Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain

The unprecedented growth of international arbitration and the current state of euphoria should not serve to obscure the several challenges that lie ahead. While some challenges may only concern practical, albeit manageable issues, others may well turn into existential crisis. Will arbitration survi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamed H. Negm
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Qatar University Press 2017-05-01
Series:International Review of Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.qu.edu.qa/index.php/IRL/article/view/1194
id doaj-244b6888b88345b0a8d213f85e99d151
record_format Article
spelling doaj-244b6888b88345b0a8d213f85e99d1512021-09-07T10:59:20ZaraQatar University PressInternational Review of Law2710-25052223-859X2017-05-0120172Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain Mohamed H. Negm The unprecedented growth of international arbitration and the current state of euphoria should not serve to obscure the several challenges that lie ahead. While some challenges may only concern practical, albeit manageable issues, others may well turn into existential crisis. Will arbitration survive the backlash against it? Arbitration has come under the intense scrutiny of civil society, with many critical voices questioning whether international arbitration is an appropriate mode of dispute resolution, particularly for disputes that have important implications on national public policy and sovereignty, such as investment disputes. The Guardian (December 2013) described international investment tribunals as a “toxic mechanism” that allows “big corporations to sue governments before secretive arbitration panels composed of corporate lawyers, which bypass domestic courts and override the will of parliaments”. Meanwhile, a new law enacted last month in Qatar modernizing the Arab nation’s arbitration regime is being praised as a welcome development to encourage foreign investment in the country, but some practitioners still question whether the measure is actually a missed opportunity. To change this perception, arbitration lawyers and institutions must demonstrate the potential contribution of international arbitration to the rule of law. They also need to demonstrate that arbitration can function as an open and transparent system that takes account of the public interest, and can be a force of good not only for business but for civil society too. https://journals.qu.edu.qa/index.php/IRL/article/view/1194international arbitrationfuturechallengesinvestment
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed H. Negm
spellingShingle Mohamed H. Negm
Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
International Review of Law
international arbitration
future
challenges
investment
author_facet Mohamed H. Negm
author_sort Mohamed H. Negm
title Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
title_short Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
title_full Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
title_fullStr Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
title_full_unstemmed Future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: A peek behind the curtain
title_sort future challenges and paradigmatic changes in international arbitration: a peek behind the curtain
publisher Qatar University Press
series International Review of Law
issn 2710-2505
2223-859X
publishDate 2017-05-01
description The unprecedented growth of international arbitration and the current state of euphoria should not serve to obscure the several challenges that lie ahead. While some challenges may only concern practical, albeit manageable issues, others may well turn into existential crisis. Will arbitration survive the backlash against it? Arbitration has come under the intense scrutiny of civil society, with many critical voices questioning whether international arbitration is an appropriate mode of dispute resolution, particularly for disputes that have important implications on national public policy and sovereignty, such as investment disputes. The Guardian (December 2013) described international investment tribunals as a “toxic mechanism” that allows “big corporations to sue governments before secretive arbitration panels composed of corporate lawyers, which bypass domestic courts and override the will of parliaments”. Meanwhile, a new law enacted last month in Qatar modernizing the Arab nation’s arbitration regime is being praised as a welcome development to encourage foreign investment in the country, but some practitioners still question whether the measure is actually a missed opportunity. To change this perception, arbitration lawyers and institutions must demonstrate the potential contribution of international arbitration to the rule of law. They also need to demonstrate that arbitration can function as an open and transparent system that takes account of the public interest, and can be a force of good not only for business but for civil society too.
topic international arbitration
future
challenges
investment
url https://journals.qu.edu.qa/index.php/IRL/article/view/1194
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedhnegm futurechallengesandparadigmaticchangesininternationalarbitrationapeekbehindthecurtain
_version_ 1717763646971445248