Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler

Background: Nonsurgical aesthetic treatments are usually preferred by patients because their effects are visible immediately after the treatment and patients can return to their normal activities on the same day. Although many studies have indicated safety and efficacy of filler injection to improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raffaele Rauso, Giuseppe Colella, Nicola Zerbinati, Giovanni Salti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2017;volume=10;issue=4;spage=207;epage=214;aulast=Rauso
id doaj-258d5e0c21c841508d0457e334fbcc1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-258d5e0c21c841508d0457e334fbcc1d2020-11-24T22:20:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 0974-20772017-01-0110420721410.4103/JCAS.JCAS_89_17Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with fillerRaffaele RausoGiuseppe ColellaNicola ZerbinatiGiovanni SaltiBackground: Nonsurgical aesthetic treatments are usually preferred by patients because their effects are visible immediately after the treatment and patients can return to their normal activities on the same day. Although many studies have indicated safety and efficacy of filler injection to improve facial appearance, it is not absolutely confirmed for nose reshaping. Objectives: To assess the safety and early satisfaction of 52 consecutive patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty with an injection of a 20-mg/mL smooth, cohesive, and viscous hyaluronic acid (HA) filler. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive healthy patients, dissatisfied with the appearance of their nose, were treated with HA injections between November 2014 and November 2016. Complications and side effects were documented. Aesthetic outcomes were scored subjectively on a scale of 1–4 represented by four emoticons. Results: Among patients, 96.15% affirmed to be “very satisfied” at the end of the procedure (50 patients over 52 treated). No major complications and side effects occurred. Conclusions: Outcomes of this study, with the limitation of a non-comparative open-label study, show that surgical remodeling of the nose, with the use of a 20-mg/mL smooth, cohesive, and viscous HA filler, is a safe and predictable technique, with a high degree of satisfaction for the patients.http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2017;volume=10;issue=4;spage=207;epage=214;aulast=RausoFillerhyaluronic acidnonsurgical rhinoplastynoserhinofillersafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raffaele Rauso
Giuseppe Colella
Nicola Zerbinati
Giovanni Salti
spellingShingle Raffaele Rauso
Giuseppe Colella
Nicola Zerbinati
Giovanni Salti
Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Filler
hyaluronic acid
nonsurgical rhinoplasty
nose
rhinofiller
safety
author_facet Raffaele Rauso
Giuseppe Colella
Nicola Zerbinati
Giovanni Salti
author_sort Raffaele Rauso
title Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
title_short Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
title_full Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
title_fullStr Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
title_full_unstemmed Safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
title_sort safety and early satisfaction assessment of patients seeking nonsurgical rhinoplasty with filler
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
issn 0974-2077
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Nonsurgical aesthetic treatments are usually preferred by patients because their effects are visible immediately after the treatment and patients can return to their normal activities on the same day. Although many studies have indicated safety and efficacy of filler injection to improve facial appearance, it is not absolutely confirmed for nose reshaping. Objectives: To assess the safety and early satisfaction of 52 consecutive patients underwent nonsurgical rhinoplasty with an injection of a 20-mg/mL smooth, cohesive, and viscous hyaluronic acid (HA) filler. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two consecutive healthy patients, dissatisfied with the appearance of their nose, were treated with HA injections between November 2014 and November 2016. Complications and side effects were documented. Aesthetic outcomes were scored subjectively on a scale of 1–4 represented by four emoticons. Results: Among patients, 96.15% affirmed to be “very satisfied” at the end of the procedure (50 patients over 52 treated). No major complications and side effects occurred. Conclusions: Outcomes of this study, with the limitation of a non-comparative open-label study, show that surgical remodeling of the nose, with the use of a 20-mg/mL smooth, cohesive, and viscous HA filler, is a safe and predictable technique, with a high degree of satisfaction for the patients.
topic Filler
hyaluronic acid
nonsurgical rhinoplasty
nose
rhinofiller
safety
url http://www.jcasonline.com/article.asp?issn=0974-2077;year=2017;volume=10;issue=4;spage=207;epage=214;aulast=Rauso
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaelerauso safetyandearlysatisfactionassessmentofpatientsseekingnonsurgicalrhinoplastywithfiller
AT giuseppecolella safetyandearlysatisfactionassessmentofpatientsseekingnonsurgicalrhinoplastywithfiller
AT nicolazerbinati safetyandearlysatisfactionassessmentofpatientsseekingnonsurgicalrhinoplastywithfiller
AT giovannisalti safetyandearlysatisfactionassessmentofpatientsseekingnonsurgicalrhinoplastywithfiller
_version_ 1725773209793462272