Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz

Abstract A θ 13 oscillation analysis based on the observed antineutrino rates at the Double Chooz far and near detectors for different reactor power conditions is presented. This approach provides a so far unique simultaneous determination of θ 13 and the total background rates without relying on an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: The Double Chooz collaboration, T. Abrahão, H. Almazan, J. C. dos Anjos, S. Appel, J. C. Barriere, I. Bekman, T. J. C. Bezerra, L. Bezrukov, E. Blucher, T. Brugière, C. Buck, J. Busenitz, A. Cabrera, M. Cerrada, E. Chauveau, P. Chimenti, O. Corpace, J. V. Dawson, Z. Djurcic, A. Etenko, H. Furuta, I. Gil-Botella, A. Givaudan, H. Gomez, L. F. G. Gonzalez, M. C. Goodman, T. Hara, J. Haser, D. Hellwig, A. Hourlier, M. Ishitsuka, J. Jochum, C. Jollet, K. Kale, M. Kaneda, M. Karakac, T. Kawasaki, E. Kemp, H. de Kerret, D. Kryn, M. Kuze, T. Lachenmaier, C. E. Lane, T. Lasserre, C. Lastoria, D. Lhuillier, H. P. Lima, M. Lindner, J. M. López-Castaño, J. M. LoSecco, B. Lubsandorzhiev, J. Maeda, C. Mariani, J. Maricic, J. Martino, T. Matsubara, G. Mention, A. Meregaglia, T. Miletic, R. Milincic, A. Minotti, D. Navas-Nicolás, P. Novella, L. Oberauer, M. Obolensky, A. Onillon, A. Oralbaev, C. Palomares, I. M. Pepe, G. Pronost, J. Reichenbacher, B. Reinhold, S. Schönert, S. Schoppmann, L. Scola, R. Sharankova, V. Sibille, V. Sinev, M. Skorokhvatov, P. Soldin, A. Stahl, I. Stancu, L. F. F. Stokes, F. Suekane, S. Sukhotin, T. Sumiyoshi, Y. Sun, C. Veyssiere, B. Viaud, M. Vivier, S. Wagner, C. Wiebusch, G. Yang, F. Yermia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)190
id doaj-2596e084a0f14f61844a1cc0c28b9fd5
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author The Double Chooz collaboration
T. Abrahão
H. Almazan
J. C. dos Anjos
S. Appel
J. C. Barriere
I. Bekman
T. J. C. Bezerra
L. Bezrukov
E. Blucher
T. Brugière
C. Buck
J. Busenitz
A. Cabrera
M. Cerrada
E. Chauveau
P. Chimenti
O. Corpace
J. V. Dawson
Z. Djurcic
A. Etenko
H. Furuta
I. Gil-Botella
A. Givaudan
H. Gomez
L. F. G. Gonzalez
M. C. Goodman
T. Hara
J. Haser
D. Hellwig
A. Hourlier
M. Ishitsuka
J. Jochum
C. Jollet
K. Kale
M. Kaneda
M. Karakac
T. Kawasaki
E. Kemp
H. de Kerret
D. Kryn
M. Kuze
T. Lachenmaier
C. E. Lane
T. Lasserre
C. Lastoria
D. Lhuillier
H. P. Lima
M. Lindner
J. M. López-Castaño
J. M. LoSecco
B. Lubsandorzhiev
J. Maeda
C. Mariani
J. Maricic
J. Martino
T. Matsubara
G. Mention
A. Meregaglia
T. Miletic
R. Milincic
A. Minotti
D. Navas-Nicolás
P. Novella
L. Oberauer
M. Obolensky
A. Onillon
A. Oralbaev
C. Palomares
I. M. Pepe
G. Pronost
J. Reichenbacher
B. Reinhold
S. Schönert
S. Schoppmann
L. Scola
R. Sharankova
V. Sibille
V. Sinev
M. Skorokhvatov
P. Soldin
A. Stahl
I. Stancu
L. F. F. Stokes
F. Suekane
S. Sukhotin
T. Sumiyoshi
Y. Sun
C. Veyssiere
B. Viaud
M. Vivier
S. Wagner
C. Wiebusch
G. Yang
F. Yermia
spellingShingle The Double Chooz collaboration
T. Abrahão
H. Almazan
J. C. dos Anjos
S. Appel
J. C. Barriere
I. Bekman
T. J. C. Bezerra
L. Bezrukov
E. Blucher
T. Brugière
C. Buck
J. Busenitz
A. Cabrera
M. Cerrada
E. Chauveau
P. Chimenti
O. Corpace
J. V. Dawson
Z. Djurcic
A. Etenko
H. Furuta
I. Gil-Botella
A. Givaudan
H. Gomez
L. F. G. Gonzalez
M. C. Goodman
T. Hara
J. Haser
D. Hellwig
A. Hourlier
M. Ishitsuka
J. Jochum
C. Jollet
K. Kale
M. Kaneda
M. Karakac
T. Kawasaki
E. Kemp
H. de Kerret
D. Kryn
M. Kuze
T. Lachenmaier
C. E. Lane
T. Lasserre
C. Lastoria
D. Lhuillier
H. P. Lima
M. Lindner
J. M. López-Castaño
J. M. LoSecco
B. Lubsandorzhiev
J. Maeda
C. Mariani
J. Maricic
J. Martino
T. Matsubara
G. Mention
A. Meregaglia
T. Miletic
R. Milincic
A. Minotti
D. Navas-Nicolás
P. Novella
L. Oberauer
M. Obolensky
A. Onillon
