Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming

Norepinephrine and dopamine are both believed to affect signal-to-noise in the cerebral cortex. Dopaminergic agents appear to modulate semantic networks during indirect semantic priming, but do not appear to affect problem solving dependent on access to semantic networks. Noradrenergic agents, thoug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacquelyne S. Cios, Regan F. Miller, Ashleigh Hillier, Madalina E. Tivarus, David Q. Beversdorf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2009-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2009-0236
id doaj-259b37764b3b493b82df8df37251d781
record_format Article
spelling doaj-259b37764b3b493b82df8df37251d7812021-07-02T10:08:50ZengHindawi LimitedBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842009-01-01213-413714310.3233/BEN-2009-0236Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic PrimingJacquelyne S. Cios0Regan F. Miller1Ashleigh Hillier2Madalina E. Tivarus3David Q. Beversdorf4Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USADepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USADepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USADepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USADepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USANorepinephrine and dopamine are both believed to affect signal-to-noise in the cerebral cortex. Dopaminergic agents appear to modulate semantic networks during indirect semantic priming, but do not appear to affect problem solving dependent on access to semantic networks. Noradrenergic agents, though, do affect semantic network dependent problem solving. We wished to examine whether noradrenergic agents affect indirect semantic priming. Subjects attended three sessions: one each after propranolol (40 mg) (noradrenergic antagonist), ephedrine (25 mg) (noradrenergic agonist), and placebo. During each session, closely related, distantly related, and unrelated pairs were presented. Reaction times for a lexical decision task on the target words (second word in the pair) were recorded. No decrease in indirect semantic priming occurred with ephedrine. Furthermore, across all three drugs, a main effect of semantic relatedness was found, but no main effect of drug, and no drug/semantic relatedness interaction effect. These findings suggest that noradrenergic agents, with these drugs and at these doses, do not affect indirect semantic priming with the potency of dopaminergic drugs at the doses previously studied. In the context of this previous work, this suggests that more automatic processes such as priming and more controlled searches of the lexical and semantic networks such as problem solving may be mediated, at least in part, by distinct mechanisms with differing effects of pharmacological modulation.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2009-0236
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacquelyne S. Cios
Regan F. Miller
Ashleigh Hillier
Madalina E. Tivarus
David Q. Beversdorf
spellingShingle Jacquelyne S. Cios
Regan F. Miller
Ashleigh Hillier
Madalina E. Tivarus
David Q. Beversdorf
Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
Behavioural Neurology
author_facet Jacquelyne S. Cios
Regan F. Miller
Ashleigh Hillier
Madalina E. Tivarus
David Q. Beversdorf
author_sort Jacquelyne S. Cios
title Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
title_short Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
title_full Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
title_fullStr Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Noradrenergic Modulation of Indirect Semantic Priming
title_sort lack of noradrenergic modulation of indirect semantic priming
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Behavioural Neurology
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Norepinephrine and dopamine are both believed to affect signal-to-noise in the cerebral cortex. Dopaminergic agents appear to modulate semantic networks during indirect semantic priming, but do not appear to affect problem solving dependent on access to semantic networks. Noradrenergic agents, though, do affect semantic network dependent problem solving. We wished to examine whether noradrenergic agents affect indirect semantic priming. Subjects attended three sessions: one each after propranolol (40 mg) (noradrenergic antagonist), ephedrine (25 mg) (noradrenergic agonist), and placebo. During each session, closely related, distantly related, and unrelated pairs were presented. Reaction times for a lexical decision task on the target words (second word in the pair) were recorded. No decrease in indirect semantic priming occurred with ephedrine. Furthermore, across all three drugs, a main effect of semantic relatedness was found, but no main effect of drug, and no drug/semantic relatedness interaction effect. These findings suggest that noradrenergic agents, with these drugs and at these doses, do not affect indirect semantic priming with the potency of dopaminergic drugs at the doses previously studied. In the context of this previous work, this suggests that more automatic processes such as priming and more controlled searches of the lexical and semantic networks such as problem solving may be mediated, at least in part, by distinct mechanisms with differing effects of pharmacological modulation.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2009-0236
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquelynescios lackofnoradrenergicmodulationofindirectsemanticpriming
AT reganfmiller lackofnoradrenergicmodulationofindirectsemanticpriming
AT ashleighhillier lackofnoradrenergicmodulationofindirectsemanticpriming
AT madalinaetivarus lackofnoradrenergicmodulationofindirectsemanticpriming
AT davidqbeversdorf lackofnoradrenergicmodulationofindirectsemanticpriming
_version_ 1721332312454463488