Grasha-richmann college students’ learning styles of classroom participation: Role of gender and major

• Main Authors: ALI REZA BANESHI, MAHNAZ DEHGHAN TEZERJANI, HASAN MOKHTARPOUR
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014-07-01
• Series: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
• Subjects: Learning; Participation
• Online Access: http://jamp.sums.ac.ir/index.php/JAMP/article/view/112

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the male and female students’ learning styles of classroom participation and these styles’ differences between Humanities and Science majors. Methods: 1039 individuals were selected through the proportional stratified random sampling method among undergraduate and graduate students in Humanities (n=421) and Science (n=618) faculties of Tehran University. In the Humanities group, there were 285 females and 136 males, and in the Science group, there were 208 females and 410 males. The participants answered the Grasha-Riechmann student learning styles scale. Results: The findings indicated that the females obtained significantly higher means in collaborative, participative, and dependent styles than males, but in avoidant, and independent styles, the means for males were higher than those for females. Also, the science group’s means in collaborative, participative, dependent, and competitive styles were significantly higher than those for the humanities group. Conclusion: According to the findings, it seems that due to psychological characteristics, female students tend to collaborate with other students of the same sex and participate in their activities. In this way, they also are more dependent on their teacher and classroom, because otherwise they will face some problems such as anxiety. In addition, it seems that science students in comparison to humanities students are more participative and collaborative because they need more collaboration in their projects and course work.