Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rueda Antonio, Casanova María, Redondo Maximino, Pérez-Ruiz Elisabeth, Medina-Pérez Ángeles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-05-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/210
id doaj-246736aa11b44dc58f41b35786132503
record_format Article
spelling doaj-246736aa11b44dc58f41b357861325032020-11-24T22:22:58ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072012-05-0112121010.1186/1471-2407-12-210Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?Rueda AntonioCasanova MaríaRedondo MaximinoPérez-Ruiz ElisabethMedina-Pérez Ángeles<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating patients with asymptomatic FL at the onset of the disease did not increase their survival, and that almost 20% of these patients did not need any treatment in the first 10 years of follow-up. Based on these facts, most clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance policies for patients with asymptomatic FL.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The introduction of antiCD-20 monoclonal antibodies, over the last 15 years, has significantly increased the median survival rate to above 14 years. This improvement was achieved before the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy regimens became extensively used in patients with symptomatic disease. Therefore, this increase in survival may currently be more significant. At present, several clinical trials have evaluated low-toxicity therapies that prolong progression-free periods, among which rituximab monotherapy, radioimmunotherapy or the combination of rituximab with bendamustine are the most relevant. Unfortunately, these clinical trials have included only patients with symptomatic FL. The results of a recently reported clinical trial show that treatment with single-agent rituximab prolongs progression-free survival rates, time to new treatment and the quality of life of asymptomatic patients, as compared with the active surveillance strategy. Longer follow-up of these results and data regarding overall survival are awaited before this treatment can be recommended as the standard initial therapy.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>There are different therapeutic possibilities for asymptomatic FL patients, but no data are currently available to indicate which option is the best. Patients need to understand the risks and benefits of observation versus treatment before a final decision can be made. For patients who want active treatment the administration of four weekly rituximab doses should be considered.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/210
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rueda Antonio
Casanova María
Redondo Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez Ángeles
spellingShingle Rueda Antonio
Casanova María
Redondo Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez Ángeles
Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
BMC Cancer
author_facet Rueda Antonio
Casanova María
Redondo Maximino
Pérez-Ruiz Elisabeth
Medina-Pérez Ángeles
author_sort Rueda Antonio
title Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_short Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_full Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_fullStr Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_full_unstemmed Has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
title_sort has the time to come leave the “watch-and-wait” strategy in newly diagnosed asymptomatic follicular lymphoma patients?
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2012-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Historically, the median overall survival for follicular lymphoma (FL) has been considered to be 9-10 years, and no treatment had ever prolonged this time period. Studies conducted more than 20 years ago demonstrated that treating patients with asymptomatic FL at the onset of the disease did not increase their survival, and that almost 20% of these patients did not need any treatment in the first 10 years of follow-up. Based on these facts, most clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance policies for patients with asymptomatic FL.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The introduction of antiCD-20 monoclonal antibodies, over the last 15 years, has significantly increased the median survival rate to above 14 years. This improvement was achieved before the combination of rituximab and chemotherapy regimens became extensively used in patients with symptomatic disease. Therefore, this increase in survival may currently be more significant. At present, several clinical trials have evaluated low-toxicity therapies that prolong progression-free periods, among which rituximab monotherapy, radioimmunotherapy or the combination of rituximab with bendamustine are the most relevant. Unfortunately, these clinical trials have included only patients with symptomatic FL. The results of a recently reported clinical trial show that treatment with single-agent rituximab prolongs progression-free survival rates, time to new treatment and the quality of life of asymptomatic patients, as compared with the active surveillance strategy. Longer follow-up of these results and data regarding overall survival are awaited before this treatment can be recommended as the standard initial therapy.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>There are different therapeutic possibilities for asymptomatic FL patients, but no data are currently available to indicate which option is the best. Patients need to understand the risks and benefits of observation versus treatment before a final decision can be made. For patients who want active treatment the administration of four weekly rituximab doses should be considered.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/210
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedaantonio hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT casanovamaria hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT redondomaximino hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT perezruizelisabeth hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
AT medinaperezangeles hasthetimetocomeleavethewatchandwaitstrategyinnewlydiagnosedasymptomaticfollicularlymphomapatients
_version_ 1725766526041063424