structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge

One of the major issues in SLA is developing language tests that could produce good measures of implicit knowledge. This study examines the validity of an English Elicited Imitation (EI) test as a measure of L2 implicit grammatical knowledge. Forty freshman university students in Turkey took a set o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hedayat Sarandi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hacettepe University 2020-07-01
Series:Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ejal.info/index.php/ejal/article/view/34
id doaj-24d8791cfc5e4654aecedfcb988b26a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24d8791cfc5e4654aecedfcb988b26a42020-12-07T17:44:40ZengHacettepe UniversityEurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics2149-11352020-07-016226528434structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledgeHedayat Sarandi0Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim UniversityOne of the major issues in SLA is developing language tests that could produce good measures of implicit knowledge. This study examines the validity of an English Elicited Imitation (EI) test as a measure of L2 implicit grammatical knowledge. Forty freshman university students in Turkey took a set of language tests: an EI test, two storytelling tasks, a picture description task, IELTS listening sample tests and a speaking test. Four English morphemes were chosen as the target structures: third person ‘-s’, plural ‘-s’, simple past ‘-ed’, and comparative ‘-er’. Results from a principal component analysis showed that all measures were loaded on a single component labelled as implicit knowledge. Significant correlations with varying magnitude were also recorded between learners’ EI scores for the target structures and their scores on other time-pressured measures: r = .63, r = .63, r = .65 and r = .43, for third person ‘-s’, simple past ‘-ed’, plural ‘-s’ and comparative ‘-er’, respectively. These findings suggest that the likelihood of EI measuring L2 implicit grammatical knowledge may vary depending on language structures.https://www.ejal.info/index.php/ejal/article/view/34elicited imitationimplicit knowledgelearning english grammarsecond language acquisition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hedayat Sarandi
spellingShingle Hedayat Sarandi
structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics
elicited imitation
implicit knowledge
learning english grammar
second language acquisition
author_facet Hedayat Sarandi
author_sort Hedayat Sarandi
title structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
title_short structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
title_full structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
title_fullStr structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
title_full_unstemmed structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
title_sort structural sensitivity of elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge
publisher Hacettepe University
series Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics
issn 2149-1135
publishDate 2020-07-01
description One of the major issues in SLA is developing language tests that could produce good measures of implicit knowledge. This study examines the validity of an English Elicited Imitation (EI) test as a measure of L2 implicit grammatical knowledge. Forty freshman university students in Turkey took a set of language tests: an EI test, two storytelling tasks, a picture description task, IELTS listening sample tests and a speaking test. Four English morphemes were chosen as the target structures: third person ‘-s’, plural ‘-s’, simple past ‘-ed’, and comparative ‘-er’. Results from a principal component analysis showed that all measures were loaded on a single component labelled as implicit knowledge. Significant correlations with varying magnitude were also recorded between learners’ EI scores for the target structures and their scores on other time-pressured measures: r = .63, r = .63, r = .65 and r = .43, for third person ‘-s’, simple past ‘-ed’, plural ‘-s’ and comparative ‘-er’, respectively. These findings suggest that the likelihood of EI measuring L2 implicit grammatical knowledge may vary depending on language structures.
topic elicited imitation
implicit knowledge
learning english grammar
second language acquisition
url https://www.ejal.info/index.php/ejal/article/view/34
work_keys_str_mv AT hedayatsarandi structuralsensitivityofelicitedimitationasameasureofimplicitgrammaticalknowledge
_version_ 1724397343022776320