Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Little evidence is available to determine which patients should undergo repeat biopsy after initial benign extended core biopsy (ECB). Attempts have been made to reduce the frequency of negative repeat biopsies using PSA kinetics, de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthews Fiona, Pashayan Nora, Rochester Mark A, Doble Andrew, McLoughlin John
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-07-01
Series:BMC Urology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/9/7
id doaj-250a71ab26b14179992edfa083700103
record_format Article
spelling doaj-250a71ab26b14179992edfa0837001032020-11-25T01:37:17ZengBMCBMC Urology1471-24902009-07-0191710.1186/1471-2490-9-7Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK populationMatthews FionaPashayan NoraRochester Mark ADoble AndrewMcLoughlin John<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Little evidence is available to determine which patients should undergo repeat biopsy after initial benign extended core biopsy (ECB). Attempts have been made to reduce the frequency of negative repeat biopsies using PSA kinetics, density, free-to-total ratios and Kattan's nomogram, to identify men more likely to harbour cancer but no single tool accurately predicts biopsy outcome. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive nomogram to identify men more likely to have a cancer diagnosed on repeat prostate biopsy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with previous benign ECB undergoing repeat biopsy were identified from a database. Association between age, volume, stage, previous histology, PSA kinetics and positive repeat biopsy was analysed. Variables were entered stepwise into logistic regression models. A risk score giving the probability of positive repeat biopsy was estimated. The performance of this score was assessed using receiver characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>110 repeat biopsies were performed in this period. Cancer was detected in 31% of repeat biopsies at Hospital (1) and 30% at Hospital (2). The most accurate predictive model combined age, PSA, PSA velocity, free-to-total PSA ratio, prostate volume and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. The risk model performed well in an independent sample, area under the curve (AUC<sub>ROC</sub>) was 0.818 (95% CI 0.707 to 0.929) for the risk model and 0.696 (95% CI 0.472 to 0.921) for the validation model. It was calculated that using a threshold risk score of > 0.2 to identify high risk individuals would reduce repeat biopsies by 39% while identifying 90% of the men with prostate cancer.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An accurate multi-variable predictive tool to determine the risk of positive repeat prostate biopsy is presented. This can be used by urologists in an outpatient setting to aid decision-making for men with prior benign histology for whom a repeat biopsy is being considered.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/9/7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthews Fiona
Pashayan Nora
Rochester Mark A
Doble Andrew
McLoughlin John
spellingShingle Matthews Fiona
Pashayan Nora
Rochester Mark A
Doble Andrew
McLoughlin John
Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
BMC Urology
author_facet Matthews Fiona
Pashayan Nora
Rochester Mark A
Doble Andrew
McLoughlin John
author_sort Matthews Fiona
title Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
title_short Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
title_full Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
title_fullStr Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population
title_sort development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a uk population
publisher BMC
series BMC Urology
issn 1471-2490
publishDate 2009-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Little evidence is available to determine which patients should undergo repeat biopsy after initial benign extended core biopsy (ECB). Attempts have been made to reduce the frequency of negative repeat biopsies using PSA kinetics, density, free-to-total ratios and Kattan's nomogram, to identify men more likely to harbour cancer but no single tool accurately predicts biopsy outcome. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive nomogram to identify men more likely to have a cancer diagnosed on repeat prostate biopsy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with previous benign ECB undergoing repeat biopsy were identified from a database. Association between age, volume, stage, previous histology, PSA kinetics and positive repeat biopsy was analysed. Variables were entered stepwise into logistic regression models. A risk score giving the probability of positive repeat biopsy was estimated. The performance of this score was assessed using receiver characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>110 repeat biopsies were performed in this period. Cancer was detected in 31% of repeat biopsies at Hospital (1) and 30% at Hospital (2). The most accurate predictive model combined age, PSA, PSA velocity, free-to-total PSA ratio, prostate volume and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. The risk model performed well in an independent sample, area under the curve (AUC<sub>ROC</sub>) was 0.818 (95% CI 0.707 to 0.929) for the risk model and 0.696 (95% CI 0.472 to 0.921) for the validation model. It was calculated that using a threshold risk score of > 0.2 to identify high risk individuals would reduce repeat biopsies by 39% while identifying 90% of the men with prostate cancer.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>An accurate multi-variable predictive tool to determine the risk of positive repeat prostate biopsy is presented. This can be used by urologists in an outpatient setting to aid decision-making for men with prior benign histology for whom a repeat biopsy is being considered.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/9/7
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsfiona developmentandvalidationofriskscoreforpredictingpositiverepeatprostatebiopsyinpatientswithapreviousnegativebiopsyinaukpopulation
AT pashayannora developmentandvalidationofriskscoreforpredictingpositiverepeatprostatebiopsyinpatientswithapreviousnegativebiopsyinaukpopulation
AT rochestermarka developmentandvalidationofriskscoreforpredictingpositiverepeatprostatebiopsyinpatientswithapreviousnegativebiopsyinaukpopulation
AT dobleandrew developmentandvalidationofriskscoreforpredictingpositiverepeatprostatebiopsyinpatientswithapreviousnegativebiopsyinaukpopulation
AT mcloughlinjohn developmentandvalidationofriskscoreforpredictingpositiverepeatprostatebiopsyinpatientswithapreviousnegativebiopsyinaukpopulation
_version_ 1725058575542255616