The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa
There is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Global Ecology and Conservation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201 |
id |
doaj-2474d8387e8946d3af6a0990e54a4169 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2474d8387e8946d3af6a0990e54a41692021-08-12T04:34:37ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942021-08-0128e01670The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South AfricaTafadzwa Shumba0Alta De Vos1Reinette Biggs2Karen J. Esler3Hayley S. Clements4Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Department of Natural Resources Management, Marondera University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Marondera, Zimbabwe; Panthera, 8 West 40th St, New York, NY, 10018, USA; Correspondence to: Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology Stellenbosch University, South Africa.Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South AfricaCentre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South AfricaDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South AfricaCentre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, FinlandThere is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness in conserving biodiversity. Here, we investigated how the effectiveness of South African PLCAs in conserving biodiversity varied across social-ecological contexts, using natural land cover as a proxy. Social-ecological contexts were represented by biophysical and legal factors (distance to towns and roads, elevation, slope, terrain ruggedness, rainfall, PLCA size, distance to state-owned national parks, and presence of legal protection) and, for a subset of commercially-operated PLCAs, management factors (adopted business model, and profitability). Biophysical and legal contextual factors had low explanatory power in the best model for the nationwide analysis (n = 5121 PLCAs). For a subset of PLCAs (n = 72) we found that effectiveness depended on the strategy they adopted to generate an income, as opposed to the amount of income itself. PLCAs that attracted high volumes of visitors to small properties to view charismatic “Big 5” wildlife were less effective in conserving natural land cover than larger, more exclusive “Big 5” PLCAs and those focused on hunting. Overall, site-specific management factors were better at explaining the effectiveness of PLCAs than biophysical factors. Our findings indicate that conservation practitioners and policy makers need to recognise the diverse goals, motivations and management models of PLCAs when considering how to support them in conserving biodiversity. Future studies could explore whether these trends hold for other proxies of biodiversity conservation, beyond land cover change.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201BiodiversityEcotourismHuntingManagement strategiesNatural land cover changePrivately protected area |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tafadzwa Shumba Alta De Vos Reinette Biggs Karen J. Esler Hayley S. Clements |
spellingShingle |
Tafadzwa Shumba Alta De Vos Reinette Biggs Karen J. Esler Hayley S. Clements The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa Global Ecology and Conservation Biodiversity Ecotourism Hunting Management strategies Natural land cover change Privately protected area |
author_facet |
Tafadzwa Shumba Alta De Vos Reinette Biggs Karen J. Esler Hayley S. Clements |
author_sort |
Tafadzwa Shumba |
title |
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa |
title_short |
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa |
title_full |
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa |
title_fullStr |
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across South Africa |
title_sort |
influence of biophysical and socio-economic factors on the effectiveness of private land conservation areas in preventing natural land cover loss across south africa |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Global Ecology and Conservation |
issn |
2351-9894 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
There is increasing interest in the potential of private land conservation areas (PLCAs) as a complementary biodiversity conservation strategy to state-owned protected areas. However, there is limited understanding of how the diverse social-ecological contexts of PLCAs influence their effectiveness in conserving biodiversity. Here, we investigated how the effectiveness of South African PLCAs in conserving biodiversity varied across social-ecological contexts, using natural land cover as a proxy. Social-ecological contexts were represented by biophysical and legal factors (distance to towns and roads, elevation, slope, terrain ruggedness, rainfall, PLCA size, distance to state-owned national parks, and presence of legal protection) and, for a subset of commercially-operated PLCAs, management factors (adopted business model, and profitability). Biophysical and legal contextual factors had low explanatory power in the best model for the nationwide analysis (n = 5121 PLCAs). For a subset of PLCAs (n = 72) we found that effectiveness depended on the strategy they adopted to generate an income, as opposed to the amount of income itself. PLCAs that attracted high volumes of visitors to small properties to view charismatic “Big 5” wildlife were less effective in conserving natural land cover than larger, more exclusive “Big 5” PLCAs and those focused on hunting. Overall, site-specific management factors were better at explaining the effectiveness of PLCAs than biophysical factors. Our findings indicate that conservation practitioners and policy makers need to recognise the diverse goals, motivations and management models of PLCAs when considering how to support them in conserving biodiversity. Future studies could explore whether these trends hold for other proxies of biodiversity conservation, beyond land cover change. |
topic |
Biodiversity Ecotourism Hunting Management strategies Natural land cover change Privately protected area |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002201 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tafadzwashumba theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT altadevos theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT reinettebiggs theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT karenjesler theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT hayleysclements theinfluenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT tafadzwashumba influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT altadevos influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT reinettebiggs influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT karenjesler influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica AT hayleysclements influenceofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicfactorsontheeffectivenessofprivatelandconservationareasinpreventingnaturallandcoverlossacrosssouthafrica |
_version_ |
1721209843869548544 |