Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?

In 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabrine Cipriano, Catherine Fallon, Perrine Fastré, Jordan Halin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles 2015-03-01
Series:Brussels Studies
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268
id doaj-2499ad78dbee4b489f473c75b9e08fec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2499ad78dbee4b489f473c75b9e08fec2020-11-24T21:27:51ZengUniversité Saint-Louis BruxellesBrussels Studies2031-02932015-03-0110.4000/brussels.1268Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?Sabrine CiprianoCatherine FallonPerrine FastréJordan HalinIn 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Region. This article takes a reflective look at its results, obtained from case studies and focus groups. It provides an operational overview of the coordination mechanisms which have been implemented, according to the point of view of stakeholders involved in the New Deal: do these new methods of cooperation reveal the emergence of a new public governance in the Brussels Region? It shows that the transformations targeted by the New Deal in the area of governance between stakeholders in Brussels are characterised by the will for the transversality of public intervention, but in the end remain limited by the institutional division which it claims to transcend. The method of coordination, which is too informal and dependent on the stakeholders present – and even on people – and their means, would benefit from reinforcement, to guarantee the continuity of the approach and ensure that coordination is not reduced to a juxtaposition of stakeholders.http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sabrine Cipriano
Catherine Fallon
Perrine Fastré
Jordan Halin
spellingShingle Sabrine Cipriano
Catherine Fallon
Perrine Fastré
Jordan Halin
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
Brussels Studies
author_facet Sabrine Cipriano
Catherine Fallon
Perrine Fastré
Jordan Halin
author_sort Sabrine Cipriano
title Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
title_short Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
title_full Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
title_fullStr Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
title_sort evaluatie van de transversale acties van de new deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de brusselaars?
publisher Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles
series Brussels Studies
issn 2031-0293
publishDate 2015-03-01
description In 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Region. This article takes a reflective look at its results, obtained from case studies and focus groups. It provides an operational overview of the coordination mechanisms which have been implemented, according to the point of view of stakeholders involved in the New Deal: do these new methods of cooperation reveal the emergence of a new public governance in the Brussels Region? It shows that the transformations targeted by the New Deal in the area of governance between stakeholders in Brussels are characterised by the will for the transversality of public intervention, but in the end remain limited by the institutional division which it claims to transcend. The method of coordination, which is too informal and dependent on the stakeholders present – and even on people – and their means, would benefit from reinforcement, to guarantee the continuity of the approach and ensure that coordination is not reduced to a juxtaposition of stakeholders.
url http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268
work_keys_str_mv AT sabrinecipriano evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars
AT catherinefallon evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars
AT perrinefastre evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars
AT jordanhalin evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars
_version_ 1725972924275359744