Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation need...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318 |
id |
doaj-2682d7ed0925443588cc7cdb3c411add |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2682d7ed0925443588cc7cdb3c411add2020-11-25T01:37:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-11-0110131810.1186/1472-6963-10-318Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot studyvan Nispen Ruth MABruijning Janna Evan Rens Ger HMB<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation needs of visually impaired persons. This pilot study tests the feasibility of the D-AI using a computer-assisted telephone interview.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In addition to the regular intake, the first version of the D-AI was assessed in 20 patients. Subsequently, patients and intake assessors were asked to fill in an evaluation form. Based on these evaluations, a new version of the D-AI was developed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean administration time of the D-AI was 88.8 (± 41.0) minutes. Overall, patients and assessors were positive about the D-AI assessment. However, professionals and 60% of the patients found the administration time to be too long. All included items were considered relevant and only minor adjustments were recommended.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The systematic character of the revised D-AI will prevent topics from being overlooked and indicate which needs have the highest priority from a patient-centred perspective. Moreover, ongoing assessment of the D-AI will enhance evaluation of the rehabilitation process. To decrease administration time, in the revised D-AI only the top priority goals will be fully assessed. Using the D-AI, a rehabilitation plan based on individual needs can be developed for each patient. Moreover, it enables better evaluation of the effects of rehabilitation. A larger validation study is planned.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
van Nispen Ruth MA Bruijning Janna E van Rens Ger HMB |
spellingShingle |
van Nispen Ruth MA Bruijning Janna E van Rens Ger HMB Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study BMC Health Services Research |
author_facet |
van Nispen Ruth MA Bruijning Janna E van Rens Ger HMB |
author_sort |
van Nispen Ruth MA |
title |
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study |
title_short |
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study |
title_full |
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study |
title_fullStr |
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study |
title_sort |
feasibility of the dutch icf activity inventory: a pilot study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2010-11-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation needs of visually impaired persons. This pilot study tests the feasibility of the D-AI using a computer-assisted telephone interview.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In addition to the regular intake, the first version of the D-AI was assessed in 20 patients. Subsequently, patients and intake assessors were asked to fill in an evaluation form. Based on these evaluations, a new version of the D-AI was developed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean administration time of the D-AI was 88.8 (± 41.0) minutes. Overall, patients and assessors were positive about the D-AI assessment. However, professionals and 60% of the patients found the administration time to be too long. All included items were considered relevant and only minor adjustments were recommended.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The systematic character of the revised D-AI will prevent topics from being overlooked and indicate which needs have the highest priority from a patient-centred perspective. Moreover, ongoing assessment of the D-AI will enhance evaluation of the rehabilitation process. To decrease administration time, in the revised D-AI only the top priority goals will be fully assessed. Using the D-AI, a rehabilitation plan based on individual needs can be developed for each patient. Moreover, it enables better evaluation of the effects of rehabilitation. A larger validation study is planned.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vannispenruthma feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy AT bruijningjannae feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy AT vanrensgerhmb feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy |
_version_ |
1725058585643188224 |