Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie
In this article certain presuppositions of the innateness hypothesis of the TGG are judged by comparing it to aspects from the philosophy of Dooyeweerd. It is indicated that: (i) the TGG as well as Dooyeweerd postulates a radical structural distinction between man and animal but on different grounds...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
Scriber Editorial Systems
1996-03-01
|
Series: | Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship |
Online Access: | https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/588 |
id |
doaj-25a87e9f641b4c9ba7adb4ae9109994b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-25a87e9f641b4c9ba7adb4ae9109994b2020-11-25T01:11:20ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85571996-03-0161110.4102/koers.v61i1.588Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofieA.W. Coetzee0Dept. Klassieke & Semitistiek Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHO POTCHEFSTROOMIn this article certain presuppositions of the innateness hypothesis of the TGG are judged by comparing it to aspects from the philosophy of Dooyeweerd. It is indicated that: (i) the TGG as well as Dooyeweerd postulates a radical structural distinction between man and animal but on different grounds; (ii) the intertwined unity of human nature is not fully recognised by the TGG; (iii) the complementary role o f man and reality in determining the structure of knowledge is acknowledged by both the TGG and Dooyeweerd. On these grounds it is stated that the TGG can not uncritically be accommodated into Dooyeweerd's philosophical framework.https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/588 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Afrikaans |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A.W. Coetzee |
spellingShingle |
A.W. Coetzee Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship |
author_facet |
A.W. Coetzee |
author_sort |
A.W. Coetzee |
title |
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie |
title_short |
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie |
title_full |
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie |
title_fullStr |
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie |
title_sort |
die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die tgg en dooyeweerd se filosofie |
publisher |
Scriber Editorial Systems |
series |
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship |
issn |
0023-270X 2304-8557 |
publishDate |
1996-03-01 |
description |
In this article certain presuppositions of the innateness hypothesis of the TGG are judged by comparing it to aspects from the philosophy of Dooyeweerd. It is indicated that: (i) the TGG as well as Dooyeweerd postulates a radical structural distinction between man and animal but on different grounds; (ii) the intertwined unity of human nature is not fully recognised by the TGG; (iii) the complementary role o f man and reality in determining the structure of knowledge is acknowledged by both the TGG and Dooyeweerd. On these grounds it is stated that the TGG can not uncritically be accommodated into Dooyeweerd's philosophical framework. |
url |
https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/588 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT awcoetzee dieingeborenheidhipotesevandietggendooyeweerdsefilosofie |
_version_ |
1725171637420032000 |