Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation need...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Nispen Ruth MA, Bruijning Janna E, van Rens Ger HMB
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318
id doaj-2682d7ed0925443588cc7cdb3c411add
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2682d7ed0925443588cc7cdb3c411add2020-11-25T01:37:17ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-11-0110131810.1186/1472-6963-10-318Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot studyvan Nispen Ruth MABruijning Janna Evan Rens Ger HMB<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation needs of visually impaired persons. This pilot study tests the feasibility of the D-AI using a computer-assisted telephone interview.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In addition to the regular intake, the first version of the D-AI was assessed in 20 patients. Subsequently, patients and intake assessors were asked to fill in an evaluation form. Based on these evaluations, a new version of the D-AI was developed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean administration time of the D-AI was 88.8 (± 41.0) minutes. Overall, patients and assessors were positive about the D-AI assessment. However, professionals and 60% of the patients found the administration time to be too long. All included items were considered relevant and only minor adjustments were recommended.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The systematic character of the revised D-AI will prevent topics from being overlooked and indicate which needs have the highest priority from a patient-centred perspective. Moreover, ongoing assessment of the D-AI will enhance evaluation of the rehabilitation process. To decrease administration time, in the revised D-AI only the top priority goals will be fully assessed. Using the D-AI, a rehabilitation plan based on individual needs can be developed for each patient. Moreover, it enables better evaluation of the effects of rehabilitation. A larger validation study is planned.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van Nispen Ruth MA
Bruijning Janna E
van Rens Ger HMB
spellingShingle van Nispen Ruth MA
Bruijning Janna E
van Rens Ger HMB
Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet van Nispen Ruth MA
Bruijning Janna E
van Rens Ger HMB
author_sort van Nispen Ruth MA
title Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
title_short Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
title_full Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
title_fullStr Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: a pilot study
title_sort feasibility of the dutch icf activity inventory: a pilot study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2010-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Demographic ageing will lead to increasing pressure on visual rehabilitation services, which need to be efficiently organised in the near future. The Dutch ICF Activity Inventory (D-AI) was developed to assess the rehabilitation needs of visually impaired persons. This pilot study tests the feasibility of the D-AI using a computer-assisted telephone interview.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In addition to the regular intake, the first version of the D-AI was assessed in 20 patients. Subsequently, patients and intake assessors were asked to fill in an evaluation form. Based on these evaluations, a new version of the D-AI was developed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean administration time of the D-AI was 88.8 (± 41.0) minutes. Overall, patients and assessors were positive about the D-AI assessment. However, professionals and 60% of the patients found the administration time to be too long. All included items were considered relevant and only minor adjustments were recommended.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The systematic character of the revised D-AI will prevent topics from being overlooked and indicate which needs have the highest priority from a patient-centred perspective. Moreover, ongoing assessment of the D-AI will enhance evaluation of the rehabilitation process. To decrease administration time, in the revised D-AI only the top priority goals will be fully assessed. Using the D-AI, a rehabilitation plan based on individual needs can be developed for each patient. Moreover, it enables better evaluation of the effects of rehabilitation. A larger validation study is planned.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/318
work_keys_str_mv AT vannispenruthma feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy
AT bruijningjannae feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy
AT vanrensgerhmb feasibilityofthedutchicfactivityinventoryapilotstudy
_version_ 1725058585643188224