Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adjunctive use of laser devices as high reactive-level laser/light therapy (HLLT) or photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for periodontal therapy is known to be more effective on suppressing pain than conventional therapy, however, there are no systematic reviews addressed its effectiveness. This syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Risako Mikami, Koji Mizutani, Yoshiyuki Sasaki, Takanori Iwata, Akira Aoki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238659
id doaj-25cdca0077c44f20b2f0230e64d9bfc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25cdca0077c44f20b2f0230e64d9bfc32021-03-03T22:04:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023865910.1371/journal.pone.0238659Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Risako MikamiKoji MizutaniYoshiyuki SasakiTakanori IwataAkira AokiAdjunctive use of laser devices as high reactive-level laser/light therapy (HLLT) or photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for periodontal therapy is known to be more effective on suppressing pain than conventional therapy, however, there are no systematic reviews addressed its effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the following clinical question (CQ): does adjunctive use of lasers with conventional therapy suppress the pain associated with periodontal treatment? A systematic and extensive literature search was performed to summarize the currently available knowledge to answer the CQ using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted before June 2020. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane tool for the risk of bias evaluation. A meta-analysis was performed on quantitative evaluation of pain control based on patient-reported outcomes. After an independent screening of 165 initial records, ten RCTs were included. Six of them focused on surgical procedures and the others on non-surgical periodontal pocket therapy. The protocols of HLLT, PBMT, and combination with HLLT and PBMT were employed in five, four and one RCTs, respectively. Following the assessment of bias risk, it is revealed that all RCTs had methodological weaknesses regarding the blinding of key personnel, although other bias risk factors were not evident. Meta-analysis showed that HLLT using erbium lasers significantly reduced the patient-reported pain immediately after treatment (two RCTs, p < 0.0001), while PBMT using diode lasers significantly reduced pain 2-7 days after treatment (two RCTs, p < 0.0001 to p = 0.03). The presented systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the alternative use of HLLT using erbium lasers to conventional instrumentation can significantly suppress postoperative pain and that intraoperative or postoperative PBMT using diode lasers combined with periodontal surgery can significantly reduce postoperative pain. However, the evidence is still insufficient and more well-designed RCTs are required.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238659
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Risako Mikami
Koji Mizutani
Yoshiyuki Sasaki
Takanori Iwata
Akira Aoki
spellingShingle Risako Mikami
Koji Mizutani
Yoshiyuki Sasaki
Takanori Iwata
Akira Aoki
Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Risako Mikami
Koji Mizutani
Yoshiyuki Sasaki
Takanori Iwata
Akira Aoki
author_sort Risako Mikami
title Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort patient-reported outcomes of laser-assisted pain control following non-surgical and surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Adjunctive use of laser devices as high reactive-level laser/light therapy (HLLT) or photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for periodontal therapy is known to be more effective on suppressing pain than conventional therapy, however, there are no systematic reviews addressed its effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the following clinical question (CQ): does adjunctive use of lasers with conventional therapy suppress the pain associated with periodontal treatment? A systematic and extensive literature search was performed to summarize the currently available knowledge to answer the CQ using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted before June 2020. Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane tool for the risk of bias evaluation. A meta-analysis was performed on quantitative evaluation of pain control based on patient-reported outcomes. After an independent screening of 165 initial records, ten RCTs were included. Six of them focused on surgical procedures and the others on non-surgical periodontal pocket therapy. The protocols of HLLT, PBMT, and combination with HLLT and PBMT were employed in five, four and one RCTs, respectively. Following the assessment of bias risk, it is revealed that all RCTs had methodological weaknesses regarding the blinding of key personnel, although other bias risk factors were not evident. Meta-analysis showed that HLLT using erbium lasers significantly reduced the patient-reported pain immediately after treatment (two RCTs, p < 0.0001), while PBMT using diode lasers significantly reduced pain 2-7 days after treatment (two RCTs, p < 0.0001 to p = 0.03). The presented systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the alternative use of HLLT using erbium lasers to conventional instrumentation can significantly suppress postoperative pain and that intraoperative or postoperative PBMT using diode lasers combined with periodontal surgery can significantly reduce postoperative pain. However, the evidence is still insufficient and more well-designed RCTs are required.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238659
work_keys_str_mv AT risakomikami patientreportedoutcomesoflaserassistedpaincontrolfollowingnonsurgicalandsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kojimizutani patientreportedoutcomesoflaserassistedpaincontrolfollowingnonsurgicalandsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshiyukisasaki patientreportedoutcomesoflaserassistedpaincontrolfollowingnonsurgicalandsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takanoriiwata patientreportedoutcomesoflaserassistedpaincontrolfollowingnonsurgicalandsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT akiraaoki patientreportedoutcomesoflaserassistedpaincontrolfollowingnonsurgicalandsurgicalperiodontaltherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1714813553936957440