A. Oralbaev
C. Palomares
I. M. Pepe
G. Pronost
J. Reichenbacher
B. Reinhold
S. Schönert
S. Schoppmann
L. Scola
R. Sharankova
V. Sibille
V. Sinev
M. Skorokhvatov
P. Soldin
A. Stahl
I. Stancu
L. F. F. Stokes
F. Suekane
S. Sukhotin
T. Sumiyoshi
Y. Sun
C. Veyssiere
B. Viaud
M. Vivier
S. Wagner
C. Wiebusch
G. Yang
F. Yermia
Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
Journal of High Energy Physics
Neutrino Detectors and Telescopes (experiments)
Oscillation
author_facet The Double Chooz collaboration
T. Abrahão
H. Almazan
J. C. dos Anjos
S. Appel
J. C. Barriere
I. Bekman
T. J. C. Bezerra
L. Bezrukov
E. Blucher
T. Brugière
C. Buck
J. Busenitz
A. Cabrera
M. Cerrada
E. Chauveau
P. Chimenti
O. Corpace
J. V. Dawson
Z. Djurcic
A. Etenko
H. Furuta
I. Gil-Botella
A. Givaudan
H. Gomez
L. F. G. Gonzalez
M. C. Goodman
T. Hara
J. Haser
D. Hellwig
A. Hourlier
M. Ishitsuka
J. Jochum
C. Jollet
K. Kale
M. Kaneda
M. Karakac
T. Kawasaki
E. Kemp
H. de Kerret
D. Kryn
M. Kuze
T. Lachenmaier
C. E. Lane
T. Lasserre
C. Lastoria
D. Lhuillier
H. P. Lima
M. Lindner
J. M. López-Castaño
J. M. LoSecco
B. Lubsandorzhiev
J. Maeda
C. Mariani
J. Maricic
J. Martino
T. Matsubara
G. Mention
A. Meregaglia
T. Miletic
R. Milincic
A. Minotti
D. Navas-Nicolás
P. Novella
L. Oberauer
M. Obolensky
A. Onillon
A. Oralbaev
C. Palomares
I. M. Pepe
G. Pronost
J. Reichenbacher
B. Reinhold
S. Schönert
S. Schoppmann
L. Scola
R. Sharankova
V. Sibille
V. Sinev
M. Skorokhvatov
P. Soldin
A. Stahl
I. Stancu
L. F. F. Stokes
F. Suekane
S. Sukhotin
T. Sumiyoshi
Y. Sun
C. Veyssiere
B. Viaud
M. Vivier
S. Wagner
C. Wiebusch
G. Yang
F. Yermia
author_sort The Double Chooz collaboration
title Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
title_short Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
title_full Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
title_fullStr Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
title_full_unstemmed Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz
title_sort reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in double chooz
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of High Energy Physics
issn 1029-8479
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract A θ 13 oscillation analysis based on the observed antineutrino rates at the Double Chooz far and near detectors for different reactor power conditions is presented. This approach provides a so far unique simultaneous determination of θ 13 and the total background rates without relying on any assumptions on the specific background contributions. The analysis comprises 865 days of data collected in both detectors with at least one reactor in operation. The oscillation results are enhanced by the use of 24.06 days (12.74 days) of reactor-off data in the far (near) detector. The analysis considers the ν ¯ e $$ {\overline{\nu}}_e $$ interactions up to a visible energy of 8.5 MeV, using the events at higher energies to build a cosmogenic background model considering fast-neutrons interactions and 9Li decays. The background-model-independent determination of the mixing angle yields sin2(2θ 13) = 0.094 ± 0.017, being the best-fit total background rates fully consistent with the cosmogenic background model. A second oscillation analysis is also performed constraining the total background rates to the cosmogenic background estimates. While the central value is not significantly modified due to the consistency between the reactor-off data and the background estimates, the addition of the background model reduces the uncertainty on θ 13 to 0.015. Along with the oscillation results, the normalization of the anti-neutrino rate is measured with a precision of 0.86%, reducing the 1.43% uncertainty associated to the expectation.
