Fast responses on pre-industrial climate from present-day aerosols in a CMIP6 multi-model study

Fast responses on pre-industrial climate from present-day aerosols in a CMIP6 multi-model study

<p>In this work, we use Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations from 10 Earth system models (ESMs) and general circulation models (GCMs) to study the fast climate responses on pre-industrial climate, due to present-day aerosols. All models carried out two sets of simu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	P. Zanis, D. Akritidis, A. K. Georgoulias, R. J. Allen, S. E. Bauer, O. Boucher, J. Cole, B. Johnson, M. Deushi, M. Michou, J. Mulcahy, P. Nabat, D. Olivié, N. Oshima, A. Sima, M. Schulz, T. Takemura, K. Tsigaridis
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Copernicus Publications 2020-07-01
Series:	Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:	https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/8381/2020/acp-20-8381-2020.pdf

Similar Items

Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models
by: S. T. Turnock, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Climate-driven chemistry and aerosol feedbacks in CMIP6 Earth system models
by: G. Thornhill, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Bias in CMIP6 models as compared to observed regional dimming and brightening
by: K. O. Moseid, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Evaluating secondary inorganic aerosols in three dimensions
by: K. Mezuman, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)

Evaluation of ocean dimethylsulfide concentration and emission in CMIP6 models
by: J. Bock, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Present‐Day and Historical Aerosol and Ozone Characteristics in CNRM CMIP6 Simulations
by: M. Michou, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Global modelling of secondary organic aerosol in the troposphere: a sensitivity analysis
by: K. Tsigaridis, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

Can semi-volatile organic aerosols lead to fewer cloud particles?
by: C. Y. Gao, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

MATRIX-VBS (v1.0): implementing an evolving organic aerosol volatility in an aerosol microphysics model
by: C. Y. Gao, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01)

Change in global aerosol composition since preindustrial times
by: K. Tsigaridis, et al.
Published: (2006-01-01)

Estimating the direct and indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM
by: D. O'Donnell, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01)

AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6
by: W. J. Collins, et al.
Published: (2017-02-01)

Naturally driven variability in the global secondary organic aerosol over a decade
by: K. Tsigaridis, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01)

A global modeling study on carbonaceous aerosol microphysical characteristics and radiative effects
by: S. E. Bauer, et al.
Published: (2010-08-01)

Historical (1850–2014) Aerosol Evolution and Role on Climate Forcing Using the GISS ModelE2.1 Contribution to CMIP6
by: Susanne E. Bauer, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models
by: C. J. Smith, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Investigations on the anthropogenic reversal of the natural ozone gradient between northern and southern midlatitudes
by: D. D. Parrish, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

A complex aerosol transport event over Europe during the 2017 Storm Ophelia in CAMS forecast systems: analysis and evaluation
by: D. Akritidis, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Climate and air quality impacts due to mitigation of non-methane near-term climate forcers
by: R. J. Allen, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Formation of secondary organic aerosol from isoprene oxidation over Europe
by: M. Karl, et al.
Published: (2009-09-01)

Development and basic evaluation of a prognostic aerosol scheme (v1) in the CNRM Climate Model CNRM-CM6
by: M. Michou, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last 2 decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis
by: A. Mortier, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations
by: P. T. Griffiths, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

A multi-model evaluation of aerosols over South Asia: common problems and possible causes
by: X. Pan, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01)

Spatiotemporal variability and contribution of different aerosol types to the aerosol optical depth over the Eastern Mediterranean
by: A. K. Georgoulias, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

The interactive global fire module pyrE (v1.0)
by: K. Mezuman, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100
by: J. Keeble, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
by: L. C. Hahn, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison
by: G. D. Thornhill, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models
by: V. K. Arora, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): mineral dust
by: R. Checa-Garcia, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

On the impact of future climate change on tropopause folds and tropospheric ozone
by: D. Akritidis, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

First forcing estimates from the future CMIP6 scenarios of anthropogenic aerosol optical properties and an associated Twomey effect
by: S. Fiedler, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations
by: J. P. Mulcahy, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II
by: Z. Kipling, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

AeroCom phase III multi-model evaluation of the aerosol life cycle and optical properties using ground- and space-based remote sensing as well as surface in situ observations
by: J. Gliß, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6
by: K. Wyser, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Large gain in air quality compared to an alternative anthropogenic emissions scenario
by: N. Daskalakis, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01)

Estimating the CMIP6 Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Effects with the Advantage of Prescribed Aerosol Forcing
by: Xiangjun Shi, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model
by: U. Im, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)