Different forms of glycine- and GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptor mediated inhibitory synaptic transmission in mouse superficial and deep dorsal horn neurons

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Neurons in superficial (SDH) and deep (DDH) laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn receive sensory information from skin, muscle, joints and viscera. In both regions, glycine- (GlyR) and GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptors (GABA&l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brichta Alan M, Tooney Paul A, Beveridge Natalie J, Graham Brett A, Anderson Wayne B, Callister Robert J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2009-11-01
Series:Molecular Pain
Online Access:http://www.molecularpain.com/content/5/1/65
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Neurons in superficial (SDH) and deep (DDH) laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn receive sensory information from skin, muscle, joints and viscera. In both regions, glycine- (GlyR) and GABA<sub>A</sub>-receptors (GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs) contribute to fast synaptic inhibition. For rat, several types of GABA<sub>A</sub>R coexist in the two regions and each receptor type provides different contributions to inhibitory tone. Recent work in mouse has discovered an additional type of GlyR, (containing alpha 3 subunits) in the SDH. The contribution of differing forms of the GlyR to sensory processing in SDH and DDH is not understood.</p> <p>Methods and Results</p> <p>Here we compare fast inhibitory synaptic transmission in mouse (P17-37) SDH and DDH using patch-clamp electrophysiology in transverse spinal cord slices (L3-L5 segments, 23°C). GlyR-mediated mIPSCs were detected in 74% (25/34) and 94% (25/27) of SDH and DDH neurons, respectively. In contrast, GABA<sub>A</sub>R-mediated mIPSCs were detected in virtually all neurons in both regions (93%, 14/15 and 100%, 18/18). Several Gly- and GABA<sub>A</sub>R properties also differed in SDH vs. DDH. GlyR-mediated mIPSC amplitude was smaller (37.1 ± 3.9 vs. 64.7 ± 5.0 pA; n = 25 each), decay time was slower (8.5 ± 0.8 vs. 5.5 ± 0.3 ms), and frequency was lower (0.15 ± 0.03 vs. 0.72 ± 0.13 Hz) in SDH vs. DDH neurons. In contrast, GABA<sub>A</sub>R-mediated mIPSCs had similar amplitudes (25.6 ± 2.4, n = 14 vs. 25. ± 2.0 pA, n = 18) and frequencies (0.21 ± 0.08 vs. 0.18 ± 0.04 Hz) in both regions; however, decay times were slower (23.0 ± 3.2 vs. 18.9 ± 1.8 ms) in SDH neurons. Mean single channel conductance underlying mIPSCs was identical for GlyRs (54.3 ± 1.6 pS, n = 11 vs. 55.7 ± 1.8, n = 8) and GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs (22.7 ± 1.7 pS, n = 10 vs. 22.4 ± 2.0 pS, n = 11) in both regions. We also tested whether the synthetic endocanabinoid, methandamide (methAEA), had direct effects on Gly- and GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs in each spinal cord region. MethAEA (5 μM) reduced GlyR-mediated mIPSC frequency in SDH and DDH, but did not affect other properties. Similar results were observed for GABA<sub>A</sub>R mediated mIPSCs, however, rise time was slowed by methAEA in SDH neurons.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Together these data show that Gly- and GABA<sub>A</sub>Rs with clearly differing physiological properties and cannabinoid-sensitivity contribute to fast synaptic inhibition in mouse SDH and DDH.</p>
ISSN:1744-8069