Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations

Agency-structure debate has become one of the central issues in modern organizational sociology and the most problematic theoretical area in institutional analysis. Since then researchers in new institutional sociology have focused on bringing agency and interests back in the theory that views ratio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herman Aksom, Anton Chornyi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PC Technology Center 2018-01-01
Series:Tehnologìčnij Audit ta Rezervi Virobnictva
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/134902
id doaj-254d9cfb2e3a44f19d0160496a5fb4a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-254d9cfb2e3a44f19d0160496a5fb4a82020-11-25T02:14:13ZengPC Technology CenterTehnologìčnij Audit ta Rezervi Virobnictva2226-37802312-83722018-01-0135(41)434810.15587/2312-8372.2018.134902134902Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizationsHerman Aksom0Anton Chornyi1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601Agency-structure debate has become one of the central issues in modern organizational sociology and the most problematic theoretical area in institutional analysis. Since then researchers in new institutional sociology have focused on bringing agency and interests back in the theory that views rationality and motives as historically and culturally embedded and constructed by their institutional environments. To date, the most prospective theory is fashion perspective that sees interests and beliefs to be socially constructed and shaped by institutional forces. Accordingly, diffusion and adoption of administrative innovations is nothing but a result of these beliefs generated by institutional effects. Therefore the object of research is the essentiality of fashion management theory taking into account its ontological and epistemological characteristics. One of the most problematic areas is understanding the way institutions and fashions can be conceptualized upon the same mechanisms of emergence, reproduction and development. This paper attempts to clarify and resolve these two streams of literature by attending social construction perspective and revisiting its central tenets. Specifically, the present study put forward arguments that it is not homogeneity or symbolic pragmatic conformity should be the main units of analysis but the meanings that individuals attach to technical structures and elements; not the trajectories and waves of popularity of ideas and structures but the way subjective judgments and interpretations acquire objective status and eclipse former technical foundations. Based on logical generalization and morphological analysis, it is offered to reduce the conceptualization of institutions and organizations back from agency-centered depiction and strategic-perspective towards over-socialized picture with adequately addresses the prevalence of macro-level forces over micro-level individuals. It is concluded that neither former institutional theory nor its modern alternatives should focus exclusively on the trajectory and logic of diffusion of institutional templates.http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/134902management fashion theorysocial constructioninstitutional sociologyinstitutional statements
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Herman Aksom
Anton Chornyi
spellingShingle Herman Aksom
Anton Chornyi
Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
Tehnologìčnij Audit ta Rezervi Virobnictva
management fashion theory
social construction
institutional sociology
institutional statements
author_facet Herman Aksom
Anton Chornyi
author_sort Herman Aksom
title Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
title_short Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
title_full Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
title_fullStr Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
title_full_unstemmed Resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
title_sort resolving epistemological issues in theoretical and methodological apparatus of institutional theories of organizations
publisher PC Technology Center
series Tehnologìčnij Audit ta Rezervi Virobnictva
issn 2226-3780
2312-8372
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Agency-structure debate has become one of the central issues in modern organizational sociology and the most problematic theoretical area in institutional analysis. Since then researchers in new institutional sociology have focused on bringing agency and interests back in the theory that views rationality and motives as historically and culturally embedded and constructed by their institutional environments. To date, the most prospective theory is fashion perspective that sees interests and beliefs to be socially constructed and shaped by institutional forces. Accordingly, diffusion and adoption of administrative innovations is nothing but a result of these beliefs generated by institutional effects. Therefore the object of research is the essentiality of fashion management theory taking into account its ontological and epistemological characteristics. One of the most problematic areas is understanding the way institutions and fashions can be conceptualized upon the same mechanisms of emergence, reproduction and development. This paper attempts to clarify and resolve these two streams of literature by attending social construction perspective and revisiting its central tenets. Specifically, the present study put forward arguments that it is not homogeneity or symbolic pragmatic conformity should be the main units of analysis but the meanings that individuals attach to technical structures and elements; not the trajectories and waves of popularity of ideas and structures but the way subjective judgments and interpretations acquire objective status and eclipse former technical foundations. Based on logical generalization and morphological analysis, it is offered to reduce the conceptualization of institutions and organizations back from agency-centered depiction and strategic-perspective towards over-socialized picture with adequately addresses the prevalence of macro-level forces over micro-level individuals. It is concluded that neither former institutional theory nor its modern alternatives should focus exclusively on the trajectory and logic of diffusion of institutional templates.
topic management fashion theory
social construction
institutional sociology
institutional statements
url http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/134902
work_keys_str_mv AT hermanaksom resolvingepistemologicalissuesintheoreticalandmethodologicalapparatusofinstitutionaltheoriesoforganizations
AT antonchornyi resolvingepistemologicalissuesintheoreticalandmethodologicalapparatusofinstitutionaltheoriesoforganizations
_version_ 1724901066117480448