Cost Analysis of Commonly used Combination of Drugs in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Background: Glaucoma is second cause of blindness in the world. The financial burden on the patient during long-term treatment is immense and affects the compliance to medications, thus visual morbidity. Objective: To analyse economic impact of three commonly used drug combinations (Dorzolamide...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/5966/12491_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(AGAK).pdf |
Summary: | Background: Glaucoma is second cause of blindness in the
world. The financial burden on the patient during long-term
treatment is immense and affects the compliance to medications,
thus visual morbidity.
Objective: To analyse economic impact of three commonly used drug
combinations (Dorzolamide+Timolol=DT; Brimonidine+Timolol=
BT; Latanoprost+Timolol=LT) in primary open angle glaucoma.
Materials and Methods: This observational, prospective study
was undertaken at M & J Institute of Ophthalmology, Civil Hospital,
Ahmedabad, a western regional institute of Ophthalmology. A
total of 257 patients were included in the study. Only101 patients
could complete the 6 month follow-up, of which 35, 34 and 32
patients belonged to DT, BT and LT group respectively. Cost of
drug, details of the transportation were noted at every visit. Total
cost incurred per patient/eye was calculated. Cost effectiveness
was calculated by cost per mm Hg IOP (Intra-Ocular Pressure)
reduction.
Results: Treatment with DT, BT & LT group consumed 8.6%, 4.6%
and 7.7% of the per annum income of the family, respectively.
Cost of medications per annum (in INR)/eye for DT, BT & LT group
were 2562 ± 15.74, 1544 ± 32.06, 3876 ± 73.68 (Mean±SEM)
respectively. Additional cost of travelling was different for patients
coming from Ahmedabad (Locals) and outsiders (patients coming
outside Ahmedabad, India). Outsiders has to bear the brunt of
higher transport charges, where they spent an average of Rs. 914,
856 & 933 per annum (5 follow-ups), whereas, Locals spent an
average of Rs. 104, 112, 100 for DT, BT & LT group respectively.
Conclusion: Treatment with BT was found to be most costeffective among three groups. Drug therapy takes substantial
amount from per annum income of family and was an important
compliance factor in the treatment of POAG. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |