A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta

Abstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy M. Inkster, Victor Yuan, Chaini Konwar, Allison M. Matthews, Carolyn J. Brown, Wendy P. Robinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Biology of Sex Differences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4
id doaj-25c373f01d994ea4bcce1f80dc0cfee0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25c373f01d994ea4bcce1f80dc0cfee02021-05-30T11:52:06ZengBMCBiology of Sex Differences2042-64102021-05-0112111410.1186/s13293-021-00381-4A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placentaAmy M. Inkster0Victor Yuan1Chaini Konwar2Allison M. Matthews3Carolyn J. Brown4Wendy P. Robinson5BC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British ColumbiaBC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteAbstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the uncomplicated term placenta (n = 343) using the Illumina 450K array. Results At a false discovery rate < 0.05 and a mean sex difference in DNAme beta value of > 0.10, we identified 162 autosomal CpG sites that were differentially methylated by sex and replicated in an independent cohort of samples (n = 293). Several of these differentially methylated CpG sites were part of larger correlated regions of sex differential DNAme. Although global DNAme levels did not differ by sex, the majority of significantly differentially methylated CpGs were more highly methylated in male placentae, the opposite of what is seen in differential methylation analyses of somatic tissues. Patterns of autosomal DNAme at these 162 CpGs were significantly associated with maternal age (in males) and newborn birthweight standard deviation (in females). Conclusions Our results provide a comprehensive analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the term human placenta. We report a list of high-confidence autosomal sex-associated differentially methylated CpGs and identify several key features of these loci that suggest their relevance to sex differences observed in normative and complicated pregnancies.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4DNA methylationPlacentaSex as a biological variableSex differencesMicroarrayIllumina 450K array
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy M. Inkster
Victor Yuan
Chaini Konwar
Allison M. Matthews
Carolyn J. Brown
Wendy P. Robinson
spellingShingle Amy M. Inkster
Victor Yuan
Chaini Konwar
Allison M. Matthews
Carolyn J. Brown
Wendy P. Robinson
A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
Biology of Sex Differences
DNA methylation
Placenta
Sex as a biological variable
Sex differences
Microarray
Illumina 450K array
author_facet Amy M. Inkster
Victor Yuan
Chaini Konwar
Allison M. Matthews
Carolyn J. Brown
Wendy P. Robinson
author_sort Amy M. Inkster
title A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
title_short A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
title_full A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
title_fullStr A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
title_full_unstemmed A cross-cohort analysis of autosomal DNA methylation sex differences in the term placenta
title_sort cross-cohort analysis of autosomal dna methylation sex differences in the term placenta
publisher BMC
series Biology of Sex Differences
issn 2042-6410
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Human placental DNA methylation (DNAme) data is a valuable resource for studying sex differences during gestation, as DNAme profiles after delivery reflect the cumulative effects of gene expression patterns and exposures across gestation. Here, we present an analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the uncomplicated term placenta (n = 343) using the Illumina 450K array. Results At a false discovery rate < 0.05 and a mean sex difference in DNAme beta value of > 0.10, we identified 162 autosomal CpG sites that were differentially methylated by sex and replicated in an independent cohort of samples (n = 293). Several of these differentially methylated CpG sites were part of larger correlated regions of sex differential DNAme. Although global DNAme levels did not differ by sex, the majority of significantly differentially methylated CpGs were more highly methylated in male placentae, the opposite of what is seen in differential methylation analyses of somatic tissues. Patterns of autosomal DNAme at these 162 CpGs were significantly associated with maternal age (in males) and newborn birthweight standard deviation (in females). Conclusions Our results provide a comprehensive analysis of sex differences in autosomal DNAme in the term human placenta. We report a list of high-confidence autosomal sex-associated differentially methylated CpGs and identify several key features of these loci that suggest their relevance to sex differences observed in normative and complicated pregnancies.
topic DNA methylation
Placenta
Sex as a biological variable
Sex differences
Microarray
Illumina 450K array
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-021-00381-4
work_keys_str_mv AT amyminkster acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT victoryuan acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT chainikonwar acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT allisonmmatthews acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT carolynjbrown acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT wendyprobinson acrosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT amyminkster crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT victoryuan crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT chainikonwar crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT allisonmmatthews crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT carolynjbrown crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
AT wendyprobinson crosscohortanalysisofautosomaldnamethylationsexdifferencesinthetermplacenta
_version_ 1721419900821438464