Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells

Evolution has generated enormous diversity in animal genitalia. However, the importance of private property in driving penis size evolution has rarely been explored. Here, I introduce a novel hypothesis, the ‘private parts for private property' hypothesis, which posits that enlarged penises evo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark E. Laidre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2019-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181760
id doaj-24f563a2feff4571bbb7f1cc29c14cdb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24f563a2feff4571bbb7f1cc29c14cdb2020-11-25T04:05:29ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032019-01-016110.1098/rsos.181760181760Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shellsMark E. LaidreEvolution has generated enormous diversity in animal genitalia. However, the importance of private property in driving penis size evolution has rarely been explored. Here, I introduce a novel hypothesis, the ‘private parts for private property' hypothesis, which posits that enlarged penises evolved to prevent the theft of property during sex. I tested this hypothesis in hermit crabs, which carry valuable portable property (a shell) and which must emerge from this shell during sex, risking social theft of their property by eavesdroppers. I measured relative penis size (penis-to-body ratio) for N = 328 specimens spanning nine closely related species. Species carrying more valuable, more easily stolen property had significantly larger penis size than species carrying less valuable, less easily stolen property, which, in turn, had larger penis size than species carrying no property at all. These patterns in penis size remained even when phylogeny was controlled for, and the patterns were not explained by alternative hypotheses. Instead, the results suggest larger penises evolved as morphological adaptations to facilitate safe sex, in which individuals retain their valuable property by extending a long penis outside the shell to copulate. This hypothesis may likewise apply to other taxa, including those with valuable but non-portable property.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181760comparative analysesconflict and cooperationprivate propertypenis sizeshellssocial evolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark E. Laidre
spellingShingle Mark E. Laidre
Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
Royal Society Open Science
comparative analyses
conflict and cooperation
private property
penis size
shells
social evolution
author_facet Mark E. Laidre
author_sort Mark E. Laidre
title Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
title_short Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
title_full Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
title_fullStr Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
title_full_unstemmed Private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
title_sort private parts for private property: evolution of penis size with more valuable, easily stolen shells
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Evolution has generated enormous diversity in animal genitalia. However, the importance of private property in driving penis size evolution has rarely been explored. Here, I introduce a novel hypothesis, the ‘private parts for private property' hypothesis, which posits that enlarged penises evolved to prevent the theft of property during sex. I tested this hypothesis in hermit crabs, which carry valuable portable property (a shell) and which must emerge from this shell during sex, risking social theft of their property by eavesdroppers. I measured relative penis size (penis-to-body ratio) for N = 328 specimens spanning nine closely related species. Species carrying more valuable, more easily stolen property had significantly larger penis size than species carrying less valuable, less easily stolen property, which, in turn, had larger penis size than species carrying no property at all. These patterns in penis size remained even when phylogeny was controlled for, and the patterns were not explained by alternative hypotheses. Instead, the results suggest larger penises evolved as morphological adaptations to facilitate safe sex, in which individuals retain their valuable property by extending a long penis outside the shell to copulate. This hypothesis may likewise apply to other taxa, including those with valuable but non-portable property.
topic comparative analyses
conflict and cooperation
private property
penis size
shells
social evolution
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.181760
work_keys_str_mv AT markelaidre privatepartsforprivatepropertyevolutionofpenissizewithmorevaluableeasilystolenshells
_version_ 1724433756765290496