EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES

Optical and SAR data are efficient data sources for shoreline monitoring. The processing of SAR data such as feature extraction is not an easy task since the images have totally different structure than optical imagery. Determination of threshold value is a challenging task for SAR data. In this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Bayram, N. Demir, B. Akpinar, S. Oy, F. Erdem, T. Vögtle, D. Z. Seker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-09-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-1/39/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018.pdf
id doaj-256a596a284b4e84a483d4b37f941911
record_format Article
spelling doaj-256a596a284b4e84a483d4b37f9419112020-11-25T00:45:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342018-09-01XLII-1394310.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGESB. Bayram0N. Demir1B. Akpinar2S. Oy3F. Erdem4T. Vögtle5D. Z. Seker6Yildiz Technical University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, 34220 Esenler Istanbul, TurkeyAkdeniz University, Space Science and Technologies, 07058 Antalya, TurkeyYildiz Technical University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, 34220 Esenler Istanbul, TurkeyAkdeniz University, Space Science and Technologies, 07058 Antalya, TurkeyYildiz Technical University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, 34220 Esenler Istanbul, TurkeyKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, D-76128 Karlsruhe, GermanyIstanbul Technical University, Department of Geomatics Engineering, 80626 Maslak Istanbul, TurkeyOptical and SAR data are efficient data sources for shoreline monitoring. The processing of SAR data such as feature extraction is not an easy task since the images have totally different structure than optical imagery. Determination of threshold value is a challenging task for SAR data. In this study, SENTINEL-2A optical data was used as ancillary data to predict fuzzy membership parameters for segmentation of SENTINEL-1A SAR data to extract shoreline. SENTINEL-2A and SENTINEL-1A satellite images used were taken in September 9, 2016 and September 13, 2016 respectively. Three different segmentation algorithms which are selected from object, learning and pixel-based methods. They have been exploited to obtain land and water classes which have been used as an input data for parameter estimation. Thus, the performance of different segmentation algorithm has been investigated and analysed. In the first step of the study, Mean-Shift, Random Forest and Whale Optimization algorithms have been employed to obtain water and land classes from the SENTINEL-2A image. Water and land classes derived from each algorithm – are used as input data, and then the required parameters for the fuzzy clustering of SENTINEL-1A SAR image, were calculated. Lake Constance, Germany has been chosen as the study area. In this study, additionally an interface plugin has been developed and integrated into the open source Quantum GIS software platform. The developed interface allows non-experts to process and extract the shorelines without using any parameters. But, this system requires pre-segmented data as input. Thus, the batch process calculates the required parameters.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-1/39/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Bayram
N. Demir
B. Akpinar
S. Oy
F. Erdem
T. Vögtle
D. Z. Seker
spellingShingle B. Bayram
N. Demir
B. Akpinar
S. Oy
F. Erdem
T. Vögtle
D. Z. Seker
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
author_facet B. Bayram
N. Demir
B. Akpinar
S. Oy
F. Erdem
T. Vögtle
D. Z. Seker
author_sort B. Bayram
title EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
title_short EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
title_full EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
title_fullStr EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
title_sort effect of different segmentation methods using optical satellite imagery to estimate fuzzy clustering parameters for sentinel-1a sar images
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Optical and SAR data are efficient data sources for shoreline monitoring. The processing of SAR data such as feature extraction is not an easy task since the images have totally different structure than optical imagery. Determination of threshold value is a challenging task for SAR data. In this study, SENTINEL-2A optical data was used as ancillary data to predict fuzzy membership parameters for segmentation of SENTINEL-1A SAR data to extract shoreline. SENTINEL-2A and SENTINEL-1A satellite images used were taken in September 9, 2016 and September 13, 2016 respectively. Three different segmentation algorithms which are selected from object, learning and pixel-based methods. They have been exploited to obtain land and water classes which have been used as an input data for parameter estimation. Thus, the performance of different segmentation algorithm has been investigated and analysed. In the first step of the study, Mean-Shift, Random Forest and Whale Optimization algorithms have been employed to obtain water and land classes from the SENTINEL-2A image. Water and land classes derived from each algorithm – are used as input data, and then the required parameters for the fuzzy clustering of SENTINEL-1A SAR image, were calculated. Lake Constance, Germany has been chosen as the study area. In this study, additionally an interface plugin has been developed and integrated into the open source Quantum GIS software platform. The developed interface allows non-experts to process and extract the shorelines without using any parameters. But, this system requires pre-segmented data as input. Thus, the batch process calculates the required parameters.
url https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-1/39/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bbayram effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT ndemir effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT bakpinar effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT soy effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT ferdem effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT tvogtle effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
AT dzseker effectofdifferentsegmentationmethodsusingopticalsatelliteimagerytoestimatefuzzyclusteringparametersforsentinel1asarimages
_version_ 1725269104260022272