A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
Abstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex diffe...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Biology of Sex Differences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4 |
id |
doaj-25c373f01d994ea4bcce1f80dc0cfee0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-25c373f01d994ea4bcce1f80dc0cfee02021-05-30T11:52:06ZengBMCBiology of Sex Differences2042-64102021-05-0112111410.1186/s13293-021-00381-4A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placentaAmy M. Inkster0Victor Yuan1Chaini Konwar2Allison M. Matthews3Carolyn J. Brown4Wendy P. Robinson5BC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British ColumbiaBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteAbstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the uncomplicated term placenta (n = 343) using the Illumina 450K array. Results At a false discovery rate < 0.05 and a mean sex difference in DNAme beta value of > 0.10, we identified 162 autosomal CpG sites that were differentially methylated by sex and replicated in an independent cohort of samples (n = 293). Several of these differentially methylated CpG sites were part of larger correlated regions of sex differential DNAme. Although global DNAme levels did not differ by sex, the majority of significantly differentially methylated CpGs were more highly methylated in male placentae, the opposite of what is seen in differential methylation analyses of somatic tissues. Patterns of autosomal DNAme at these 162 CpGs were significantly associated with maternal age (in males) and newborn birthweight standard deviation (in females). Conclusions Our results provide a comprehensive analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the term human placenta. We report a list of high-confidence autosomal sex-associated differentially methylated CpGs and identify several key features of these loci that suggest their relevance to sex differences observed in normative and complicated pregnancies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4DNA methylationPlacentaSex as a biological variableSex differencesMicroarrayIllumina 450K array |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amy M. Inkster Victor Yuan Chaini Konwar Allison M. Matthews Carolyn J. Brown Wendy P. Robinson |
spellingShingle |
Amy M. Inkster Victor Yuan Chaini Konwar Allison M. Matthews Carolyn J. Brown Wendy P. Robinson A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta Biology of Sex Differences DNA methylation Placenta Sex as a biological variable Sex differences Microarray Illumina 450K array |
author_facet |
Amy M. Inkster Victor Yuan Chaini Konwar Allison M. Matthews Carolyn J. Brown Wendy P. Robinson |
author_sort |
Amy M. Inkster |
title |
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
title_short |
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
title_full |
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
title_fullStr |
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
title_full_unstemmed |
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
title_sort |
cross-cohort analysis of autosomal dna methylation sex differences in the term placenta |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Biology of Sex Differences |
issn |
2042-6410 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the uncomplicated term placenta (n = 343) using the Illumina 450K array. Results At a false discovery rate < 0.05 and a mean sex difference in DNAme beta value of > 0.10, we identified 162 autosomal CpG sites that were differentially methylated by sex and replicated in an independent cohort of samples (n = 293). Several of these differentially methylated CpG sites were part of larger correlated regions of sex differential DNAme. Although global DNAme levels did not differ by sex, the majority of significantly differentially methylated CpGs were more highly methylated in male placentae, the opposite of what is seen in differential methylation analyses of somatic tissues. Patterns of autosomal DNAme at these 162 CpGs were significantly associated with maternal age (in males) and newborn birthweight standard deviation (in females). Conclusions Our results provide a comprehensive analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the term human placenta. We report a list of high-confidence autosomal sex-associated differentially methylated CpGs and identify several key features of these loci that suggest their relevance to sex differences observed in normative and complicated pregnancies. |
topic |
DNA methylation Placenta Sex as a biological variable Sex differences Microarray Illumina 450K array |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amyminkster acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT victoryuan acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT chainikonwar acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT allisonmmatthews acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT carolynjbrown acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT wendyprobinson acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT amyminkster crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT victoryuan crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT chainikonwar crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT allisonmmatthews crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT carolynjbrown crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta AT wendyprobinson crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta |
_version_ |
1721419900821438464 |