Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions

It has been increasingly recognized that undertaking qualitative research can pose many challenges for researchers. However, scanty literature focuses directly on the experiences of doctoral research students from developing countries studying in Western Europe and other similar geographic regions,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juliana Siwale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015587560
id doaj-24dd0077e2794a2da00399d23cacf7e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24dd0077e2794a2da00399d23cacf7e12020-11-25T03:21:38ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402015-05-01510.1177/215824401558756010.1177_2158244015587560Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance InstitutionsJuliana Siwale0University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, UKIt has been increasingly recognized that undertaking qualitative research can pose many challenges for researchers. However, scanty literature focuses directly on the experiences of doctoral research students from developing countries studying in Western Europe and other similar geographic regions, and the challenges of doing fieldwork when they return “back home.” In this article, I use my experiences in the process of undertaking PhD fieldwork on two donor-funded microfinance institutions located in Zambia to demonstrate that doctoral students from specific regions (Africa in particular) undertaking research in their native countries can struggle to manage and make sense of the challenges and identity issues raised in their “familiar” environments. I also present a detailed discussion of how various gatekeepers and participants facilitated access, identity alteration, and the impact of insider–outsider positionality on collected data. It is concluded that organizational “politics” and local context can have significant bearing on power relationships, identities of researchers, and methodological preferences.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015587560
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliana Siwale
spellingShingle Juliana Siwale
Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
SAGE Open
author_facet Juliana Siwale
author_sort Juliana Siwale
title Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
title_short Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
title_full Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
title_fullStr Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions
title_sort why did i not prepare for this? the politics of negotiating fieldwork access, identity, and methodology in researching microfinance institutions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2015-05-01
description It has been increasingly recognized that undertaking qualitative research can pose many challenges for researchers. However, scanty literature focuses directly on the experiences of doctoral research students from developing countries studying in Western Europe and other similar geographic regions, and the challenges of doing fieldwork when they return “back home.” In this article, I use my experiences in the process of undertaking PhD fieldwork on two donor-funded microfinance institutions located in Zambia to demonstrate that doctoral students from specific regions (Africa in particular) undertaking research in their native countries can struggle to manage and make sense of the challenges and identity issues raised in their “familiar” environments. I also present a detailed discussion of how various gatekeepers and participants facilitated access, identity alteration, and the impact of insider–outsider positionality on collected data. It is concluded that organizational “politics” and local context can have significant bearing on power relationships, identities of researchers, and methodological preferences.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015587560
work_keys_str_mv AT julianasiwale whydidinotprepareforthisthepoliticsofnegotiatingfieldworkaccessidentityandmethodologyinresearchingmicrofinanceinstitutions
_version_ 1724613615878668288