Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly

How neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural computation. Two alternative mechanisms have been discussed in the literature so far: preferred direction enhancement, by which responses are amplified when stimuli move along the preferred directio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juergen Haag, Alexander Arenz, Etienne Serbe, Fabrizio Gabbiani, Alexander Borst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2016-08-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/17421
id doaj-25ab690db3084419a832243a252332ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25ab690db3084419a832243a252332ce2021-05-05T00:31:30ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2016-08-01510.7554/eLife.17421Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the flyJuergen Haag0Alexander Arenz1Etienne Serbe2Fabrizio Gabbiani3Alexander Borst4Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, GermanyMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, GermanyMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, GermanyBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, United StatesMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, GermanyHow neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural computation. Two alternative mechanisms have been discussed in the literature so far: preferred direction enhancement, by which responses are amplified when stimuli move along the preferred direction of the cell, and null direction suppression, where one signal inhibits the response to the subsequent one when stimuli move along the opposite, i.e. null direction. Along the processing chain in the Drosophila optic lobe, directional responses first appear in T4 and T5 cells. Visually stimulating sequences of individual columns in the optic lobe with a telescope while recording from single T4 neurons, we find both mechanisms at work implemented in different sub-regions of the receptive field. This finding explains the high degree of directional selectivity found already in the fly’s primary motion-sensing neurons and marks an important step in our understanding of elementary motion detection.https://elifesciences.org/articles/17421motion visionNeurogeneticscomputer model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juergen Haag
Alexander Arenz
Etienne Serbe
Fabrizio Gabbiani
Alexander Borst
spellingShingle Juergen Haag
Alexander Arenz
Etienne Serbe
Fabrizio Gabbiani
Alexander Borst
Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
eLife
motion vision
Neurogenetics
computer model
author_facet Juergen Haag
Alexander Arenz
Etienne Serbe
Fabrizio Gabbiani
Alexander Borst
author_sort Juergen Haag
title Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
title_short Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
title_full Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
title_fullStr Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
title_full_unstemmed Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
title_sort complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2016-08-01
description How neurons become sensitive to the direction of visual motion represents a classic example of neural computation. Two alternative mechanisms have been discussed in the literature so far: preferred direction enhancement, by which responses are amplified when stimuli move along the preferred direction of the cell, and null direction suppression, where one signal inhibits the response to the subsequent one when stimuli move along the opposite, i.e. null direction. Along the processing chain in the Drosophila optic lobe, directional responses first appear in T4 and T5 cells. Visually stimulating sequences of individual columns in the optic lobe with a telescope while recording from single T4 neurons, we find both mechanisms at work implemented in different sub-regions of the receptive field. This finding explains the high degree of directional selectivity found already in the fly’s primary motion-sensing neurons and marks an important step in our understanding of elementary motion detection.
topic motion vision
Neurogenetics
computer model
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/17421
work_keys_str_mv AT juergenhaag complementarymechanismscreatedirectionselectivityinthefly
AT alexanderarenz complementarymechanismscreatedirectionselectivityinthefly
AT etienneserbe complementarymechanismscreatedirectionselectivityinthefly
AT fabriziogabbiani complementarymechanismscreatedirectionselectivityinthefly
AT alexanderborst complementarymechanismscreatedirectionselectivityinthefly
_version_ 1721476233704767488