topic Neutrino Detectors and Telescopes (experiments)
Oscillation
url https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)190
work_keys_str_mv AT thedoublechoozcollaboration reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tabrahao reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT halmazan reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jcdosanjos reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT sappel reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jcbarriere reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ibekman reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tjcbezerra reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT lbezrukov reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT eblucher reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tbrugiere reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cbuck reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jbusenitz reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT acabrera reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mcerrada reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT echauveau reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT pchimenti reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ocorpace reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jvdawson reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT zdjurcic reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT aetenko reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT hfuruta reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT igilbotella reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT agivaudan reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT hgomez reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT lfggonzalez reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mcgoodman reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT thara reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jhaser reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT dhellwig reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ahourlier reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mishitsuka reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jjochum reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cjollet reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT kkale reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mkaneda reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mkarakac reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tkawasaki reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ekemp reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT hdekerret reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT dkryn reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mkuze reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tlachenmaier reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT celane reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tlasserre reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT clastoria reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT dlhuillier reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT hplima reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mlindner reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jmlopezcastano reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jmlosecco reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT blubsandorzhiev reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jmaeda reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cmariani reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jmaricic reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jmartino reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tmatsubara reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT gmention reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ameregaglia reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tmiletic reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT rmilincic reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT aminotti reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT dnavasnicolas reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT pnovella reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT loberauer reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mobolensky reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT aonillon reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT aoralbaev reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cpalomares reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT impepe reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT gpronost reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT jreichenbacher reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT breinhold reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT sschonert reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT sschoppmann reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT lscola reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT rsharankova reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT vsibille reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT vsinev reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mskorokhvatov reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT psoldin reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT astahl reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT istancu reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT lffstokes reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT fsuekane reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ssukhotin reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT tsumiyoshi reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT ysun reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cveyssiere reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT bviaud reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT mvivier reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT swagner reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT cwiebusch reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT gyang reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
AT fyermia reactorratemodulationoscillationanalysiswithtwodetectorsindoublechooz
_version_ 1724317367011377152
