Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review

Background: Solar urticaria is a rare type of inducible urticaria characterized by wheal and erythema formation shortly after exposure to sunlight or to an artificial light source; its pathophysiology is not yet entirely understood. The treatment of choice, in addition to exposure avoidance, consist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María Raigoza, Yuliana Toro, Jorge Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Colegio Mexicano de Inmunología Clínica y Alergia, A.C. 2017-10-01
Series:Revista Alergia México
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistaalergia.mx/ojs/index.php/ram/article/view/202
id doaj-25b14ee7e4fd42a0a5196cbf3d649b34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25b14ee7e4fd42a0a5196cbf3d649b342020-11-25T00:14:07ZspaColegio Mexicano de Inmunología Clínica y Alergia, A.C.Revista Alergia México0002-51512448-91902017-10-0164337137510.29262/ram.v64i3.202196Solar urticaria. Case report and literature reviewMaría Raigoza0Yuliana Toro1Jorge Sánchez2Universidad de Antioquia, IPS Universitaria, Grupo de Alergología Clínica y Experimental, MedellínUniversidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Alergología Clínica y Experimental, MedellínUniversidad de Antioquia, Grupo de Alergología Clínica y Experimental, MedellínBackground: Solar urticaria is a rare type of inducible urticaria characterized by wheal and erythema formation shortly after exposure to sunlight or to an artificial light source; its pathophysiology is not yet entirely understood. The treatment of choice, in addition to exposure avoidance, consists in antihistamine administration. Clinical case: This is the case of a 27-year-old woman with no personal history of allergic diseases and with a 2-year history of erythema and wheals in photo-exposed areas associated with sunlight exposure for periods longer than 10 minutes. A provocation test was carried out; she was started on fexofenadine at 4-fold the standard dose (720 mg/day). Six weeks later, a new challenge was carried out without the antihistamine being discontinued; the reaction was less severe, but she continued with erythema for the first 60 minutes post-exposure. After 3 months on high-dose antihistamines, she referred marked improvement in her quality of life and tolerance to brief sunlight exposure (for less than 15 minutes). Conclusions: Given the knowledge there is about the proposed pathophysiological mechanism for this condition, maybe individuals with solar urticaria could benefit from anti-IgE monoclonal antibody-based therapy.http://revistaalergia.mx/ojs/index.php/ram/article/view/202AntihistaminesFotosensibilidadUrticaria Solarfoto-test.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author María Raigoza
Yuliana Toro
Jorge Sánchez
spellingShingle María Raigoza
Yuliana Toro
Jorge Sánchez
Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
Revista Alergia México
Antihistamines
Fotosensibilidad
Urticaria Solar
foto-test.
author_facet María Raigoza
Yuliana Toro
Jorge Sánchez
author_sort María Raigoza
title Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
title_short Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
title_full Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
title_fullStr Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Solar urticaria. Case report and literature review
title_sort solar urticaria. case report and literature review
publisher Colegio Mexicano de Inmunología Clínica y Alergia, A.C.
series Revista Alergia México
issn 0002-5151
2448-9190
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Background: Solar urticaria is a rare type of inducible urticaria characterized by wheal and erythema formation shortly after exposure to sunlight or to an artificial light source; its pathophysiology is not yet entirely understood. The treatment of choice, in addition to exposure avoidance, consists in antihistamine administration. Clinical case: This is the case of a 27-year-old woman with no personal history of allergic diseases and with a 2-year history of erythema and wheals in photo-exposed areas associated with sunlight exposure for periods longer than 10 minutes. A provocation test was carried out; she was started on fexofenadine at 4-fold the standard dose (720 mg/day). Six weeks later, a new challenge was carried out without the antihistamine being discontinued; the reaction was less severe, but she continued with erythema for the first 60 minutes post-exposure. After 3 months on high-dose antihistamines, she referred marked improvement in her quality of life and tolerance to brief sunlight exposure (for less than 15 minutes). Conclusions: Given the knowledge there is about the proposed pathophysiological mechanism for this condition, maybe individuals with solar urticaria could benefit from anti-IgE monoclonal antibody-based therapy.
topic Antihistamines
Fotosensibilidad
Urticaria Solar
foto-test.
url http://revistaalergia.mx/ojs/index.php/ram/article/view/202
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaraigoza solarurticariacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yulianatoro solarurticariacasereportandliteraturereview
AT jorgesanchez solarurticariacasereportandliteraturereview
_version_ 1725391490439446528