsuan Chou
Marie V Gibert
The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
Journal of Contemporary European Research
Circular migration
EU
external dimension
mobility partnership
Senegal
author_facet Meng-Hsuan Chou
Marie V Gibert
author_sort Meng-Hsuan Chou
title The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
title_short The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
title_full The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
title_fullStr The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
title_full_unstemmed The EU-Senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
title_sort eu-senegal mobility partnership: from launch to suspension and negotiation failure
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2012-12-01
description This article focuses on the negotiations that the European Commission, with the formal support of France, Italy and Spain, opened with Senegal in 2008 for a mobility partnership agreement. Mobility partnerships, as defined by the Commission in 2007, are a new EU (multilateral) instrument for managing migratory flows into the Union. The negotiations with Senegal were indefinitely suspended in 2009 and are now widely considered as having failed. This article sets out to identify the factors that contributed to the suspension of talks. It shows that failure can be attributed to a complex web of factors originating in the specific Senegalese, European and Senegal-EU political landscapes and jointly contributing to an unfavourable cost-benefit calculation by the French and Senegalese parties to the negotiation, to an unclear and awkward negotiating strategy on the part of the European Commission and to incoherent, EU and Senegalese, foreign policies. This, in turn, points to the complex task of concluding multilateral agreements on issues as politically sensitive, for both parties, as migration.
topic Circular migration
EU
external dimension
mobility partnership
Senegal
url https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/434
work_keys_str_mv AT menghsuanchou theeusenegalmobilitypartnershipfromlaunchtosuspensionandnegotiationfailure
AT marievgibert theeusenegalmobilitypartnershipfromlaunchtosuspensionandnegotiationfailure
AT menghsuanchou eusenegalmobilitypartnershipfromlaunchtosuspensionandnegotiationfailure
AT marievgibert eusenegalmobilitypartnershipfromlaunchtosuspensionandnegotiationfailure
_version_ 1724425283418718208