spelling doaj-2596e084a0f14f61844a1cc0c28b9fd52021-01-31T12:12:05ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792021-01-012021111810.1007/JHEP01(2021)190Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double ChoozThe Double Chooz collaborationT. Abrahão0H. Almazan1J. C. dos Anjos2S. Appel3J. C. Barriere4I. Bekman5T. J. C. Bezerra6L. Bezrukov7E. Blucher8T. Brugière9C. Buck10J. Busenitz11A. Cabrera12M. Cerrada13E. Chauveau14P. Chimenti15O. Corpace16J. V. Dawson17Z. Djurcic18A. Etenko19H. Furuta20I. Gil-Botella21A. Givaudan22H. Gomez23L. F. G. Gonzalez24M. C. Goodman25T. Hara26J. Haser27D. Hellwig28A. Hourlier29M. Ishitsuka30J. Jochum31C. Jollet32K. Kale33M. Kaneda34M. Karakac35T. Kawasaki36E. Kemp37H. de Kerret38D. Kryn39M. Kuze40T. Lachenmaier41C. E. Lane42T. Lasserre43C. Lastoria44D. Lhuillier45H. P. Lima46M. Lindner47J. M. López-Castaño48J. M. LoSecco49B. Lubsandorzhiev50J. Maeda51C. Mariani52J. Maricic53J. Martino54T. Matsubara55G. Mention56A. Meregaglia57T. Miletic58R. Milincic59A. Minotti60D. Navas-Nicolás61P. Novella62L. Oberauer63M. Obolensky64A. Onillon65A. Oralbaev66C. Palomares67I. M. Pepe68G. Pronost69J. Reichenbacher70B. Reinhold71S. Schönert72S. Schoppmann73L. Scola74R. Sharankova75V. Sibille76V. Sinev77M. Skorokhvatov78P. Soldin79A. Stahl80I. Stancu81L. F. F. Stokes82F. Suekane83S. Sukhotin84T. Sumiyoshi85Y. Sun86C. Veyssiere87B. Viaud88M. Vivier89S. Wagner90C. Wiebusch91G. Yang92F. Yermia93APC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieMax-Planck-Institut für KernphysikCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FísicasPhysik Department, Technische Universität MünchenIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayIII. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen UniversityDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of SussexInstitute of Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesThe Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of ChicagoIPHC, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de StrasbourgMax-Planck-Institut für KernphysikDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of AlabamaIJC Laboratory, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-SaclayCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, CIEMATUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS/IN2P3, CENBGUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieArgonne National LaboratoryNRC Kurchatov InstituteResearch Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku UniversityCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, CIEMATAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieUniversidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMPArgonne National LaboratoryDepartment of Physics, Kobe UniversityMax-Planck-Institut für KernphysikIII. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyTokyo University of ScienceKepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, Universität TübingenUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS/IN2P3, CENBGUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS/IN2P3, CENBGDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of TechnologyAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieDepartment of Physics, Kitasato UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Campinas-UNICAMPAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of TechnologyKepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, Universität TübingenDepartment of Physics, Drexel UniversityAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, CIEMATIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FísicasMax-Planck-Institut für KernphysikSouth Dakota School of Mines & TechnologyUniversity of Notre DameInstitute of Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesDepartment of Physics, Kobe UniversityCenter for Neutrino Physics, Virginia TechPhysics & Astronomy Department, University of Hawaii at ManoaSUBATECH, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de Nantes, IMT-AtlantiqueHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS/IN2P3, CENBGPhysics Department, Arcadia UniversityPhysics & Astronomy Department, University of Hawaii at ManoaLAPP, CNRS/IN2P3IJC Laboratory, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-SaclayInstituto de Física Corpuscular, IFIC (CSIC/UV)Physik Department, Technische Universität MünchenAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayNRC Kurchatov InstituteCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, CIEMATCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FísicasKamioka Observatory, ICRR, University of TokyoSouth Dakota School of Mines & TechnologyPhysics & Astronomy Department, University of Hawaii at ManoaPhysik Department, Technische Universität MünchenMax-Planck-Institut für KernphysikIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of TechnologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyInstitute of Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesNRC Kurchatov InstituteIII. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen UniversityIII. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen UniversityDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of AlabamaKepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, Universität TübingenAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieNRC Kurchatov InstituteDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityPhysics & Astronomy Department, University of Hawaii at ManoaIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclaySUBATECH, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de Nantes, IMT-AtlantiqueIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-SaclayAPC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieIII. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen UniversityState University of New York at Stony BrookSUBATECH, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de Nantes, IMT-AtlantiqueAbstract A θ 13 oscillation analysis based on the observed antineutrino rates at the Double Chooz far and near detectors for different reactor power conditions is presented. This approach provides a so far unique simultaneous determination of θ 13 and the total background rates without relying on any assumptions on the specific background contributions. The analysis comprises 865 days of data collected in both detectors with at least one reactor in operation. The oscillation results are enhanced by the use of 24.06 days (12.74 days) of reactor-off data in the far (near) detector. The analysis considers the ν ¯ e $$ {\overline{\nu}}_e $$ interactions up to a visible energy of 8.5 MeV, using the events at higher energies to build a cosmogenic background model considering fast-neutrons interactions and 9Li decays. The background-model-independent determination of the mixing angle yields sin2(2θ 13) = 0.094 ± 0.017, being the best-fit total background rates fully consistent with the cosmogenic background model. A second oscillation analysis is also performed constraining the total background rates to the cosmogenic background estimates. While the central value is not significantly modified due to the consistency between the reactor-off data and the background estimates, the addition of the background model reduces the uncertainty on θ 13 to 0.015. Along with the oscillation results, the normalization of the anti-neutrino rate is measured with a precision of 0.86%, reducing the 1.43% uncertainty associated to the expectation.https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)190Neutrino Detectors and Telescopes (experiments)Oscillation