Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital

Abstract Objective: To determine seroprotection for the vaccine‐preventable diseases (VPDs) measles, mumps, rubella, varicella and hepatitis B among new employees seen at a Victorian tertiary hospital staff clinic. Methods: Employees who presented to the staff clinic for immunisation assessment betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eden C. Andrew, Katherine B. Gibney, Justin Denholm, Karin Leder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-06-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12508
id doaj-24a710057e4d49688d7385f5f5d27d04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24a710057e4d49688d7385f5f5d27d042020-11-24T22:15:47ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052016-06-0140328428910.1111/1753-6405.12508Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospitalEden C. Andrew0Katherine B. Gibney1Justin Denholm2Karin Leder3Victorian Infectious Disease Service Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity VictoriaVictorian Infectious Disease Service Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity VictoriaVictorian Infectious Disease Service Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity VictoriaVictorian Infectious Disease Service Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity VictoriaAbstract Objective: To determine seroprotection for the vaccine‐preventable diseases (VPDs) measles, mumps, rubella, varicella and hepatitis B among new employees seen at a Victorian tertiary hospital staff clinic. Methods: Employees who presented to the staff clinic for immunisation assessment between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 were included. Demographic data, self‐reported disease history and previous vaccination status were reviewed retrospectively to determine impact on serological results. Results: A total of 1,901 new employees were included, 83% of whom were at risk of direct contact with blood or body substances. Overall, the proportion of workers seropositive to measles was 88%, mumps 90%, rubella 78%, varicella 93% and hepatitis B 80%. Staff born before 1966 were more likely to have positive measles or mumps serology but negative rubella or hepatitis B serology (p<0.05 for each). Staff who self‐reported measles (99% vs. 93%, p=0.03) or varicella infection (98% vs. 92%, p<0.001) were more likely to be seropositive, but those reporting previous vaccination to measles, mumps or rubella were no more likely to be seropositive. Conclusions and implications: This study demonstrated levels of seropositivity of 78–93% for the five VPDs. Despite recognised limitations of serological testing, 10–20% of new employees to a healthcare institution lacking seroprotection represents a potentially unacceptable risk of nosocomial transmission of these VPDs. Our findings support ongoing serological testing of new healthcare staff at risk of direct contact with blood or body substances.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12508vaccinationimmunisationvaccine‐preventable diseasesnosocomial infection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eden C. Andrew
Katherine B. Gibney
Justin Denholm
Karin Leder
spellingShingle Eden C. Andrew
Katherine B. Gibney
Justin Denholm
Karin Leder
Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
vaccination
immunisation
vaccine‐preventable diseases
nosocomial infection
author_facet Eden C. Andrew
Katherine B. Gibney
Justin Denholm
Karin Leder
author_sort Eden C. Andrew
title Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
title_short Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
title_full Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
title_fullStr Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
title_full_unstemmed Seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a Victorian tertiary hospital
title_sort seroprotection to vaccine‐preventable diseases among workers at a victorian tertiary hospital
publisher Wiley
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Abstract Objective: To determine seroprotection for the vaccine‐preventable diseases (VPDs) measles, mumps, rubella, varicella and hepatitis B among new employees seen at a Victorian tertiary hospital staff clinic. Methods: Employees who presented to the staff clinic for immunisation assessment between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 were included. Demographic data, self‐reported disease history and previous vaccination status were reviewed retrospectively to determine impact on serological results. Results: A total of 1,901 new employees were included, 83% of whom were at risk of direct contact with blood or body substances. Overall, the proportion of workers seropositive to measles was 88%, mumps 90%, rubella 78%, varicella 93% and hepatitis B 80%. Staff born before 1966 were more likely to have positive measles or mumps serology but negative rubella or hepatitis B serology (p<0.05 for each). Staff who self‐reported measles (99% vs. 93%, p=0.03) or varicella infection (98% vs. 92%, p<0.001) were more likely to be seropositive, but those reporting previous vaccination to measles, mumps or rubella were no more likely to be seropositive. Conclusions and implications: This study demonstrated levels of seropositivity of 78–93% for the five VPDs. Despite recognised limitations of serological testing, 10–20% of new employees to a healthcare institution lacking seroprotection represents a potentially unacceptable risk of nosocomial transmission of these VPDs. Our findings support ongoing serological testing of new healthcare staff at risk of direct contact with blood or body substances.
topic vaccination
immunisation
vaccine‐preventable diseases
nosocomial infection
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12508
work_keys_str_mv AT edencandrew seroprotectiontovaccinepreventablediseasesamongworkersatavictoriantertiaryhospital
AT katherinebgibney seroprotectiontovaccinepreventablediseasesamongworkersatavictoriantertiaryhospital
AT justindenholm seroprotectiontovaccinepreventablediseasesamongworkersatavictoriantertiaryhospital
AT karinleder seroprotectiontovaccinepreventablediseasesamongworkersatavictoriantertiaryhospital
_version_ 1725793065447194624