Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies

Predicting how species interactions evolve requires that we understand the mechanistic basis of coevolution, and thus the functional genotype-by-genotype interactions (G × G) that drive reciprocal natural selection. Theory on host-parasite coevolution provides testable hypotheses for empiricists, bu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katy Denise Heath, Scott eNuismer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2014.00077/full
id doaj-2579d2ae4b5f4699860d0715ae5b9d33
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2579d2ae4b5f4699860d0715ae5b9d332020-11-25T00:17:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212014-04-01510.3389/fgene.2014.0007781816Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studiesKaty Denise Heath0Scott eNuismer1University of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignUniversity of IdahoPredicting how species interactions evolve requires that we understand the mechanistic basis of coevolution, and thus the functional genotype-by-genotype interactions (G × G) that drive reciprocal natural selection. Theory on host-parasite coevolution provides testable hypotheses for empiricists, but depends upon models of functional G × G that remain loosely tethered to the molecular details of any particular system. In practice, reciprocal cross-infection studies are often used to partition the variation in infection or fitness in a population that is attributable to G × G (statistical G × G). Here we use simulations to demonstrate that within-population statistical G × G likely tells us little about the existence of coevolution, its strength, or the genetic basis of functional G × G. Combined with studies of multiple populations or points in time, mapping and molecular techniques can bridge the gap between natural variation and mechanistic models of coevolution, while model-based statistics can formally confront coevolutionary models with cross-infection data. Together these approaches provide a robust framework for inferring the infection genetics underlying statistical G × G, helping unravel the genetic basis of coevolution.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2014.00077/fullSymbiosispathogenEpistasisCoevolutionintergenomic epistasis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katy Denise Heath
Scott eNuismer
spellingShingle Katy Denise Heath
Scott eNuismer
Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
Frontiers in Genetics
Symbiosis
pathogen
Epistasis
Coevolution
intergenomic epistasis
author_facet Katy Denise Heath
Scott eNuismer
author_sort Katy Denise Heath
title Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
title_short Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
title_full Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
title_fullStr Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
title_full_unstemmed Connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
title_sort connecting functional and statistical definitions of genotype by genotype interactions in coevolutionary studies
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Genetics
issn 1664-8021
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Predicting how species interactions evolve requires that we understand the mechanistic basis of coevolution, and thus the functional genotype-by-genotype interactions (G × G) that drive reciprocal natural selection. Theory on host-parasite coevolution provides testable hypotheses for empiricists, but depends upon models of functional G × G that remain loosely tethered to the molecular details of any particular system. In practice, reciprocal cross-infection studies are often used to partition the variation in infection or fitness in a population that is attributable to G × G (statistical G × G). Here we use simulations to demonstrate that within-population statistical G × G likely tells us little about the existence of coevolution, its strength, or the genetic basis of functional G × G. Combined with studies of multiple populations or points in time, mapping and molecular techniques can bridge the gap between natural variation and mechanistic models of coevolution, while model-based statistics can formally confront coevolutionary models with cross-infection data. Together these approaches provide a robust framework for inferring the infection genetics underlying statistical G × G, helping unravel the genetic basis of coevolution.
topic Symbiosis
pathogen
Epistasis
Coevolution
intergenomic epistasis
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2014.00077/full
work_keys_str_mv AT katydeniseheath connectingfunctionalandstatisticaldefinitionsofgenotypebygenotypeinteractionsincoevolutionarystudies
AT scottenuismer connectingfunctionalandstatisticaldefinitionsofgenotypebygenotypeinteractionsincoevolutionarystudies
_version_ 1725378471160446976