Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit

Abstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustafa Al-Yassary, Kelly Billiaert, Gregory S. Antonarakis, Stavros Kiliaridis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7
id doaj-249f2a7d996045ebbd8fc2022610ff28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-249f2a7d996045ebbd8fc2022610ff282021-10-10T11:31:53ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-10-011111910.1038/s41598-021-99459-7Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unitMustafa Al-Yassary0Kelly Billiaert1Gregory S. Antonarakis2Stavros Kiliaridis3Division of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaAbstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a cervical range of motion (CROM) device. The reproducibility of the hunter and mirror-guided head posture was also evaluated. In vitro and in vivo tests were carried out to assess the validity of the IMU. To assess reproducibility, thirty healthy young adults were asked to look at four different locations in two different sessions while the head posture was recorded. Excellent correlation (r = 0.99; p < 0.001) was found between the IMU and CROM device with an absolute mean difference of 0.45° ± 0.58° (p = 0.85) for the in vitro test and 0.88° ± 1.20° (p = 0.99) for the in vivo test. For the reproducibility test, moderate to good correlation coefficients were found (r = 0.55 to 0.89; all p < 0.05) between the two sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from moderate to excellent reliability (ICC from 0.74 to 0.96). These results suggest that the IMU sensors, when calibrated correctly, can be adequate to analyze head posture.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mustafa Al-Yassary
Kelly Billiaert
Gregory S. Antonarakis
Stavros Kiliaridis
spellingShingle Mustafa Al-Yassary
Kelly Billiaert
Gregory S. Antonarakis
Stavros Kiliaridis
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
Scientific Reports
author_facet Mustafa Al-Yassary
Kelly Billiaert
Gregory S. Antonarakis
Stavros Kiliaridis
author_sort Mustafa Al-Yassary
title Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
title_short Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
title_full Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
title_fullStr Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
title_sort evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Abstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a cervical range of motion (CROM) device. The reproducibility of the hunter and mirror-guided head posture was also evaluated. In vitro and in vivo tests were carried out to assess the validity of the IMU. To assess reproducibility, thirty healthy young adults were asked to look at four different locations in two different sessions while the head posture was recorded. Excellent correlation (r = 0.99; p < 0.001) was found between the IMU and CROM device with an absolute mean difference of 0.45° ± 0.58° (p = 0.85) for the in vitro test and 0.88° ± 1.20° (p = 0.99) for the in vivo test. For the reproducibility test, moderate to good correlation coefficients were found (r = 0.55 to 0.89; all p < 0.05) between the two sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from moderate to excellent reliability (ICC from 0.74 to 0.96). These results suggest that the IMU sensors, when calibrated correctly, can be adequate to analyze head posture.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafaalyassary evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit
AT kellybilliaert evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit
AT gregorysantonarakis evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit
AT stavroskiliaridis evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit
_version_ 1716829652118405120