Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality

The article proposes a comparative analysis of three different contexts and management of hospitality for asylum seekers on the Italian-Slovenian border since the reopening in 2015 of the so-called “Balkan route” as an overland door to Europe. Through interviews and participant observation, we highl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberta Altin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Cagliari 2019-12-01
Series:Anuac
Online Access:http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3680
id doaj-2503c1a987744551a9b00a041650e820
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2503c1a987744551a9b00a041650e8202020-11-25T01:41:11ZengUniversità degli Studi di CagliariAnuac2239-625X2019-12-018273510.7340/anuac2239-625X-36802734Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitalityRoberta Altin0Università di TriesteThe article proposes a comparative analysis of three different contexts and management of hospitality for asylum seekers on the Italian-Slovenian border since the reopening in 2015 of the so-called “Balkan route” as an overland door to Europe. Through interviews and participant observation, we highlight the differences among a CARA in Gradisca, confined in a large militarized barrack on the margins of social life, a SPRAR system in the Villaggio del Pescatore, founded by a former WW2 refugee’s community, and the efficient model of widespread hospitality in Trieste that distributes migrants in apartments with coordinated self-management. However, the scenario of Trieste also includes an illegal settlement in another historical place of previous forced migrations, where migrants try to escape the dichotomous logic of assistance vs. rejection in order to strategically position themselves in a gray area within the liminal space between the authoritarian and humanitarian regime. The interpretation of micro-contexts clearly highlights the outcome of divergent choices, both in terms of the organization and management of hospitality (large militarized and confined center vs. widespread hospitality and SPRAR), and in terms of the different media and political representations, with an impact on the daily lives of migrants, citizens and workers involved.http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3680
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roberta Altin
spellingShingle Roberta Altin
Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
Anuac
author_facet Roberta Altin
author_sort Roberta Altin
title Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
title_short Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
title_full Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
title_fullStr Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
title_full_unstemmed Standing at the edge: Asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
title_sort standing at the edge: asylum seekers between confinement and spread hospitality
publisher Università degli Studi di Cagliari
series Anuac
issn 2239-625X
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article proposes a comparative analysis of three different contexts and management of hospitality for asylum seekers on the Italian-Slovenian border since the reopening in 2015 of the so-called “Balkan route” as an overland door to Europe. Through interviews and participant observation, we highlight the differences among a CARA in Gradisca, confined in a large militarized barrack on the margins of social life, a SPRAR system in the Villaggio del Pescatore, founded by a former WW2 refugee’s community, and the efficient model of widespread hospitality in Trieste that distributes migrants in apartments with coordinated self-management. However, the scenario of Trieste also includes an illegal settlement in another historical place of previous forced migrations, where migrants try to escape the dichotomous logic of assistance vs. rejection in order to strategically position themselves in a gray area within the liminal space between the authoritarian and humanitarian regime. The interpretation of micro-contexts clearly highlights the outcome of divergent choices, both in terms of the organization and management of hospitality (large militarized and confined center vs. widespread hospitality and SPRAR), and in terms of the different media and political representations, with an impact on the daily lives of migrants, citizens and workers involved.
url http://ojs.unica.it/index.php/anuac/article/view/3680
work_keys_str_mv AT robertaaltin standingattheedgeasylumseekersbetweenconfinementandspreadhospitality
_version_ 1725042080107986944