Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose

Activation cross-sections for the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction was measured by using a stacked-foil activation technique combined with high purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectrometry over deuteron energy range of 2–24 MeV. Measured data were critically compared with the available literature data a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khandaker Mayeen Uddin, Haba Hiromitsu, Otuka Naohiko, Kassim Hasan Abu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714611029
id doaj-24e2f06aeaef4589ad62ebb14490f33c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24e2f06aeaef4589ad62ebb14490f33c2021-08-02T01:05:16ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2017-01-011461102910.1051/epjconf/201714611029epjconf-nd2016_11029Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purposeKhandaker Mayeen Uddin0Haba Hiromitsu1Otuka Naohiko2Kassim Hasan Abu3Department of Physics, University of MalayaNishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, RIKEN, WakoNuclear Data Section, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy AgencyDepartment of Physics, University of MalayaActivation cross-sections for the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction was measured by using a stacked-foil activation technique combined with high purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectrometry over deuteron energy range of 2–24 MeV. Measured data were critically compared with the available literature data and also with the theoretical data extracted from the TENDL data base. Accuracy of the 27Al(d,x)24Na cross-sections were confirmed by the simultaneous measurements of the natTi(d,x)48V monitor reaction cross-sections. Present results reproduced well the IAEA recommended natTi(d,x)48V reaction cross-sections, but provide slight deviation with the IAEA recommended 27Al(d,x)24Na cross-sections. It may be concluded that the use of 27Al(d,x)24Na in deuteron beam monitoring should not be a perfect choice if one has the option to use the natTi(d,x)48V reaction.https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714611029
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khandaker Mayeen Uddin
Haba Hiromitsu
Otuka Naohiko
Kassim Hasan Abu
spellingShingle Khandaker Mayeen Uddin
Haba Hiromitsu
Otuka Naohiko
Kassim Hasan Abu
Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Khandaker Mayeen Uddin
Haba Hiromitsu
Otuka Naohiko
Kassim Hasan Abu
author_sort Khandaker Mayeen Uddin
title Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
title_short Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
title_full Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
title_fullStr Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
title_sort investigation of the 27al(d,x)24na nuclear reaction for deuteron beam monitoring purpose
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Activation cross-sections for the 27Al(d,x)24Na nuclear reaction was measured by using a stacked-foil activation technique combined with high purity germanium (HPGe) γ-ray spectrometry over deuteron energy range of 2–24 MeV. Measured data were critically compared with the available literature data and also with the theoretical data extracted from the TENDL data base. Accuracy of the 27Al(d,x)24Na cross-sections were confirmed by the simultaneous measurements of the natTi(d,x)48V monitor reaction cross-sections. Present results reproduced well the IAEA recommended natTi(d,x)48V reaction cross-sections, but provide slight deviation with the IAEA recommended 27Al(d,x)24Na cross-sections. It may be concluded that the use of 27Al(d,x)24Na in deuteron beam monitoring should not be a perfect choice if one has the option to use the natTi(d,x)48V reaction.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714611029
work_keys_str_mv AT khandakermayeenuddin investigationofthe27aldx24nanuclearreactionfordeuteronbeammonitoringpurpose
AT habahiromitsu investigationofthe27aldx24nanuclearreactionfordeuteronbeammonitoringpurpose
AT otukanaohiko investigationofthe27aldx24nanuclearreactionfordeuteronbeammonitoringpurpose
AT kassimhasanabu investigationofthe27aldx24nanuclearreactionfordeuteronbeammonitoringpurpose
_version_ 1721245119659638784