Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>An evaluation of progress with participatory approaches for improvement of health knowledge and health experiences of disadvantaged people in eight Districts of Eastern Nepal has been undertaken.</p> <p>Methods</p>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rana Ram B, Ghimire Rabindra, Shah Mahendra B, Kumal Tirtha, Whitley Elise, Baker Ian A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC International Health and Human Rights
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/20
id doaj-2448609ba1c0460ea17374432ddc0429
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2448609ba1c0460ea17374432ddc04292021-04-02T17:55:18ZengBMCBMC International Health and Human Rights1472-698X2012-09-011212010.1186/1472-698X-12-20Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluationRana Ram BGhimire RabindraShah Mahendra BKumal TirthaWhitley EliseBaker Ian A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>An evaluation of progress with participatory approaches for improvement of health knowledge and health experiences of disadvantaged people in eight Districts of Eastern Nepal has been undertaken.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A random selection of Village Development Committees and households, within the eight Districts where participation and a Rights-based Approach had been promoted specifically by local NGOs were compared with similar villages and households in eight Districts where this approach had not been promoted. Information was sought by structured interview and observation by experienced enumerators from both groups of householders. Health knowledge and experiences were compared between the two sets of households. Adjustments were made for demographic confounders.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Complete data sets were available for 628 of the 640 households. Health knowledge and experiences were low for both sets of households. However, health knowledge and experiences were greater in the participatory households compared with the non-participatory households. These differences remained after adjustment for confounders.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The study was designed to evaluate progress with participatory processes delivered by non-governmental organisations over a five year period. Improvements in health knowledge and experiences of disadvantaged people were demonstrated in a consistent and robust manner where interventions had taken place.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/20
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rana Ram B
Ghimire Rabindra
Shah Mahendra B
Kumal Tirtha
Whitley Elise
Baker Ian A
spellingShingle Rana Ram B
Ghimire Rabindra
Shah Mahendra B
Kumal Tirtha
Whitley Elise
Baker Ian A
Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
BMC International Health and Human Rights
author_facet Rana Ram B
Ghimire Rabindra
Shah Mahendra B
Kumal Tirtha
Whitley Elise
Baker Ian A
author_sort Rana Ram B
title Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
title_short Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
title_full Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
title_fullStr Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Health improvement for disadvantaged people in Nepal – an evaluation
title_sort health improvement for disadvantaged people in nepal – an evaluation
publisher BMC
series BMC International Health and Human Rights
issn 1472-698X
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>An evaluation of progress with participatory approaches for improvement of health knowledge and health experiences of disadvantaged people in eight Districts of Eastern Nepal has been undertaken.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A random selection of Village Development Committees and households, within the eight Districts where participation and a Rights-based Approach had been promoted specifically by local NGOs were compared with similar villages and households in eight Districts where this approach had not been promoted. Information was sought by structured interview and observation by experienced enumerators from both groups of householders. Health knowledge and experiences were compared between the two sets of households. Adjustments were made for demographic confounders.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Complete data sets were available for 628 of the 640 households. Health knowledge and experiences were low for both sets of households. However, health knowledge and experiences were greater in the participatory households compared with the non-participatory households. These differences remained after adjustment for confounders.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The study was designed to evaluate progress with participatory processes delivered by non-governmental organisations over a five year period. Improvements in health knowledge and experiences of disadvantaged people were demonstrated in a consistent and robust manner where interventions had taken place.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/20
work_keys_str_mv AT ranaramb healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
AT ghimirerabindra healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
AT shahmahendrab healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
AT kumaltirtha healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
AT whitleyelise healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
AT bakeriana healthimprovementfordisadvantagedpeopleinnepalanevaluation
_version_ 1721552843614191616