Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It

Offshore aquaculture is increasingly viewed as a mechanism to meet growing protein demand for seafood, while minimizing adverse consequences on the environment and other uses in the oceans. However, despite growing interest in offshore aquaculture, there appears to be no consensus as to what measure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Halley E. Froehlich, Alexandra Smith, Rebecca R. Gentry, Benjamin S. Halpern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00154/full
id doaj-24610cb78cf3459fbb4fc27a880018b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-24610cb78cf3459fbb4fc27a880018b92020-11-24T23:43:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452017-05-01410.3389/fmars.2017.00154236704Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See ItHalley E. Froehlich0Alexandra Smith1Rebecca R. Gentry2Benjamin S. Halpern3Benjamin S. Halpern4Benjamin S. Halpern5National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, United StatesBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, United StatesBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, United StatesNational Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, United StatesBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara, CA, United StatesDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College LondonAscot, United KingdomOffshore aquaculture is increasingly viewed as a mechanism to meet growing protein demand for seafood, while minimizing adverse consequences on the environment and other uses in the oceans. However, despite growing interest in offshore aquaculture, there appears to be no consensus as to what measures commonly define an offshore site or how effects of offshore aquaculture—relative to more nearshore practices—are assessed. This lack of agreement on what constitutes offshore aquaculture has the potential to convolute communication, create uncertainty in regulatory processes, and impede understanding of the ecological implications of offshore farming. To begin addressing these issues, we reviewed and analyzed biologically-focused primary and gray literature (Ntotal = 70) that categorize and quantify characteristics of offshore aquaculture from around the world. We found that many “offshore” descriptions are relatively close to shore (<3 nm) and significantly shallower (minimum depth ≤30 m) than may be assumed. We also uncovered an overall lack of consistent reporting of even the most common location-focused metrics (distance from shore, depth, current), a dearth of impact related studies (n = 17), and narrow scope of the studies themselves (i.e., 82% nutrient pollution). Of the finite subset of articles that investigated negative ecological impacts of offshore aquaculture, we found the probability of any measurable impact from an offshore farm appears to significantly decrease with distance from the farm (probability of measurable response at 90 m ± SE = 0.01 ± 0.03). Such general, but informative points of reference could be more robustly quantified with better systematic and standardized reporting of physical farm characteristics and a broader scope of ecological investigation into the effects of marine aquaculture. With offshore aquaculture still in its infancy, consistent metrics are needed for a comparable framework to guide sustainable offshore aquaculture research and development globally.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00154/fulloffshoreopen-oceanaquaculturesustainableecological impactmariculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Halley E. Froehlich
Alexandra Smith
Rebecca R. Gentry
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
spellingShingle Halley E. Froehlich
Alexandra Smith
Rebecca R. Gentry
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
Frontiers in Marine Science
offshore
open-ocean
aquaculture
sustainable
ecological impact
mariculture
author_facet Halley E. Froehlich
Alexandra Smith
Rebecca R. Gentry
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern
author_sort Halley E. Froehlich
title Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
title_short Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
title_full Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
title_fullStr Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
title_full_unstemmed Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It
title_sort offshore aquaculture: i know it when i see it
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Offshore aquaculture is increasingly viewed as a mechanism to meet growing protein demand for seafood, while minimizing adverse consequences on the environment and other uses in the oceans. However, despite growing interest in offshore aquaculture, there appears to be no consensus as to what measures commonly define an offshore site or how effects of offshore aquaculture—relative to more nearshore practices—are assessed. This lack of agreement on what constitutes offshore aquaculture has the potential to convolute communication, create uncertainty in regulatory processes, and impede understanding of the ecological implications of offshore farming. To begin addressing these issues, we reviewed and analyzed biologically-focused primary and gray literature (Ntotal = 70) that categorize and quantify characteristics of offshore aquaculture from around the world. We found that many “offshore” descriptions are relatively close to shore (<3 nm) and significantly shallower (minimum depth ≤30 m) than may be assumed. We also uncovered an overall lack of consistent reporting of even the most common location-focused metrics (distance from shore, depth, current), a dearth of impact related studies (n = 17), and narrow scope of the studies themselves (i.e., 82% nutrient pollution). Of the finite subset of articles that investigated negative ecological impacts of offshore aquaculture, we found the probability of any measurable impact from an offshore farm appears to significantly decrease with distance from the farm (probability of measurable response at 90 m ± SE = 0.01 ± 0.03). Such general, but informative points of reference could be more robustly quantified with better systematic and standardized reporting of physical farm characteristics and a broader scope of ecological investigation into the effects of marine aquaculture. With offshore aquaculture still in its infancy, consistent metrics are needed for a comparable framework to guide sustainable offshore aquaculture research and development globally.
topic offshore
open-ocean
aquaculture
sustainable
ecological impact
mariculture
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00154/full
work_keys_str_mv AT halleyefroehlich offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
AT alexandrasmith offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
AT rebeccargentry offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
AT benjaminshalpern offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
AT benjaminshalpern offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
AT benjaminshalpern offshoreaquacultureiknowitwheniseeit
_version_ 1725500959839223808