The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa

There is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tafadzwa Shumba, Alta De Vos, Reinette Biggs, Karen J. Esler, Hayley S. Clements
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201
id doaj-2474d8387e8946d3af6a0990e54a4169
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2474d8387e8946d3af6a0990e54a41692021-08-12T04:34:37ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942021-08-0128e01670The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South AfricaTafadzwa Shumba0Alta De Vos1Reinette Biggs2Karen J. Esler3Hayley S. Clements4Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Department of Natural Resources Management, Marondera University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Marondera, Zimbabwe; Panthera, 8 West 40th St, New York, NY, 10018, USA; Correspondence to: Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University, South Africa.Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South AfricaCentre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South AfricaDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South AfricaCentre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, FinlandThere is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness in conserving biodiversity. Here, we investigated how the effectiveness of South African PLCAs in conserving biodiversity varied across social-ecological contexts, using natural land cover as a proxy. Social-ecological contexts were represented by biophysical and legal factors (distance to towns and roads, elevation, slope, terrain ruggedness, rainfall, PLCA size, distance to state-owned national parks, and presence of legal protection) and, for a subset of commercially-operated PLCAs, management factors (adopted business model, and profitability). Biophysical and legal contextual factors had low explanatory power in the best model for the nationwide analysis (n = 5121 PLCAs). For a subset of PLCAs (n = 72) we found that effectiveness depended on the strategy they adopted to generate an income, as opposed to the amount of income itself. PLCAs that attracted high volumes of visitors to small properties to view charismatic “Big 5” wildlife were less effective in conserving natural land cover than larger, more exclusive “Big 5” PLCAs and those focused on hunting. Overall, site-specific management factors were better at explaining the effectiveness of PLCAs than biophysical factors. Our findings indicate that conservation practitioners and policy makers need to recognise the diverse goals, motivations and management models of PLCAs when considering how to support them in conserving biodiversity. Future studies could explore whether these trends hold for other proxies of biodiversity conservation, beyond land cover change.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201BiodiversityEcotourismHuntingManagement strategiesNatural land cover changePrivately protected area
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tafadzwa Shumba
Alta De Vos
Reinette Biggs
Karen J. Esler
Hayley S. Clements
spellingShingle Tafadzwa Shumba
Alta De Vos
Reinette Biggs
Karen J. Esler
Hayley S. Clements
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
Global Ecology and Conservation
Biodiversity
Ecotourism
Hunting
Management strategies
Natural land cover change
Privately protected area
author_facet Tafadzwa Shumba
Alta De Vos
Reinette Biggs
Karen J. Esler
Hayley S. Clements
author_sort Tafadzwa Shumba
title The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
title_short The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
title_full The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
title_fullStr The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
title_sort influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across south africa
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2021-08-01
description There is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness in conserving biodiversity. Here, we investigated how the effectiveness of South African PLCAs in conserving biodiversity varied across social-ecological contexts, using natural land cover as a proxy. Social-ecological contexts were represented by biophysical and legal factors (distance to towns and roads, elevation, slope, terrain ruggedness, rainfall, PLCA size, distance to state-owned national parks, and presence of legal protection) and, for a subset of commercially-operated PLCAs, management factors (adopted business model, and profitability). Biophysical and legal contextual factors had low explanatory power in the best model for the nationwide analysis (n = 5121 PLCAs). For a subset of PLCAs (n = 72) we found that effectiveness depended on the strategy they adopted to generate an income, as opposed to the amount of income itself. PLCAs that attracted high volumes of visitors to small properties to view charismatic “Big 5” wildlife were less effective in conserving natural land cover than larger, more exclusive “Big 5” PLCAs and those focused on hunting. Overall, site-specific management factors were better at explaining the effectiveness of PLCAs than biophysical factors. Our findings indicate that conservation practitioners and policy makers need to recognise the diverse goals, motivations and management models of PLCAs when considering how to support them in conserving biodiversity. Future studies could explore whether these trends hold for other proxies of biodiversity conservation, beyond land cover change.
topic Biodiversity
Ecotourism
Hunting
Management strategies
Natural land cover change
Privately protected area
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201
work_keys_str_mv AT tafadzwashumba theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT altadevos theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT reinettebiggs theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT karenjesler theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT hayleysclements theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT tafadzwashumba influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT altadevos influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT reinettebiggs influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT karenjesler influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
AT hayleysclements influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica
_version_ 1721209843869548544