Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment

<p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Witter Amy, Rozan Timothy F, Luther George W, Lewis Brent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2001-09-01
Series:Geochemical Transactions
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65
id doaj-248efd96a9ac479eba8887198fd5619a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-248efd96a9ac479eba8887198fd5619a2020-11-25T00:19:21ZengBMCGeochemical Transactions1467-48662001-09-01216510.1186/1467-4866-2-65Metal–organic complexation in the marine environmentWitter AmyRozan Timothy FLuther George WLewis Brent<p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample.</p> http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Witter Amy
Rozan Timothy F
Luther George W
Lewis Brent
spellingShingle Witter Amy
Rozan Timothy F
Luther George W
Lewis Brent
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
Geochemical Transactions
author_facet Witter Amy
Rozan Timothy F
Luther George W
Lewis Brent
author_sort Witter Amy
title Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_short Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_full Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_fullStr Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_full_unstemmed Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_sort metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
publisher BMC
series Geochemical Transactions
issn 1467-4866
publishDate 2001-09-01
description <p/> <p>We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample.</p>
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65
work_keys_str_mv AT witteramy metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT rozantimothyf metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT luthergeorgew metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT lewisbrent metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
_version_ 1725371884315344896