McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change

Alternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maki Hatanaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092
id doaj-26055f237caa4166a68d684d9ecb96a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-26055f237caa4166a68d684d9ecb96a62020-11-24T22:44:54ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502014-11-016118092811210.3390/su6118092su6118092McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social ChangeMaki Hatanaka0Department of Sociology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Campus Box 2446, Huntsville, TX 77341, USAAlternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this paper raises concerns regarding the impacts of certification on alternative food and agriculture movements, and their aims of furthering sustainability and justice. Drawing on George Ritzer’s McDonaldization framework, I argue that the ecological shrimp project became McDonaldized with the introduction of voluntary standards and certification. Specifically, efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control became key characteristics of the shrimp project. While the introduction of such characteristics increased market access, it also entailed significant costs, including an erosion of trust and marginalization and alienation of farmers. Given such tradeoffs, in concluding I propose that certification is producing particular forms of environmental sustainability and social justice, what I term McSustainability and McJustice. While enabling the expansion of alternative food and agriculture, McSustainability and McJustice tend to allow little opportunity for farmer empowerment and food sovereignty, as well as exclude aspects of sustainable farming or ethical production that are not easily measured, standardized, and validated.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092standardscertificationalternative food and agriculturemarket-based approachesshrimp aquaculturesocial movements
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maki Hatanaka
spellingShingle Maki Hatanaka
McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
Sustainability
standards
certification
alternative food and agriculture
market-based approaches
shrimp aquaculture
social movements
author_facet Maki Hatanaka
author_sort Maki Hatanaka
title McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
title_short McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
title_full McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
title_fullStr McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
title_full_unstemmed McSustainability and McJustice: Certification, Alternative Food and Agriculture, and Social Change
title_sort mcsustainability and mcjustice: certification, alternative food and agriculture, and social change
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Alternative food and agriculture movements increasingly rely on market-based approaches, particularly voluntary standards and certification, to advance environmental sustainability and social justice. Using a case study of an ecological shrimp project in Indonesia that became certified organic, this paper raises concerns regarding the impacts of certification on alternative food and agriculture movements, and their aims of furthering sustainability and justice. Drawing on George Ritzer’s McDonaldization framework, I argue that the ecological shrimp project became McDonaldized with the introduction of voluntary standards and certification. Specifically, efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control became key characteristics of the shrimp project. While the introduction of such characteristics increased market access, it also entailed significant costs, including an erosion of trust and marginalization and alienation of farmers. Given such tradeoffs, in concluding I propose that certification is producing particular forms of environmental sustainability and social justice, what I term McSustainability and McJustice. While enabling the expansion of alternative food and agriculture, McSustainability and McJustice tend to allow little opportunity for farmer empowerment and food sovereignty, as well as exclude aspects of sustainable farming or ethical production that are not easily measured, standardized, and validated.
topic standards
certification
alternative food and agriculture
market-based approaches
shrimp aquaculture
social movements
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/11/8092
work_keys_str_mv AT makihatanaka mcsustainabilityandmcjusticecertificationalternativefoodandagricultureandsocialchange
_version_ 1725689997775863808