Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK

AIM: To evaluate the early postoperative efficacy of SMART for myopia and compare it with TransPRK.<p>METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized controlled study. Totally 120 eyes of 60 patients with myopia who underwent SMART and TransPRK in our hospital from January to August 2018 were selected r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun-Di Yi, Jing Wang, Li-Ming Tao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2019-05-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/5/201905040.pdf
id doaj-24d8ee3494f544f9b4effaaa9dc950dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24d8ee3494f544f9b4effaaa9dc950dc2020-11-24T21:50:08ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232019-05-0119587087310.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.5.40Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRKYun-Di Yi0Jing Wang1Li-Ming Tao2Graduate Faculty of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province,ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui Province, ChinaAIM: To evaluate the early postoperative efficacy of SMART for myopia and compare it with TransPRK.<p>METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized controlled study. Totally 120 eyes of 60 patients with myopia who underwent SMART and TransPRK in our hospital from January to August 2018 were selected respectively. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), visual quality, pain score, corneal epithelial healing and subepithelial haze were compared between two groups.<p>RESULTS: There was no statistical differences between two groups regarding the proportion of UCVA reaching or exceeding 1.0 at 5d, 1mo and 3mo after operation(<i>P</i>>0.05), but the visual quality of SMART group was better than that of TransPRK group at 5d after operation(<i>P</i><0.05), and with the prolongation of time, the visual quality of the two groups gradually improved. There was a significant difference in pain scores between the TransPRK group and SMART group(3.56±0.96 <i>vs</i> 3.07±1.07; 1.22±0.61 <i>vs</i> 0.84±0.59)on the 1<sup>st</sup> day and 3<sup>rd</sup> day after operation(<i>P</i><0.01). 5d after operation, the complete recovery rate of corneal in TransPRK group was lower than that in SMART group(69.2% <i>vs</i> 83.3%, <i>P</i><0.05). At 1<sup>st</sup> and 3 mo after operation, there was no difference in haze between the two groups(5.0% <i>vs</i> 5.0% and 8.3% <i>vs</i> 10.0%; <i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between SMART and TransPRK in the speed and stability of visual acuity recovery, but the early postoperative pain of SMART is lighter, the corneal epithelium is healed faster, and the visual quality is better.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/5/201905040.pdfmyopiatransepithelial photorefractive keratectomysmart pulse technologydouble-pass optical quality analysis system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yun-Di Yi
Jing Wang
Li-Ming Tao
spellingShingle Yun-Di Yi
Jing Wang
Li-Ming Tao
Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
myopia
transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy
smart pulse technology
double-pass optical quality analysis system
author_facet Yun-Di Yi
Jing Wang
Li-Ming Tao
author_sort Yun-Di Yi
title Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
title_short Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
title_full Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
title_fullStr Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of early postoperative effects between SMART and TransPRK
title_sort comparison of early postoperative effects between smart and transprk
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
publishDate 2019-05-01
description AIM: To evaluate the early postoperative efficacy of SMART for myopia and compare it with TransPRK.<p>METHODS: Retrospective non-randomized controlled study. Totally 120 eyes of 60 patients with myopia who underwent SMART and TransPRK in our hospital from January to August 2018 were selected respectively. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), visual quality, pain score, corneal epithelial healing and subepithelial haze were compared between two groups.<p>RESULTS: There was no statistical differences between two groups regarding the proportion of UCVA reaching or exceeding 1.0 at 5d, 1mo and 3mo after operation(<i>P</i>>0.05), but the visual quality of SMART group was better than that of TransPRK group at 5d after operation(<i>P</i><0.05), and with the prolongation of time, the visual quality of the two groups gradually improved. There was a significant difference in pain scores between the TransPRK group and SMART group(3.56±0.96 <i>vs</i> 3.07±1.07; 1.22±0.61 <i>vs</i> 0.84±0.59)on the 1<sup>st</sup> day and 3<sup>rd</sup> day after operation(<i>P</i><0.01). 5d after operation, the complete recovery rate of corneal in TransPRK group was lower than that in SMART group(69.2% <i>vs</i> 83.3%, <i>P</i><0.05). At 1<sup>st</sup> and 3 mo after operation, there was no difference in haze between the two groups(5.0% <i>vs</i> 5.0% and 8.3% <i>vs</i> 10.0%; <i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between SMART and TransPRK in the speed and stability of visual acuity recovery, but the early postoperative pain of SMART is lighter, the corneal epithelium is healed faster, and the visual quality is better.
topic myopia
transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy
smart pulse technology
double-pass optical quality analysis system
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/5/201905040.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yundiyi comparisonofearlypostoperativeeffectsbetweensmartandtransprk
AT jingwang comparisonofearlypostoperativeeffectsbetweensmartandtransprk
AT limingtao comparisonofearlypostoperativeeffectsbetweensmartandtransprk
_version_ 1725885048925716480