Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving

Human infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denis Tatone, Mikołaj Hernik, Gergely Csibra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2019-05-01
Series:Open Mind
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024
id doaj-25443e3ea9e94d9aadcbcec7c22585de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-25443e3ea9e94d9aadcbcec7c22585de2020-11-24T21:49:08ZengThe MIT PressOpen Mind2470-29862019-05-013314010.1162/opmi_a_00024opmi_a_00024Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of GivingDenis Tatone0Mikołaj Hernik1Gergely Csibra2Cognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityCognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European UniversityHuman infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds would interpret the displacement of an object as an agent’s goal even if it could be dismissed as a side effect of a different goal. Across two looking-time experiments, we showed that, when the displacement only resulted in a change of object location, infants expected the agent to pursue the other goal. However, when the same change of location resulted in a transfer of object possession, infants reliably adopted this outcome as the agent’s goal. The interpretive shift that the mere presence of a potential recipient caused is testament to the infants’ susceptibility to cues of benefit delivery: an action efficiently causing a transfer of object possession appeared sufficient to induce the interpretation of goal-directed giving even if the transfer was carried out without any interaction between Giver and Givee and was embedded in an event affording an alternative goal interpretation.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024action understandinggiving action schemainfantsgoal ascription
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denis Tatone
Mikołaj Hernik
Gergely Csibra
spellingShingle Denis Tatone
Mikołaj Hernik
Gergely Csibra
Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
Open Mind
action understanding
giving action schema
infants
goal ascription
author_facet Denis Tatone
Mikołaj Hernik
Gergely Csibra
author_sort Denis Tatone
title Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
title_short Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
title_full Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
title_fullStr Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
title_full_unstemmed Minimal Cues of Possession Transfer Compel Infants to Ascribe the Goal of Giving
title_sort minimal cues of possession transfer compel infants to ascribe the goal of giving
publisher The MIT Press
series Open Mind
issn 2470-2986
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Human infants’ readiness to interpret impoverished object-transfer events as acts of giving suggests the existence of a dedicated action schema for identifying interactions based on active object transfer. Here we investigated the sensitivity of this giving schema by testing whether 15-month-olds would interpret the displacement of an object as an agent’s goal even if it could be dismissed as a side effect of a different goal. Across two looking-time experiments, we showed that, when the displacement only resulted in a change of object location, infants expected the agent to pursue the other goal. However, when the same change of location resulted in a transfer of object possession, infants reliably adopted this outcome as the agent’s goal. The interpretive shift that the mere presence of a potential recipient caused is testament to the infants’ susceptibility to cues of benefit delivery: an action efficiently causing a transfer of object possession appeared sufficient to induce the interpretation of goal-directed giving even if the transfer was carried out without any interaction between Giver and Givee and was embedded in an event affording an alternative goal interpretation.
topic action understanding
giving action schema
infants
goal ascription
url https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00024
work_keys_str_mv AT denistatone minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving
AT mikołajhernik minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving
AT gergelycsibra minimalcuesofpossessiontransfercompelinfantstoascribethegoalofgiving
_version_ 1725889370924253184