Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches

Abstract To simulate the growth of geological veins, it is necessary to model the crystal shape anisotropy. Two different models, classical and natural models, which incorporate the surface energy anisotropy into the objective functional of Ginzburg–Landau type, are presented here. Phase-field evolu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oleg Tschukin, Alexander Silberzahn, Michael Selzer, Prince G. K. Amos, Daniel Schneider, Britta Nestler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-10-01
Series:Geothermal Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0077-9
id doaj-261675d1ff8f44ad9aef0c15c57e0283
record_format Article
spelling doaj-261675d1ff8f44ad9aef0c15c57e02832020-11-25T01:50:22ZengSpringerOpenGeothermal Energy2195-97062017-10-015112110.1186/s40517-017-0077-9Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approachesOleg Tschukin0Alexander Silberzahn1Michael Selzer2Prince G. K. Amos3Daniel Schneider4Britta Nestler5Institute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyInstitute for Applied Materials (IAM-CMS), Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyAbstract To simulate the growth of geological veins, it is necessary to model the crystal shape anisotropy. Two different models, classical and natural models, which incorporate the surface energy anisotropy into the objective functional of Ginzburg–Landau type, are presented here. Phase-field evolution equations, considered in this work, are derived using the variational approach, and correspond to the conservative Allen–Cahn-type equation. For three characteristic anisotropy formulations, we show what kind of difficulties arise in the simulations for the presented models. Particularly, if the anisotropy becomes strong, the phase-field evolution equations become ill-posed. Thus, we present regularized phase-field models and discuss the corresponding simulation results. Furthermore, in the scope of the grain growth simulation, we extend the original two-phase models to multiphases.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0077-9Phase fieldAnisotropyAllen–Cahn equation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleg Tschukin
Alexander Silberzahn
Michael Selzer
Prince G. K. Amos
Daniel Schneider
Britta Nestler
spellingShingle Oleg Tschukin
Alexander Silberzahn
Michael Selzer
Prince G. K. Amos
Daniel Schneider
Britta Nestler
Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
Geothermal Energy
Phase field
Anisotropy
Allen–Cahn equation
author_facet Oleg Tschukin
Alexander Silberzahn
Michael Selzer
Prince G. K. Amos
Daniel Schneider
Britta Nestler
author_sort Oleg Tschukin
title Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
title_short Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
title_full Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
title_fullStr Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
title_full_unstemmed Concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
title_sort concepts of modeling surface energy anisotropy in phase-field approaches
publisher SpringerOpen
series Geothermal Energy
issn 2195-9706
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract To simulate the growth of geological veins, it is necessary to model the crystal shape anisotropy. Two different models, classical and natural models, which incorporate the surface energy anisotropy into the objective functional of Ginzburg–Landau type, are presented here. Phase-field evolution equations, considered in this work, are derived using the variational approach, and correspond to the conservative Allen–Cahn-type equation. For three characteristic anisotropy formulations, we show what kind of difficulties arise in the simulations for the presented models. Particularly, if the anisotropy becomes strong, the phase-field evolution equations become ill-posed. Thus, we present regularized phase-field models and discuss the corresponding simulation results. Furthermore, in the scope of the grain growth simulation, we extend the original two-phase models to multiphases.
topic Phase field
Anisotropy
Allen–Cahn equation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40517-017-0077-9
work_keys_str_mv AT olegtschukin conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
AT alexandersilberzahn conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
AT michaelselzer conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
AT princegkamos conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
AT danielschneider conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
AT brittanestler conceptsofmodelingsurfaceenergyanisotropyinphasefieldapproaches
_version_ 1725002377740681216