Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?
In 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Reg...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Brussels Studies |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268 |
id |
doaj-2499ad78dbee4b489f473c75b9e08fec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2499ad78dbee4b489f473c75b9e08fec2020-11-24T21:27:51ZengUniversité Saint-Louis BruxellesBrussels Studies2031-02932015-03-0110.4000/brussels.1268Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars?Sabrine CiprianoCatherine FallonPerrine FastréJordan HalinIn 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Region. This article takes a reflective look at its results, obtained from case studies and focus groups. It provides an operational overview of the coordination mechanisms which have been implemented, according to the point of view of stakeholders involved in the New Deal: do these new methods of cooperation reveal the emergence of a new public governance in the Brussels Region? It shows that the transformations targeted by the New Deal in the area of governance between stakeholders in Brussels are characterised by the will for the transversality of public intervention, but in the end remain limited by the institutional division which it claims to transcend. The method of coordination, which is too informal and dependent on the stakeholders present – and even on people – and their means, would benefit from reinforcement, to guarantee the continuity of the approach and ensure that coordination is not reduced to a juxtaposition of stakeholders.http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sabrine Cipriano Catherine Fallon Perrine Fastré Jordan Halin |
spellingShingle |
Sabrine Cipriano Catherine Fallon Perrine Fastré Jordan Halin Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? Brussels Studies |
author_facet |
Sabrine Cipriano Catherine Fallon Perrine Fastré Jordan Halin |
author_sort |
Sabrine Cipriano |
title |
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? |
title_short |
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? |
title_full |
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? |
title_fullStr |
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluatie van de transversale acties van de New Deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de Brusselaars? |
title_sort |
evaluatie van de transversale acties van de new deal: operationele partnerschappen voor de tewerkstelling van de brusselaars? |
publisher |
Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles |
series |
Brussels Studies |
issn |
2031-0293 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
In 2011, social partners and the Brussels government signed the New Deal, aimed at reinforcing the coherence of the Brussels employment policy through partnerships between the stakeholders concerned, both private and public. The evaluation of this public policy is a first in the Brussels-Capital Region. This article takes a reflective look at its results, obtained from case studies and focus groups. It provides an operational overview of the coordination mechanisms which have been implemented, according to the point of view of stakeholders involved in the New Deal: do these new methods of cooperation reveal the emergence of a new public governance in the Brussels Region? It shows that the transformations targeted by the New Deal in the area of governance between stakeholders in Brussels are characterised by the will for the transversality of public intervention, but in the end remain limited by the institutional division which it claims to transcend. The method of coordination, which is too informal and dependent on the stakeholders present – and even on people – and their means, would benefit from reinforcement, to guarantee the continuity of the approach and ensure that coordination is not reduced to a juxtaposition of stakeholders. |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1268 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sabrinecipriano evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars AT catherinefallon evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars AT perrinefastre evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars AT jordanhalin evaluatievandetransversaleactiesvandenewdealoperationelepartnerschappenvoordetewerkstellingvandebrusselaars |
_version_ |
1725972924275359744 |