Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
Human infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds wo...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The MIT Press
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Open Mind |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024 |
id |
doaj-25443e3ea9e94d9aadcbcec7c22585de |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-25443e3ea9e94d9aadcbcec7c22585de2020-11-24T21:49:08ZengThe MIT PressOpen Mind2470-29862019-05-013314010.1162/opmi_a_00024opmi_a_00024Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of GivingDenis Tatone0Mikołaj Hernik1Gergely Csibra2Cognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityHuman infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds would interpret the displacement of an object as an agent’s goal even if it could be dismissed as a side effect of a different goal. Across two looking-time experiments, we showed that, when the displacement only resulted in a change of object location, infants expected the agent to pursue the other goal. However, when the same change of location resulted in a transfer of object possession, infants reliably adopted this outcome as the agent’s goal. The interpretive shift that the mere presence of a potential recipient caused is testament to the infants’ susceptibility to cues of benefit delivery: an action efficiently causing a transfer of object possession appeared sufficient to induce the interpretation of goal-directed giving even if the transfer was carried out without any interaction between Giver and Givee and was embedded in an event affording an alternative goal interpretation.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024action understandinggiving action schemainfantsgoal ascription |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Denis Tatone Mikołaj Hernik Gergely Csibra |
spellingShingle |
Denis Tatone Mikołaj Hernik Gergely Csibra Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving Open Mind action understanding giving action schema infants goal ascription |
author_facet |
Denis Tatone Mikołaj Hernik Gergely Csibra |
author_sort |
Denis Tatone |
title |
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving |
title_short |
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving |
title_full |
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving |
title_fullStr |
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving |
title_sort |
minimal cues of possession transfer compel infants to ascribe the goal of giving |
publisher |
The MIT Press |
series |
Open Mind |
issn |
2470-2986 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Human infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds would interpret the displacement of an object as an agent’s goal even if it could be dismissed as a side effect of a different goal. Across two looking-time experiments, we showed that, when the displacement only resulted in a change of object location, infants expected the agent to pursue the other goal. However, when the same change of location resulted in a transfer of object possession, infants reliably adopted this outcome as the agent’s goal. The interpretive shift that the mere presence of a potential recipient caused is testament to the infants’ susceptibility to cues of benefit delivery: an action efficiently causing a transfer of object possession appeared sufficient to induce the interpretation of goal-directed giving even if the transfer was carried out without any interaction between Giver and Givee and was embedded in an event affording an alternative goal interpretation. |
topic |
action understanding giving action schema infants goal ascription |
url |
https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT denistatone minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving AT mikołajhernik minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving AT gergelycsibra minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving |
_version_ |
1725889370924253184 |