Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
<p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kine...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2001-09-01
|
Series: | Geochemical Transactions |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 |
id |
doaj-248efd96a9ac479eba8887198fd5619a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-248efd96a9ac479eba8887198fd5619a2020-11-25T00:19:21ZengBMCGeochemical Transactions1467-48662001-09-01216510.1186/1467-4866-2-65Metal–organic complexation in the marine environmentWitter AmyRozan Timothy FLuther George WLewis Brent<p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample.</p> http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Witter Amy Rozan Timothy F Luther George W Lewis Brent |
spellingShingle |
Witter Amy Rozan Timothy F Luther George W Lewis Brent Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment Geochemical Transactions |
author_facet |
Witter Amy Rozan Timothy F Luther George W Lewis Brent |
author_sort |
Witter Amy |
title |
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_short |
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_full |
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_fullStr |
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_sort |
metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Geochemical Transactions |
issn |
1467-4866 |
publishDate |
2001-09-01 |
description |
<p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample.</p> |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT witteramy metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT rozantimothyf metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT luthergeorgew metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT lewisbrent metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment |
_version_ |
1725371884315344896 |