Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention
Abstract Background Patient and public involvement and co‐production are widely used, but nevertheless contested concepts in applied health research. There is much confusion about what they are, how they might be undertaken and how they relate to each other. There are distinct challenges and particu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Health Expectations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13046 |
id |
doaj-24a71ccbc0d740539ad4b3539b37f8ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-24a71ccbc0d740539ad4b3539b37f8ae2020-11-25T03:16:29ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252020-06-0123365966910.1111/hex.13046Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex interventionMary Madden0Steph Morris1Margaret Ogden2David Lewis3Duncan Stewart4Jim McCambridge5University of York York UKUniversity of York York UKUniversity of York York UKUniversity of York York UKUniversity of York York UKUniversity of York York UKAbstract Background Patient and public involvement and co‐production are widely used, but nevertheless contested concepts in applied health research. There is much confusion about what they are, how they might be undertaken and how they relate to each other. There are distinct challenges and particular gaps in public involvement in alcohol research, especially when the study focus is on health matters other than alcohol dependence. Objective To explore how patient and public involvement and co‐production have been interpreted and applied within a multi‐disciplinary research programme in the development of a complex intervention on alcohol and medicine use in community pharmacies. Design The paper presents the authors' critical reflection on a grounded example of how public involvement concepts have been translated into practice in the intervention development phase of a publicly funded research programme, noting its impact on the programme to date. Discussion Co‐production adds another layer of complexity in the development of a complex intervention. The research planning requirements for publicly funded research circumscribe the possibilities for co‐production, including impacting on the possibility of stability and continuity over time.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13046alcoholcommunity pharmacycomplex interventionsco‐productionmedicines reviewpatient and public involvement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mary Madden Steph Morris Margaret Ogden David Lewis Duncan Stewart Jim McCambridge |
spellingShingle |
Mary Madden Steph Morris Margaret Ogden David Lewis Duncan Stewart Jim McCambridge Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention Health Expectations alcohol community pharmacy complex interventions co‐production medicines review patient and public involvement |
author_facet |
Mary Madden Steph Morris Margaret Ogden David Lewis Duncan Stewart Jim McCambridge |
author_sort |
Mary Madden |
title |
Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
title_short |
Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
title_full |
Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
title_fullStr |
Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
title_full_unstemmed |
Producing co‐production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
title_sort |
producing co‐production: reflections on the development of a complex intervention |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Health Expectations |
issn |
1369-6513 1369-7625 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Patient and public involvement and co‐production are widely used, but nevertheless contested concepts in applied health research. There is much confusion about what they are, how they might be undertaken and how they relate to each other. There are distinct challenges and particular gaps in public involvement in alcohol research, especially when the study focus is on health matters other than alcohol dependence. Objective To explore how patient and public involvement and co‐production have been interpreted and applied within a multi‐disciplinary research programme in the development of a complex intervention on alcohol and medicine use in community pharmacies. Design The paper presents the authors' critical reflection on a grounded example of how public involvement concepts have been translated into practice in the intervention development phase of a publicly funded research programme, noting its impact on the programme to date. Discussion Co‐production adds another layer of complexity in the development of a complex intervention. The research planning requirements for publicly funded research circumscribe the possibilities for co‐production, including impacting on the possibility of stability and continuity over time. |
topic |
alcohol community pharmacy complex interventions co‐production medicines review patient and public involvement |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13046 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marymadden producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention AT stephmorris producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention AT margaretogden producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention AT davidlewis producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention AT duncanstewart producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention AT jimmccambridge producingcoproductionreflectionsonthedevelopmentofacomplexintervention |
_version_ |
1724635897879592960 |