McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
Alternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-11-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092 |
id |
doaj-26055f237caa4166a68d684d9ecb96a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-26055f237caa4166a68d684d9ecb96a62020-11-24T22:44:54ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502014-11-016118092811210.3390/su6118092su6118092McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social ChangeMaki Hatanaka0Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Campus Box 2446, Huntsville, TX 77341, USAAlternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this paper raises concerns regarding the impacts of certification on alternative food and agriculture movements, and their aims of furthering sustainability and justice. Drawing on George Ritzer’s McDonaldization framework, I argue that the ecological shrimp project became McDonaldized with the introduction of voluntary standards and certification. Specifically, efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control became key characteristics of the shrimp project. While the introduction of such characteristics increased market access, it also entailed significant costs, including an erosion of trust and marginalization and alienation of farmers. Given such tradeoffs, in concluding I propose that certification is producing particular forms of environmental sustainability and social justice, what I term McSustainability and McJustice. While enabling the expansion of alternative food and agriculture, McSustainability and McJustice tend to allow little opportunity for farmer empowerment and food sovereignty, as well as exclude aspects of sustainable farming or ethical production that are not easily measured, standardized, and validated.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092standardscertificationalternative food and agriculturemarket-based approachesshrimp aquaculturesocial movements |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maki Hatanaka |
spellingShingle |
Maki Hatanaka McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change Sustainability standards certification alternative food and agriculture market-based approaches shrimp aquaculture social movements |
author_facet |
Maki Hatanaka |
author_sort |
Maki Hatanaka |
title |
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change |
title_short |
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change |
title_full |
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change |
title_fullStr |
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change |
title_full_unstemmed |
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change |
title_sort |
mcsustainability and mcjustice: certification, alternative food and agriculture, and social change |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
Alternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this paper raises concerns regarding the impacts of certification on alternative food and agriculture movements, and their aims of furthering sustainability and justice. Drawing on George Ritzer’s McDonaldization framework, I argue that the ecological shrimp project became McDonaldized with the introduction of voluntary standards and certification. Specifically, efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control became key characteristics of the shrimp project. While the introduction of such characteristics increased market access, it also entailed significant costs, including an erosion of trust and marginalization and alienation of farmers. Given such tradeoffs, in concluding I propose that certification is producing particular forms of environmental sustainability and social justice, what I term McSustainability and McJustice. While enabling the expansion of alternative food and agriculture, McSustainability and McJustice tend to allow little opportunity for farmer empowerment and food sovereignty, as well as exclude aspects of sustainable farming or ethical production that are not easily measured, standardized, and validated. |
topic |
standards certification alternative food and agriculture market-based approaches shrimp aquaculture social movements |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT makihatanaka mcsustainabilityandmcjusticecertificationalternativefoodandagricultureandsocialchange |
_version_ |
1725689997775863808 |