The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India
Executive Summary This paper estimates the impact of public investment on private investment in India during 1970-2013 using ARDL procedure developed by Pesaran and Shin (1999) and Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001) by incorporating endogenously determined structural break in the model. The base line r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Vikalpa |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916676439 |
id |
doaj-247fa6226b7b483ab0a9c18810195a63 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-247fa6226b7b483ab0a9c18810195a632021-04-02T15:42:55ZengSAGE PublishingVikalpa0256-09092016-12-014110.1177/0256090916676439The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from IndiaPradyumna Dash0 is Associate Professor of Economics at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Raipur. He served as an Assistant Professor of Economics at IIM Indore from 2007 to 2012. He was awarded a Gold Medal from Sambalpur University for securing first position in MA in Economics. He has qualified the National Eligibility Test (NET) and has a Ph.D. from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay. His articles have been published in refereed academic journals, such as and in forums like and . His principal fields of research are macroeconomics, monetary economics, and applied econometrics. E-mail: Executive Summary This paper estimates the impact of public investment on private investment in India during 1970-2013 using ARDL procedure developed by Pesaran and Shin (1999) and Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001) by incorporating endogenously determined structural break in the model. The base line result implies that a 1 per cent increase in public investment as a ratio to GDP leads to 0.81 per cent and 0.53 per cent decrease in private investment as a ratio to GDP in the long run (about 4 to 5 years) and short run (about 2 to 3 years), respectively, after controlling for economic conditions. To address the concern that the results may be driven by government consumption expenditure, fiscal deficit, or inadequate infrastructure, the analysis was repeated by estimating the investment function after including these variables and similar results were obtained. The investment regression was also estimated for a shorter sample period (1978–2013) to get the same result. It is observed that the crowding out effect of public investment on private investment has dampened during the post-liberalization period. The results also reveal that a “market friendly” incumbent and an increase in foreign direct investment dampen the magnitude of the crowding out effect of public investment. Formal tests were conducted to examine whether the crowding out effect was driven by political uncertainty and political business cycle channels but no evidence for the same is found. The results also reveal that public infrastructure (represented by kms of roads per capita) has a positive effect on private investment in the short run. This is similar to the findings by Blejer and Khan (1984) that while public infrastructure investment is complementary to private investment, other kinds of public investment lead to crowding out of private investment. This suggests that public investment should be more focused on goods and services which are enjoyed or consumed by many consumers simultaneously and non-excludable in nature with significant positive externalities. In this model, a single endogenously determined structural break was included and the possibility of multiple breaks was excluded. There is a scope to increase multiple structural breaks and re-investigate the impact of public investment on private investment in India in future studies.https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916676439 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pradyumna Dash |
spellingShingle |
Pradyumna Dash The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India Vikalpa |
author_facet |
Pradyumna Dash |
author_sort |
Pradyumna Dash |
title |
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India |
title_short |
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India |
title_full |
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment: Evidence from India |
title_sort |
impact of public investment on private investment: evidence from india |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Vikalpa |
issn |
0256-0909 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Executive Summary This paper estimates the impact of public investment on private investment in India during 1970-2013 using ARDL procedure developed by Pesaran and Shin (1999) and Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (2001) by incorporating endogenously determined structural break in the model. The base line result implies that a 1 per cent increase in public investment as a ratio to GDP leads to 0.81 per cent and 0.53 per cent decrease in private investment as a ratio to GDP in the long run (about 4 to 5 years) and short run (about 2 to 3 years), respectively, after controlling for economic conditions. To address the concern that the results may be driven by government consumption expenditure, fiscal deficit, or inadequate infrastructure, the analysis was repeated by estimating the investment function after including these variables and similar results were obtained. The investment regression was also estimated for a shorter sample period (1978–2013) to get the same result. It is observed that the crowding out effect of public investment on private investment has dampened during the post-liberalization period. The results also reveal that a “market friendly” incumbent and an increase in foreign direct investment dampen the magnitude of the crowding out effect of public investment. Formal tests were conducted to examine whether the crowding out effect was driven by political uncertainty and political business cycle channels but no evidence for the same is found. The results also reveal that public infrastructure (represented by kms of roads per capita) has a positive effect on private investment in the short run. This is similar to the findings by Blejer and Khan (1984) that while public infrastructure investment is complementary to private investment, other kinds of public investment lead to crowding out of private investment. This suggests that public investment should be more focused on goods and services which are enjoyed or consumed by many consumers simultaneously and non-excludable in nature with significant positive externalities. In this model, a single endogenously determined structural break was included and the possibility of multiple breaks was excluded. There is a scope to increase multiple structural breaks and re-investigate the impact of public investment on private investment in India in future studies. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090916676439 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pradyumnadash theimpactofpublicinvestmentonprivateinvestmentevidencefromindia AT pradyumnadash impactofpublicinvestmentonprivateinvestmentevidencefromindia |
_version_ |
1721559315631833088 |