JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

The courts in the United States are called upon annually to determine partisan political disputes. The recent lawsuits on the 2020 presidential election in the US have gained significant attention. It is acknowledged that court decisions must be made to uphold the rule of law, regardless of the poli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenneth L. Fields
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: European University Scientific Research Institute of Law 2021-01-01
Series:სამართალი და მსოფლიო
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lawandworld.ge/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%E1%83%9C%E1%83%90%E1%83%A8%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9B%E1%83%94%E1%83%91%E1%83%98-N16-1-7.pdf
id doaj-25d8a049868649d0bd460f72679acbe9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25d8a049868649d0bd460f72679acbe92021-08-02T22:59:44ZdeuEuropean University Scientific Research Institute of Lawსამართალი და მსოფლიო2346-79162587-50432021-01-0171616doi.org/10.36475/7.1.1JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATESKenneth L. Fields0Judge of the Superior Court of Arizona, Arbitrator & Mediator, University of Kentucky, Doctor of Jurisprudence, University of KentuckyThe courts in the United States are called upon annually to determine partisan political disputes. The recent lawsuits on the 2020 presidential election in the US have gained significant attention. It is acknowledged that court decisions must be made to uphold the rule of law, regardless of the political affiliation of judges. Without any doubt, considering the sensitivity of the cases due to the political background, a relevant approach is needed for judicial decisions to be made. Therefore, the process of decision making must encompass relevant observations and be based on the experiences of the judge, as well as, strong intuitive senses of case evaluation may be of crucial importance. This may lead to the need for specific recommendations to maintain a relevant approach and standard.https://lawandworld.ge/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%E1%83%9C%E1%83%90%E1%83%A8%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9B%E1%83%94%E1%83%91%E1%83%98-N16-1-7.pdfjudgeconstitutionelection
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth L. Fields
spellingShingle Kenneth L. Fields
JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
სამართალი და მსოფლიო
judge
constitution
election
author_facet Kenneth L. Fields
author_sort Kenneth L. Fields
title JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
title_short JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
title_full JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
title_fullStr JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING IN ELECTION DISPUTES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES
title_sort judicial decision-making in election disputes within the united states
publisher European University Scientific Research Institute of Law
series სამართალი და მსოფლიო
issn 2346-7916
2587-5043
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The courts in the United States are called upon annually to determine partisan political disputes. The recent lawsuits on the 2020 presidential election in the US have gained significant attention. It is acknowledged that court decisions must be made to uphold the rule of law, regardless of the political affiliation of judges. Without any doubt, considering the sensitivity of the cases due to the political background, a relevant approach is needed for judicial decisions to be made. Therefore, the process of decision making must encompass relevant observations and be based on the experiences of the judge, as well as, strong intuitive senses of case evaluation may be of crucial importance. This may lead to the need for specific recommendations to maintain a relevant approach and standard.
topic judge
constitution
election
url https://lawandworld.ge/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%E1%83%9C%E1%83%90%E1%83%A8%E1%83%A0%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9B%E1%83%94%E1%83%91%E1%83%98-N16-1-7.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethlfields judicialdecisionmakinginelectiondisputeswithintheunitedstates
_version_ 1721225837545521152