Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.

Genome gigantism occurs so far in Phycodnaviridae and Mimiviridae (order Megavirales). Origin and evolution of these Giant Viruses (GVs) remain open questions. Interestingly, availability of a collection of closely related GV genomes enabling genomic comparisons offer the opportunity to better under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan eFilée
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00593/full
id doaj-24d019141aed4bba85c3ff5dbe901b44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24d019141aed4bba85c3ff5dbe901b442020-11-24T22:38:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2015-06-01610.3389/fmicb.2015.00593145040Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.Jonathan eFilée0CNRSGenome gigantism occurs so far in Phycodnaviridae and Mimiviridae (order Megavirales). Origin and evolution of these Giant Viruses (GVs) remain open questions. Interestingly, availability of a collection of closely related GV genomes enabling genomic comparisons offer the opportunity to better understand the different evolutionary forces acting on these genomes. Whole genome alignment for 5 groups of viruses belonging to the Mimiviridae and Phycodnaviridae families show that there is no trend of genome expansion or general tendency of genome contraction. Instead, GV genomes accumulated genomic mutations over the time with gene gains compensating the different losses. In addition, each lineage displays specific patterns of genome evolution. Mimiviridae (megaviruses and mimiviruses) and Chlorella Phycodnaviruses evolved mainly by duplications and losses of genes belonging to large paralogous families (including movements of diverse mobiles genetic elements), whereas Micromonas and Ostreococcus Phycodnaviruses derive most of their genetic novelties thought lateral gene transfers. Taken together, these data support an accordion-like model of evolution in which GV genomes have undergone successive steps of gene gain and gene loss, accrediting the hypothesis that genome gigantism appears early, before the diversification of the different GV lineages.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00593/fullGenomeevolutionduplicationmobile genetic elementsLateral gene transfergiant virus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan eFilée
spellingShingle Jonathan eFilée
Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
Frontiers in Microbiology
Genome
evolution
duplication
mobile genetic elements
Lateral gene transfer
giant virus
author_facet Jonathan eFilée
author_sort Jonathan eFilée
title Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
title_short Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
title_full Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
title_fullStr Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
title_full_unstemmed Genomic comparison of closely related Giant Viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
title_sort genomic comparison of closely related giant viruses supports an accordion-like model of evolution.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Genome gigantism occurs so far in Phycodnaviridae and Mimiviridae (order Megavirales). Origin and evolution of these Giant Viruses (GVs) remain open questions. Interestingly, availability of a collection of closely related GV genomes enabling genomic comparisons offer the opportunity to better understand the different evolutionary forces acting on these genomes. Whole genome alignment for 5 groups of viruses belonging to the Mimiviridae and Phycodnaviridae families show that there is no trend of genome expansion or general tendency of genome contraction. Instead, GV genomes accumulated genomic mutations over the time with gene gains compensating the different losses. In addition, each lineage displays specific patterns of genome evolution. Mimiviridae (megaviruses and mimiviruses) and Chlorella Phycodnaviruses evolved mainly by duplications and losses of genes belonging to large paralogous families (including movements of diverse mobiles genetic elements), whereas Micromonas and Ostreococcus Phycodnaviruses derive most of their genetic novelties thought lateral gene transfers. Taken together, these data support an accordion-like model of evolution in which GV genomes have undergone successive steps of gene gain and gene loss, accrediting the hypothesis that genome gigantism appears early, before the diversification of the different GV lineages.
topic Genome
evolution
duplication
mobile genetic elements
Lateral gene transfer
giant virus
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00593/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanefilee genomiccomparisonofcloselyrelatedgiantvirusessupportsanaccordionlikemodelofevolution
_version_ 1725711911809449984