Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit
Abstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7 |
id |
doaj-249f2a7d996045ebbd8fc2022610ff28 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-249f2a7d996045ebbd8fc2022610ff282021-10-10T11:31:53ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-10-011111910.1038/s41598-021-99459-7Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unitMustafa Al-Yassary0Kelly Billiaert1Gregory S. Antonarakis2Stavros Kiliaridis3Division of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaDivision of Orthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of GenevaAbstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a cervical range of motion (CROM) device. The reproducibility of the hunter and mirror-guided head posture was also evaluated. In vitro and in vivo tests were carried out to assess the validity of the IMU. To assess reproducibility, thirty healthy young adults were asked to look at four different locations in two different sessions while the head posture was recorded. Excellent correlation (r = 0.99; p < 0.001) was found between the IMU and CROM device with an absolute mean difference of 0.45° ± 0.58° (p = 0.85) for the in vitro test and 0.88° ± 1.20° (p = 0.99) for the in vivo test. For the reproducibility test, moderate to good correlation coefficients were found (r = 0.55 to 0.89; all p < 0.05) between the two sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from moderate to excellent reliability (ICC from 0.74 to 0.96). These results suggest that the IMU sensors, when calibrated correctly, can be adequate to analyze head posture.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mustafa Al-Yassary Kelly Billiaert Gregory S. Antonarakis Stavros Kiliaridis |
spellingShingle |
Mustafa Al-Yassary Kelly Billiaert Gregory S. Antonarakis Stavros Kiliaridis Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Mustafa Al-Yassary Kelly Billiaert Gregory S. Antonarakis Stavros Kiliaridis |
author_sort |
Mustafa Al-Yassary |
title |
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
title_short |
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
title_full |
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
title_sort |
evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
Abstract An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is an electronic device that measures and track the orientation of a body. We conducted this study in accordance with the STARD guidelines to evaluate the accuracy of IMU (index test) for measuring head posture compared to the current gold standard using a cervical range of motion (CROM) device. The reproducibility of the hunter and mirror-guided head posture was also evaluated. In vitro and in vivo tests were carried out to assess the validity of the IMU. To assess reproducibility, thirty healthy young adults were asked to look at four different locations in two different sessions while the head posture was recorded. Excellent correlation (r = 0.99; p < 0.001) was found between the IMU and CROM device with an absolute mean difference of 0.45° ± 0.58° (p = 0.85) for the in vitro test and 0.88° ± 1.20° (p = 0.99) for the in vivo test. For the reproducibility test, moderate to good correlation coefficients were found (r = 0.55 to 0.89; all p < 0.05) between the two sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from moderate to excellent reliability (ICC from 0.74 to 0.96). These results suggest that the IMU sensors, when calibrated correctly, can be adequate to analyze head posture. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99459-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mustafaalyassary evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit AT kellybilliaert evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit AT gregorysantonarakis evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit AT stavroskiliaridis evaluationofheadpostureusinganinertialmeasurementunit |
_version_ |
1716829652118405120 |