Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

We study the impact of coil orientation on the motor threshold (MT) and present an optimal coil orientation for stimulation of the foot. The result can be compared to results of models that predict this orientation from electrodynamic properties of the media in the skull and from orientations of cel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lars Richter, Gunnar Neumann, Stephen Oung, Achim Schweikard, Peter Trillenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3623976?pdf=render
id doaj-26523d5d1472433a97214c4507e5a7bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26523d5d1472433a97214c4507e5a7bc2020-11-24T21:53:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0184e6035810.1371/journal.pone.0060358Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.Lars RichterGunnar NeumannStephen OungAchim SchweikardPeter TrillenbergWe study the impact of coil orientation on the motor threshold (MT) and present an optimal coil orientation for stimulation of the foot. The result can be compared to results of models that predict this orientation from electrodynamic properties of the media in the skull and from orientations of cells, respectively. We used a robotized TMS system for precise coil placement and recorded motor-evoked potentials with surface electrodes on the abductor hallucis muscle of the right foot in 8 healthy control subjects. First, we performed a hot-spot search in standard (lateral) orientation and then rotated the coil in steps of 10° or 20°. At each step we estimated the MT. For navigated stimulation and for correlation with the underlying anatomy a structural MRI scan was obtained. Optimal coil orientation was 33.1 ± 18.3° anteriorly in relation to the standard lateral orientation. In this orientation the threshold was 54 ± 18% in units of maximum stimulator output. There was a significant difference of 8.0 ± 5.9% between the MTs at optimal and at standard orientation. The optimal coil orientations were significantly correlated with the direction perpendicular to the postcentral gyrus ([Formula: see text]). Robotized TMS facilitates sufficiently precise coil positioning and orientation to study even small variations of the MT with coil orientation. The deviations from standard orientation are more closely matched by models based on field propagation in media than by models based on orientations of pyramidal cells.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3623976?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lars Richter
Gunnar Neumann
Stephen Oung
Achim Schweikard
Peter Trillenberg
spellingShingle Lars Richter
Gunnar Neumann
Stephen Oung
Achim Schweikard
Peter Trillenberg
Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lars Richter
Gunnar Neumann
Stephen Oung
Achim Schweikard
Peter Trillenberg
author_sort Lars Richter
title Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_short Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_full Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_fullStr Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_full_unstemmed Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
title_sort optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description We study the impact of coil orientation on the motor threshold (MT) and present an optimal coil orientation for stimulation of the foot. The result can be compared to results of models that predict this orientation from electrodynamic properties of the media in the skull and from orientations of cells, respectively. We used a robotized TMS system for precise coil placement and recorded motor-evoked potentials with surface electrodes on the abductor hallucis muscle of the right foot in 8 healthy control subjects. First, we performed a hot-spot search in standard (lateral) orientation and then rotated the coil in steps of 10° or 20°. At each step we estimated the MT. For navigated stimulation and for correlation with the underlying anatomy a structural MRI scan was obtained. Optimal coil orientation was 33.1 ± 18.3° anteriorly in relation to the standard lateral orientation. In this orientation the threshold was 54 ± 18% in units of maximum stimulator output. There was a significant difference of 8.0 ± 5.9% between the MTs at optimal and at standard orientation. The optimal coil orientations were significantly correlated with the direction perpendicular to the postcentral gyrus ([Formula: see text]). Robotized TMS facilitates sufficiently precise coil positioning and orientation to study even small variations of the MT with coil orientation. The deviations from standard orientation are more closely matched by models based on field propagation in media than by models based on orientations of pyramidal cells.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3623976?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT larsrichter optimalcoilorientationfortranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT gunnarneumann optimalcoilorientationfortranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT stephenoung optimalcoilorientationfortranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT achimschweikard optimalcoilorientationfortranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT petertrillenberg optimalcoilorientationfortranscranialmagneticstimulation
_version_ 1725870852606525440