Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class

This study, conducted in a 300-level college French class with15 students, builds on previous research on symbolic competence (Kramsch, 2009, 2011). Using a film scene and a “Semiotic Gap Activity,” we examine how students construct meaning. What do students prioritize? What do they bring from thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corinne Étienne, Sylvie Vanbaelen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2017-01-01
Series:L2 Journal
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dz8m9bz#main
id doaj-25b6f2df56ad4aa4adf1014508793c17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25b6f2df56ad4aa4adf1014508793c172020-11-24T22:08:38ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaL2 Journal1945-02221945-02222017-01-01926383Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French ClassCorinne Étienne0Sylvie Vanbaelen1University of Massachusetts-BostonButler UniversityThis study, conducted in a 300-level college French class with15 students, builds on previous research on symbolic competence (Kramsch, 2009, 2011). Using a film scene and a “Semiotic Gap Activity,” we examine how students construct meaning. What do students prioritize? What do they bring from their past symbolic representations? Are they aware of their own perspectives? What do they gain from the activity? Students were divided into three groups. Each group worked on only one component of the scene (soundtrack and script; subtitles; or scene without sound) and stretched its imagination to answer a questionnaire about the meaning of the scene compensating for the semiotic gap. Groups shared their findings before they viewed the original scene with all components present. Finally, students responded to a Post-Viewing Questionnaire . Data originated from answers to the questionnaires and instructor’s notes. Findings showed students’ minute description of their component. However, when constructing meaning and filling the gap, they appealed to myths deeply rooted in their schema of French culture, which contradicted their actual observations. In doing so they often confidently positioned themselves as knowers of both cultures. We discuss pedagogical implications and make suggestions to continue developing students’ semiotic awareness and symbolic competence.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dz8m9bz#main
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Corinne Étienne
Sylvie Vanbaelen
spellingShingle Corinne Étienne
Sylvie Vanbaelen
Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
L2 Journal
author_facet Corinne Étienne
Sylvie Vanbaelen
author_sort Corinne Étienne
title Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
title_short Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
title_full Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
title_fullStr Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Symbolic Competence: Constructing Meaning(s) and Stretching Cultural Imagination in an Intermediate College-Level French Class
title_sort exploring symbolic competence: constructing meaning(s) and stretching cultural imagination in an intermediate college-level french class
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series L2 Journal
issn 1945-0222
1945-0222
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This study, conducted in a 300-level college French class with15 students, builds on previous research on symbolic competence (Kramsch, 2009, 2011). Using a film scene and a “Semiotic Gap Activity,” we examine how students construct meaning. What do students prioritize? What do they bring from their past symbolic representations? Are they aware of their own perspectives? What do they gain from the activity? Students were divided into three groups. Each group worked on only one component of the scene (soundtrack and script; subtitles; or scene without sound) and stretched its imagination to answer a questionnaire about the meaning of the scene compensating for the semiotic gap. Groups shared their findings before they viewed the original scene with all components present. Finally, students responded to a Post-Viewing Questionnaire . Data originated from answers to the questionnaires and instructor’s notes. Findings showed students’ minute description of their component. However, when constructing meaning and filling the gap, they appealed to myths deeply rooted in their schema of French culture, which contradicted their actual observations. In doing so they often confidently positioned themselves as knowers of both cultures. We discuss pedagogical implications and make suggestions to continue developing students’ semiotic awareness and symbolic competence.
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dz8m9bz#main
work_keys_str_mv AT corinneetienne exploringsymboliccompetenceconstructingmeaningsandstretchingculturalimaginationinanintermediatecollegelevelfrenchclass
AT sylvievanbaelen exploringsymboliccompetenceconstructingmeaningsandstretchingculturalimaginationinanintermediatecollegelevelfrenchclass
_version_ 1725815551003983872