A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003

We assess threats to environmental sustainability by examining the trends in three measures of the ecological footprint (EF) the total EF, the per capita EF, and the EF intensity of the economy (EF/GDP) for China, India, Japan, and the United States. from 1961 to 2003. The EF, an estimate of the l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard York, Eugene A. Rosa, Thomas Dietz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of World-Systems Research
Online Access:http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/319
id doaj-25e49f5399e8491382849a47a585b119
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25e49f5399e8491382849a47a585b1192020-11-24T21:39:47ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2015-08-0115213414610.5195/jwsr.2009.319313A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003Richard York0Eugene A. Rosa1Thomas Dietz2University of OregonWashington State UniversityMichigan State UniversityWe assess threats to environmental sustainability by examining the trends in three measures of the ecological footprint (EF) the total EF, the per capita EF, and the EF intensity of the economy (EF/GDP) for China, India, Japan, and the United States. from 1961 to 2003. The EF, an estimate of the land area needed to sustain use of the environment, is the most comprehensive measure of anthropogenic pressure on the environment available and is growing in use. We argue that the total EF is the most relevant indicator for assessing threats to natures capital and services, that per capita EF is the most relevant indicator of global inequalities, and that EF intensity is the most relevant indicator of economic benefits from environmental exploitation. We find in all four nations that the ecological intensity of the economy declined (i.e., efficiency improved) over this period, but the total national EF increased substantially. This is a demonstration of the Jevons paradox, where efficiency does not appear to reduce resource consumption, but rather escalates consumption thereby increasing threats to environmental sustainability.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/319
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard York
Eugene A. Rosa
Thomas Dietz
spellingShingle Richard York
Eugene A. Rosa
Thomas Dietz
A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
Journal of World-Systems Research
author_facet Richard York
Eugene A. Rosa
Thomas Dietz
author_sort Richard York
title A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
title_short A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
title_full A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
title_fullStr A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
title_full_unstemmed A Tale of Contrasting Trends: Three Measures of the Ecological Footprint in China, India, Japan, and the United States, 1961-2003
title_sort tale of contrasting trends: three measures of the ecological footprint in china, india, japan, and the united states, 1961-2003
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of World-Systems Research
issn 1076-156X
publishDate 2015-08-01
description We assess threats to environmental sustainability by examining the trends in three measures of the ecological footprint (EF) the total EF, the per capita EF, and the EF intensity of the economy (EF/GDP) for China, India, Japan, and the United States. from 1961 to 2003. The EF, an estimate of the land area needed to sustain use of the environment, is the most comprehensive measure of anthropogenic pressure on the environment available and is growing in use. We argue that the total EF is the most relevant indicator for assessing threats to natures capital and services, that per capita EF is the most relevant indicator of global inequalities, and that EF intensity is the most relevant indicator of economic benefits from environmental exploitation. We find in all four nations that the ecological intensity of the economy declined (i.e., efficiency improved) over this period, but the total national EF increased substantially. This is a demonstration of the Jevons paradox, where efficiency does not appear to reduce resource consumption, but rather escalates consumption thereby increasing threats to environmental sustainability.
url http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/319
work_keys_str_mv AT richardyork ataleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
AT eugenearosa ataleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
AT thomasdietz ataleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
AT richardyork taleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
AT eugenearosa taleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
AT thomasdietz taleofcontrastingtrendsthreemeasuresoftheecologicalfootprintinchinaindiajapanandtheunitedstates19612003
_version_ 1725929302129639424