Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).

Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keith Lohse, Sydney Y Schaefer, Adam Raikes, Lara Boyd, Catherine E Lang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2016.00153/full
id doaj-244a9686891345ca9d1641b9014f7aa7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-244a9686891345ca9d1641b9014f7aa72020-11-24T22:02:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952016-09-01710.3389/fneur.2016.00153205521Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).Keith Lohse0Sydney Y Schaefer1Sydney Y Schaefer2Adam Raikes3Lara Boyd4Catherine E Lang5Auburn UniversityArizona State UniversityUtah State UniversityUtah State UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisBackground: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 yr 41; 85, (shown as median range) and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 d 1; 3372. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h 0; 221, over interventions of different durations, 28 d 10; 365. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusions: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.PROSPERO# CRD4201409010http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2016.00153/fullClinical Trials as TopicRehabilitationStrokeNeurorehabilitationhealth informatics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keith Lohse
Sydney Y Schaefer
Sydney Y Schaefer
Adam Raikes
Lara Boyd
Catherine E Lang
spellingShingle Keith Lohse
Sydney Y Schaefer
Sydney Y Schaefer
Adam Raikes
Lara Boyd
Catherine E Lang
Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
Frontiers in Neurology
Clinical Trials as Topic
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Neurorehabilitation
health informatics
author_facet Keith Lohse
Sydney Y Schaefer
Sydney Y Schaefer
Adam Raikes
Lara Boyd
Catherine E Lang
author_sort Keith Lohse
title Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
title_short Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
title_full Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
title_fullStr Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
title_full_unstemmed Asking new questions with old data: The Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR).
title_sort asking new questions with old data: the centralized open-access rehabilitation database for stroke (scoar).
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Background: This paper introduces a tool for streamlining data integration in rehabilitation science, the Centralized Open-Access Rehabilitation database for Stroke (SCOAR), which allows researchers to quickly visualize relationships among variables, efficiently share data, generate hypotheses, and enhance clinical trial design. Methods: Bibliographic databases were searched according to inclusion criteria leaving 2,892 titles that were further screened to 514 manuscripts to be screened by full text, leaving 215 randomized controlled trials in the database (489 independent groups representing 12,847 patients). Demographic, methodological, and statistical data were extracted by independent coders and entered into SCOAR. Results: Trial data came from 114 locations in 27 different countries and represented patients with a wide range of ages, 62 yr 41; 85, (shown as median range) and at various stages of recovery following their stroke, 141 d 1; 3372. There was considerable variation in the dose of therapy that patients received, 20 h 0; 221, over interventions of different durations, 28 d 10; 365. There was also a lack of common data elements (CDEs) across trials, but this lack of CDEs was most pronounced for baseline assessments of patient impairment and severity of stroke. Conclusions: Data integration across hundreds of RCTs allows clinicians and researchers to quickly visualize data from the history of the field and lays the foundation for making SCOAR a living database to which researchers can upload new data as trial results are published. SCOAR is a useful tool for clinicians and researchers that will facilitate data visualization, data sharing, the finding of relevant past studies, and the design of clinical trials by enabling more accurate and comprehensive power analyses. Furthermore, these data speak to the need for CDEs specific to stroke rehabilitation in randomized controlled trials.PROSPERO# CRD4201409010
topic Clinical Trials as Topic
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Neurorehabilitation
health informatics
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fneur.2016.00153/full
work_keys_str_mv AT keithlohse askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
AT sydneyyschaefer askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
AT sydneyyschaefer askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
AT adamraikes askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
AT laraboyd askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
AT catherineelang askingnewquestionswitholddatathecentralizedopenaccessrehabilitationdatabaseforstrokescoar
_version_ 1725836667604959232