A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES

The original biophysical profile is time consuming and costly. This study was performed to compare diagnostic value of the original fetal biophysical profile to the modified biophysical profile. Patients were selected from high risk pregnancies referred for fetal assessment and were randomly assigne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Jamal, V. Marsoosi, L. Eslamian K. Noori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2007-06-01
Series:Acta Medica Iranica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3271
id doaj-25a492b5fda64e6abbbacd6ae21d56a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25a492b5fda64e6abbbacd6ae21d56a92020-11-25T02:52:02ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesActa Medica Iranica0044-60251735-96942007-06-01453A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES A. Jamal0 V. Marsoosi1 L. Eslamian K. Noori2 The original biophysical profile is time consuming and costly. This study was performed to compare diagnostic value of the original fetal biophysical profile to the modified biophysical profile. Patients were selected from high risk pregnancies referred for fetal assessment and were randomly assigned to two groups. The measures of outcomes were perinatal mortality, Cesarean section for abnormal test, meconium-stained amniotic fluid and 5-minute Apgar score < 7. Diagnostic values of tests were assessed in terms of the incidence of abnormal outcome. In addition comparisons between the positive and negative predictive values of each of these tests as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the tests were reviewed. A total of 200 patients were entered into the study; 104 pregnancies were managed by the original biophysical profile and 96 pregnancies by the modified biophysical profile. There were 30 abnormal (31.3%) in modified biophysical profile and 24 (23.1%) abnormal tests in original one. There was significant difference in the incidence of meconium passage between two groups. Cesarean section for abnormal tests was 27 of 30 abnormal test (90%) in modified and 22 of 24 (91.6%) in original profile that was similar in both groups. There was not significant difference in Apgar score < 7 between two groups. We did not find significant difference with comparison of the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of two tests for all measures of outcome except the positive predictive value of meconium passage. Original biophysical profile is more costly and time consuming than modified one. https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3271Modified biophysical profileHigh risk pregnancy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Jamal
V. Marsoosi
L. Eslamian K. Noori
spellingShingle A. Jamal
V. Marsoosi
L. Eslamian K. Noori
A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
Acta Medica Iranica
Modified biophysical profile
High risk pregnancy
author_facet A. Jamal
V. Marsoosi
L. Eslamian K. Noori
author_sort A. Jamal
title A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
title_short A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
title_full A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
title_fullStr A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
title_full_unstemmed A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF THE FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE VERSUS MODIFIED BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RISK PREGNANCIES
title_sort prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus modified biophysical profile in the management of high risk pregnancies
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Acta Medica Iranica
issn 0044-6025
1735-9694
publishDate 2007-06-01
description The original biophysical profile is time consuming and costly. This study was performed to compare diagnostic value of the original fetal biophysical profile to the modified biophysical profile. Patients were selected from high risk pregnancies referred for fetal assessment and were randomly assigned to two groups. The measures of outcomes were perinatal mortality, Cesarean section for abnormal test, meconium-stained amniotic fluid and 5-minute Apgar score < 7. Diagnostic values of tests were assessed in terms of the incidence of abnormal outcome. In addition comparisons between the positive and negative predictive values of each of these tests as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the tests were reviewed. A total of 200 patients were entered into the study; 104 pregnancies were managed by the original biophysical profile and 96 pregnancies by the modified biophysical profile. There were 30 abnormal (31.3%) in modified biophysical profile and 24 (23.1%) abnormal tests in original one. There was significant difference in the incidence of meconium passage between two groups. Cesarean section for abnormal tests was 27 of 30 abnormal test (90%) in modified and 22 of 24 (91.6%) in original profile that was similar in both groups. There was not significant difference in Apgar score < 7 between two groups. We did not find significant difference with comparison of the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of two tests for all measures of outcome except the positive predictive value of meconium passage. Original biophysical profile is more costly and time consuming than modified one.
topic Modified biophysical profile
High risk pregnancy
url https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3271
work_keys_str_mv AT ajamal aprospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
AT vmarsoosi aprospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
AT leslamianknoori aprospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
AT ajamal prospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
AT vmarsoosi prospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
AT leslamianknoori prospectivetrialofthefetalbiophysicalprofileversusmodifiedbiophysicalprofileinthemanagementofhighriskpregnancies
_version_ 1724731861767290880