Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test (QFT-GIT) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) are used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, conclusive evidence regarding the agreement of these two tests among high risk contacts is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erfan Ayubi, Amin Doosti-Irani, Ehsan Mostafavi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Epidemiology 2015-10-01
Series:Epidemiology and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-epih.org/upload/pdf/epih-37-e2015043.pdf
id doaj-253628f5796b4333b3a4c1b0f2e54186
record_format Article
spelling doaj-253628f5796b4333b3a4c1b0f2e541862020-11-24T21:56:40ZengKorean Society of Epidemiology Epidemiology and Health2092-71932015-10-013710.4178/epih/e2015043809Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysisErfan Ayubi0Amin Doosti-Irani1Ehsan Mostafavi2 Department of Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran Department of Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran Department of Epidemiology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, IranOBJECTIVES: The QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test (QFT-GIT) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) are used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, conclusive evidence regarding the agreement of these two tests among high risk contacts is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the agreement between the TST and the QFT-GIT using kappa statistics. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid were searched using a targeted search strategy to identify relevant studies published as of June 2015. Two researchers reviewed the eligibility of studies and extracted data from them. The pooled kappa estimate was determined using a random effect model. Subgroup analysis, Egger’s test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 6,744 articles were retrieved in the initial search, of which 24 studies had data suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled kappa coefficient and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa were 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.45) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.49), respectively. The results of the subgroup analysis found that age group, quality of the study, location, and the TST cutoff point affected heterogeneity for the kappa estimate. No publication bias was found (Begg’s test, p=0.53; Egger’s test, p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between the QFT-GIT and the TST in diagnosing LTBI among high-risk contacts was found to range from fair to moderate.http://www.e-epih.org/upload/pdf/epih-37-e2015043.pdfKappaMeta-analysisLatent tuberculosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erfan Ayubi
Amin Doosti-Irani
Ehsan Mostafavi
spellingShingle Erfan Ayubi
Amin Doosti-Irani
Ehsan Mostafavi
Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Epidemiology and Health
Kappa
Meta-analysis
Latent tuberculosis
author_facet Erfan Ayubi
Amin Doosti-Irani
Ehsan Mostafavi
author_sort Erfan Ayubi
title Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort do the tuberculin skin test and the quantiferon-tb gold in-tube test agree in detecting latent tuberculosis among high-risk contacts? a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Korean Society of Epidemiology
series Epidemiology and Health
issn 2092-7193
publishDate 2015-10-01
description OBJECTIVES: The QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube test (QFT-GIT) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) are used to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, conclusive evidence regarding the agreement of these two tests among high risk contacts is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the agreement between the TST and the QFT-GIT using kappa statistics. METHODS: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid were searched using a targeted search strategy to identify relevant studies published as of June 2015. Two researchers reviewed the eligibility of studies and extracted data from them. The pooled kappa estimate was determined using a random effect model. Subgroup analysis, Egger’s test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 6,744 articles were retrieved in the initial search, of which 24 studies had data suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled kappa coefficient and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa were 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.45) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.49), respectively. The results of the subgroup analysis found that age group, quality of the study, location, and the TST cutoff point affected heterogeneity for the kappa estimate. No publication bias was found (Begg’s test, p=0.53; Egger’s test, p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between the QFT-GIT and the TST in diagnosing LTBI among high-risk contacts was found to range from fair to moderate.
topic Kappa
Meta-analysis
Latent tuberculosis
url http://www.e-epih.org/upload/pdf/epih-37-e2015043.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT erfanayubi dothetuberculinskintestandthequantiferontbgoldintubetestagreeindetectinglatenttuberculosisamonghighriskcontactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amindoostiirani dothetuberculinskintestandthequantiferontbgoldintubetestagreeindetectinglatenttuberculosisamonghighriskcontactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ehsanmostafavi dothetuberculinskintestandthequantiferontbgoldintubetestagreeindetectinglatenttuberculosisamonghighriskcontactsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725857878837821440