Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers

Abstract Background Fluid resuscitation during cardiac surgery is common with significant variability in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate current practice patterns of fluid volume expansion in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries in the USA. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional onli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Solomon Aronson, Paul Nisbet, Martin Bunke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Perioperative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-017-0071-6
id doaj-267a0d3709fa41459be35679f150a434
record_format Article
spelling doaj-267a0d3709fa41459be35679f150a4342020-11-24T21:18:01ZengBMCPerioperative Medicine2047-05252017-10-016111110.1186/s13741-017-0071-6Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providersSolomon Aronson0Paul Nisbet1Martin Bunke2Department of Anesthesiology, Duke UniversityOne Research, LLCDepartment of Medical Affairs, GrifolsAbstract Background Fluid resuscitation during cardiac surgery is common with significant variability in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate current practice patterns of fluid volume expansion in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries in the USA. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 124 cardiothoracic surgeons, cardiovascular anesthesiologists, and perfusionists. Survey questions were designed to assess clinical decision-making patterns of intravenous (IV) fluid utilization in cardiovascular surgery for five types of patients who need volume expansion: (1) patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without bleeding, (2) patients undergoing CPB with bleeding, (3) patients undergoing acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), (4) patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or use of a ventricular assist device (VAD), and (5) patients undergoing either off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). First-choice fluid used in fluid boluses for these five patient types was requested. Descriptive statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and follow-up tests, including t tests, to evaluate differences among respondent groups. Results The most commonly preferred indicators of volume status were blood pressure, urine output, cardiac output, central venous pressure, and heart rate. The first choice of fluid for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding was crystalloids, whereas 5% albumin was the most preferred first choice of fluid for bleeding patients. For volume expansion during ECMO or VAD, the respondents were equally likely to prefer 5% albumin or crystalloids as a first choice of IV fluid, with 5% albumin being the most frequently used adjunct fluid to crystalloids. Surgeons, as a group, more often chose starches as an adjunct fluid to crystalloids for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding. Surgeons were also more likely to use 25% albumin as an adjunct fluid than were anesthesiologists. While most perfusionists reported using crystalloids to prime the CPB circuit, one third preferred a mixture of 25% albumin and crystalloids. Less interstitial edema and more sustained volume expansion were considered the most important colloid traits in volume expansion. Conclusions Fluid utilization practice patterns in the USA varied depending on patient characteristics and clinical specialties of health care professionals.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-017-0071-6Fluid resuscitationColloidsCrystalloidsAlbuminCardiovascular surgeryIntraoperative volume expansion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Solomon Aronson
Paul Nisbet
Martin Bunke
spellingShingle Solomon Aronson
Paul Nisbet
Martin Bunke
Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
Perioperative Medicine
Fluid resuscitation
Colloids
Crystalloids
Albumin
Cardiovascular surgery
Intraoperative volume expansion
author_facet Solomon Aronson
Paul Nisbet
Martin Bunke
author_sort Solomon Aronson
title Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
title_short Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
title_full Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
title_fullStr Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
title_full_unstemmed Fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the USA: a survey of health care providers
title_sort fluid resuscitation practices in cardiac surgery patients in the usa: a survey of health care providers
publisher BMC
series Perioperative Medicine
issn 2047-0525
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background Fluid resuscitation during cardiac surgery is common with significant variability in clinical practice. Our goal was to investigate current practice patterns of fluid volume expansion in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries in the USA. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 124 cardiothoracic surgeons, cardiovascular anesthesiologists, and perfusionists. Survey questions were designed to assess clinical decision-making patterns of intravenous (IV) fluid utilization in cardiovascular surgery for five types of patients who need volume expansion: (1) patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without bleeding, (2) patients undergoing CPB with bleeding, (3) patients undergoing acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), (4) patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or use of a ventricular assist device (VAD), and (5) patients undergoing either off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). First-choice fluid used in fluid boluses for these five patient types was requested. Descriptive statistics were performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and follow-up tests, including t tests, to evaluate differences among respondent groups. Results The most commonly preferred indicators of volume status were blood pressure, urine output, cardiac output, central venous pressure, and heart rate. The first choice of fluid for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding was crystalloids, whereas 5% albumin was the most preferred first choice of fluid for bleeding patients. For volume expansion during ECMO or VAD, the respondents were equally likely to prefer 5% albumin or crystalloids as a first choice of IV fluid, with 5% albumin being the most frequently used adjunct fluid to crystalloids. Surgeons, as a group, more often chose starches as an adjunct fluid to crystalloids for patients needing volume expansion during CPB without bleeding. Surgeons were also more likely to use 25% albumin as an adjunct fluid than were anesthesiologists. While most perfusionists reported using crystalloids to prime the CPB circuit, one third preferred a mixture of 25% albumin and crystalloids. Less interstitial edema and more sustained volume expansion were considered the most important colloid traits in volume expansion. Conclusions Fluid utilization practice patterns in the USA varied depending on patient characteristics and clinical specialties of health care professionals.
topic Fluid resuscitation
Colloids
Crystalloids
Albumin
Cardiovascular surgery
Intraoperative volume expansion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-017-0071-6
work_keys_str_mv AT solomonaronson fluidresuscitationpracticesincardiacsurgerypatientsintheusaasurveyofhealthcareproviders
AT paulnisbet fluidresuscitationpracticesincardiacsurgerypatientsintheusaasurveyofhealthcareproviders
AT martinbunke fluidresuscitationpracticesincardiacsurgerypatientsintheusaasurveyofhealthcareproviders
_version_ 1726010707571376128