Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper

Introduction: This paper presents a historical review of quality assurance in nursing with terminologicaldefinitions. General issues involving the evaluation of quality of care are discussed and key questions tackled.Aims: The aims of this paper were to critically discuss and analyze the essence of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antigoni Fountouki, Dimitrios Theofanidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Professor Despina Sapountzi-Krepia 2010-01-01
Series:International Journal of Caring Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/Vol3_Issue2_02_Theofanidis.pdf
id doaj-25557c526e9a4c229f6091e7e8edb740
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25557c526e9a4c229f6091e7e8edb7402020-11-24T23:57:22ZengProfessor Despina Sapountzi-KrepiaInternational Journal of Caring Sciences1791-52011792-037X2010-01-01325662Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position PaperAntigoni FountoukiDimitrios TheofanidisIntroduction: This paper presents a historical review of quality assurance in nursing with terminologicaldefinitions. General issues involving the evaluation of quality of care are discussed and key questions tackled.Aims: The aims of this paper were to critically discuss and analyze the essence of quality as a construct with highrelevance to nursing practice. Also, to look at quality through a series of important benchmark questions such aswho evaluates, who is the evaluated, what is evaluated, whose interests are involved.Methods: An online search in Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, ELIN, Embase, and the Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews was conducted. Retrieved studies were screened to meet certain inclusion criteria, i.e.relevance, significant meanings in correspondence with this paper’s aims and of interest to an international nursingreadership.Results: Data were abstracted from each paper and tabulated for further discussion and data synthesis. Nurses havebeen fervent supporters of quality assurance as it provides feedback to the profession about its practices andeffectiveness of care. The hospital, as an independent organization in the health care industry, sees nursing as theprovider closest to the consumer so is very concerned with the quality of nursing care. Nurses see through the lensof the customer and understand his or her wants and needs and therefore understand business better than otherproviders.Conclusions: The main conclusion of this position paper is that a major underlying reason for quality of careevaluation is the measurement of costs. As the goal for every successful manager is to minimise costs whilemaintaining quality. This equates nursing evaluation to the evaluation of a business model- a parallel which doesnot appeal to the caring profession of nursing.http://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/Vol3_Issue2_02_Theofanidis.pdfqualityassuranceevaluationnursing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antigoni Fountouki
Dimitrios Theofanidis
spellingShingle Antigoni Fountouki
Dimitrios Theofanidis
Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
International Journal of Caring Sciences
quality
assurance
evaluation
nursing
author_facet Antigoni Fountouki
Dimitrios Theofanidis
author_sort Antigoni Fountouki
title Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
title_short Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
title_full Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
title_fullStr Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
title_full_unstemmed Quality Of Life and Nursing: a Position Paper
title_sort quality of life and nursing: a position paper
publisher Professor Despina Sapountzi-Krepia
series International Journal of Caring Sciences
issn 1791-5201
1792-037X
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Introduction: This paper presents a historical review of quality assurance in nursing with terminologicaldefinitions. General issues involving the evaluation of quality of care are discussed and key questions tackled.Aims: The aims of this paper were to critically discuss and analyze the essence of quality as a construct with highrelevance to nursing practice. Also, to look at quality through a series of important benchmark questions such aswho evaluates, who is the evaluated, what is evaluated, whose interests are involved.Methods: An online search in Medline, CINHAL, PsycINFO, ELIN, Embase, and the Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews was conducted. Retrieved studies were screened to meet certain inclusion criteria, i.e.relevance, significant meanings in correspondence with this paper’s aims and of interest to an international nursingreadership.Results: Data were abstracted from each paper and tabulated for further discussion and data synthesis. Nurses havebeen fervent supporters of quality assurance as it provides feedback to the profession about its practices andeffectiveness of care. The hospital, as an independent organization in the health care industry, sees nursing as theprovider closest to the consumer so is very concerned with the quality of nursing care. Nurses see through the lensof the customer and understand his or her wants and needs and therefore understand business better than otherproviders.Conclusions: The main conclusion of this position paper is that a major underlying reason for quality of careevaluation is the measurement of costs. As the goal for every successful manager is to minimise costs whilemaintaining quality. This equates nursing evaluation to the evaluation of a business model- a parallel which doesnot appeal to the caring profession of nursing.
topic quality
assurance
evaluation
nursing
url http://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/Vol3_Issue2_02_Theofanidis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT antigonifountouki qualityoflifeandnursingapositionpaper
AT dimitriostheofanidis qualityoflifeandnursingapositionpaper
_version_ 1725454282684104704